(11-03-2016 04:32 PM)john01992 Wrote:  didn't the young vote overwhelmingly to remain?

So?

I've already proven that the "will of voters" is not infallible or unquestionable.

Quite the opposite, in fact.

So convenient, HoD.

When the votes go your way --- the voters voted! How dare anyone question that!


But if it doesn't go your way, it was rigged.

Man, Bison cracks me up!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(11-03-2016 05:27 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  If >50% of people voted to murder your dog, ark30inf, you'd just accept that as "the will of the people"?

Point defeated.

Why don't you tell us what the proverbial dog is in this in situation?

The idea of whether or not the UK should continue to outsource its sovereignty to a corrupt leviathan like the EU is about as fundamental as it comes, and is the type of thing that ought to be brought to a vote.

you know what's probably happening, here? All of the predictions of the Brexit downward spiral for the pound and British economy failed to pass, and with Deutchebank sinking something had to be done to ensure the banksters are able to keep one of the stronger pillars of the EU from leaving.

What part of non binding resolution don't we understand folks? Please some rightie answer that?

England can still leave the EU, but just not via illegal methods.

Scotland will declare independence and stay in the EU.

(11-03-2016 06:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:32 PM)john01992 Wrote:  didn't the young vote overwhelmingly to remain?

So?

I thought some were implying the opposite. Also it just goes to show that those who are going to suffer the most from Brexit are the ones who want it the least.

(11-03-2016 06:11 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  What part of non binding resolution don't we understand folks? Please some rightie answer that?

And people wonder why I am so quick to call them idiots, morons, and dumb***

(11-03-2016 06:03 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Man, Bison cracks me up!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm almost certain that he is in fact, Aids Skrillix or Carl the Cuck.

(11-03-2016 06:11 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  England can still leave the EU, but just not via illegal methods.

Scotland will declare independence and stay in the EU.

If they think that's best, they should. That's how sovereignty works.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(11-03-2016 04:23 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  HoD,

Definitely wrong. Easily wrong. It should be delegitimized.

A vocal minority of old, racist, xenophobe Brits whipped dumb voters into a frenzy, and those voters regretted their yes votes when it finally hit home.


Much like what could happen with another election happening very soon ...

I don't think you know what xenophobe even means.

Prove me wrong



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

(11-03-2016 06:07 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 05:27 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  If >50% of people voted to murder your dog, ark30inf, you'd just accept that as "the will of the people"?

Point defeated.

Why don't you tell us what the proverbial dog is in this in situation?

The idea of whether or not the UK should continue to outsource its sovereignty to a corrupt leviathan like the EU is about as fundamental as it comes, and is the type of thing that ought to be brought to a vote.

you know what's probably happening, here? All of the predictions of the Brexit downward spiral for the pound and British economy failed to pass, and with Deutchebank sinking something had to be done to ensure the banksters are able to keep one of the stronger pillars of the EU from leaving.

WTF are you talking about?

(11-03-2016 06:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 06:07 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 05:27 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  If >50% of people voted to murder your dog, ark30inf, you'd just accept that as "the will of the people"?

Point defeated.

Why don't you tell us what the proverbial dog is in this in situation?

The idea of whether or not the UK should continue to outsource its sovereignty to a corrupt leviathan like the EU is about as fundamental as it comes, and is the type of thing that ought to be brought to a vote.

you know what's probably happening, here? All of the predictions of the Brexit downward spiral for the pound and British economy failed to pass, and with Deutchebank sinking something had to be done to ensure the banksters are able to keep one of the stronger pillars of the EU from leaving.

WTF are you talking about?

That graph looks different if it has an axis that actually starts at zero.

I swear the cons on here lack basic understanding of financial news.

(11-03-2016 06:17 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 06:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:32 PM)john01992 Wrote:  didn't the young vote overwhelmingly to remain?

So?

I thought some were implying the opposite. Also it just goes to show that those who are going to suffer the most from Brexit are the ones who want it the least.

That's not a valid argument because we don't count votes on any basis other than the number 1 for a reason.

(11-03-2016 06:02 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  So convenient, HoD.

When the votes go your way --- the voters voted! How dare anyone question that!


But if it doesn't go your way, it was rigged.

K

(11-03-2016 07:13 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 06:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 06:07 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 05:27 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  If >50% of people voted to murder your dog, ark30inf, you'd just accept that as "the will of the people"?

Point defeated.

Why don't you tell us what the proverbial dog is in this in situation?

The idea of whether or not the UK should continue to outsource its sovereignty to a corrupt leviathan like the EU is about as fundamental as it comes, and is the type of thing that ought to be brought to a vote.

you know what's probably happening, here? All of the predictions of the Brexit downward spiral for the pound and British economy failed to pass, and with Deutchebank sinking something had to be done to ensure the banksters are able to keep one of the stronger pillars of the EU from leaving.

WTF are you talking about?

That graph looks different if it has an axis that actually starts at zero.

That's how they like to measure gun crime, as well. They zoom and zoom and zoom and zoom the graph so that 2 or 3 more people being shot out of a sample size of 100,000 looks like it's end of the world.

(11-03-2016 07:44 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 06:17 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 06:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:32 PM)john01992 Wrote:  didn't the young vote overwhelmingly to remain?

So?

I thought some were implying the opposite. Also it just goes to show that those who are going to suffer the most from Brexit are the ones who want it the least.

That's not a valid argument because we don't count votes on any basis other than the number 1 for a reason.

while I don't disagree with that notion, I do think it is important to highlight that fact. is it not incredibly telling of the high cost we are inflicting on people?

(11-03-2016 07:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 07:44 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 06:17 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 06:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:32 PM)john01992 Wrote:  didn't the young vote overwhelmingly to remain?

So?

I thought some were implying the opposite. Also it just goes to show that those who are going to suffer the most from Brexit are the ones who want it the least.

That's not a valid argument because we don't count votes on any basis other than the number 1 for a reason.

while I don't disagree with that notion, I do think it is important to highlight that fact. is it not incredibly telling of the high cost we are inflicting on people?

Not in light of how democracy works.

Voting is about society as a whole, not picking important parts of society for whichever reason and giving them primacy.