Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
MaddDawgz02 Offline
Banned

Posts: 40,735
Joined: Jan 2004
I Root For: any UT opponent
Location:
Post: #1
BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
This is just hardcore proof right here how much of a whack job that committee did. Back in 2012 I developed a pretty rigorous BCS calculation system, both to calculate current scores and to predict next weeks. Here is just the raw BCS calculation of what it would have looked like this week. Everything is the exact same that would have gone into the BCS with one exception, the AP poll I substituted for the Harris poll. Other than that Coaches Poll and all 6 BCS computers are intact. Look how far WMU jumps in the old system! This is a much better representation in my opinion. Hopefully for WMU fans that Boise problem getting to the conference championship game does prevent them from getting in, but this shows it shouldn't even be close!

Just taking that 1/3 computer component of the old BCS system, WMU would have been ranked number 8 which is why they make such a big jump to 13 in the overall standings.
Top 10 computer ranked teams 1) Alabama 2) Clemson 3) Michigan 4) Washington 5) Ohio State 6) Texas A&M 7) Louisville 8) Western Michigan 9) Wisconsin 10) Auburn

[Image: bcs_oct31.png]
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2016 10:00 AM by MaddDawgz02.)
11-02-2016 09:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


indianasniff Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,841
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 26
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #2
BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
When we lived under BCS did we not all agree it sucked. Just saying

Not saying the current system is better but..,,


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
11-02-2016 10:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
kreed5120 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,106
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Akron
Location:
Post: #3
RE: BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
Yeah, BCS was god awful. No matter what they do someone will always complain.
11-02-2016 11:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


UofToledoFans Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,682
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Toledo and G5
Location:
Post: #4
RE: BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
If there was no G5 champ inside the top 16 we had no G5 access bowl team... So i like this system. Keep winning Broncos
11-02-2016 11:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
george14 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,783
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 28
I Root For: CMU
Location: Detroit
Post: #5
RE: BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
(11-02-2016 10:41 AM)indianasniff Wrote:  When we lived under BCS did we not all agree it sucked. Just saying

Not saying the current system is better but..,,


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When we all lived under no instant replay or reviews did we not agree it sucked? Just saying

Times change and we expected fairness. Just like replay, we didn't expect these clowns to still get things wrong routinely, nor did we expect games to literally extend 30 minutes. We expected some delays but also more accuracy and efficiency. We got neither, really.

The point is, the BCS was bad for the natty at times but this system is more corrupt with how teams get there now. At least with computers there was an element of removing bias. Now, you will have humans being biased. There is not a chance in hell 2012 NIU would be above #20 with the current system. But the computers helped them out. Having a 4 team playoff helps, yes, but it essentially forces a bias toward the P5. The fact that Oklahoma State is 5 spots ahead of WMU is all I need to see. They are 5-2 with a loss to a team that WMU throttled, while WMU is 8-0. TA&M above WSH is another screwjob.
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2016 01:02 PM by george14.)
11-02-2016 11:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Bronc33 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,708
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 32
I Root For: WMU
Location:
Post: #6
RE: BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
the BCS calculations were fine. The issue was there was no playoff. They should have just added the playoff to the BCS.
11-02-2016 11:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
george14 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,783
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 28
I Root For: CMU
Location: Detroit
Post: #7
RE: BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
(11-02-2016 11:54 AM)Bronc33 Wrote:  the BCS calculations were fine. The issue was there was no playoff. They should have just added the playoff to the BCS.

100%
11-02-2016 01:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


indianasniff Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,841
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 26
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #8
BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
Butt crack sweat should not be a topic on this board


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
11-02-2016 01:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Okie Chippewa Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,958
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation: 46
I Root For: The MAC
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Post: #9
RE: BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
The current committee members appear to weigh WHO a team has played to a much greater degree than HOW a team has played. That kind of weighting is detrimental to G5 teams EVERY time.
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2016 02:34 PM by Okie Chippewa.)
11-02-2016 02:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Bronco'14 Offline
WMU
*

Posts: 12,389
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 201
I Root For: WMU Broncos
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Post: #10
RE: BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
(11-02-2016 01:00 PM)george14 Wrote:  
(11-02-2016 11:54 AM)Bronc33 Wrote:  the BCS calculations were fine. The issue was there was no playoff. They should have just added the playoff to the BCS.

100%

Right.

The other issue, as stated, was that if a G5 team didn't have a certain ranking, too bad.

Now they're forced to take a G5 team.
11-02-2016 05:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MaddDawgz02 Offline
Banned

Posts: 40,735
Joined: Jan 2004
I Root For: any UT opponent
Location:
Post: #11
RE: BCS simulated standings through Oct 30th
(11-02-2016 05:22 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  
(11-02-2016 01:00 PM)george14 Wrote:  
(11-02-2016 11:54 AM)Bronc33 Wrote:  the BCS calculations were fine. The issue was there was no playoff. They should have just added the playoff to the BCS.

100%

Right.

The other issue, as stated, was that if a G5 team didn't have a certain ranking, too bad.

Now they're forced to take a G5 team.

Yeah but it's always always going to be an AAC or MWC team In the old system the Broncos would have had a strangle hold on this ranked at 13 while now they will probably be jumped by the MWC champ just because of a corrupt commitee
11-02-2016 06:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.