(10-10-2016 01:52 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  When both parties are liars and elitist scumbags who think they have Right to Rule, what the hell do I care which of them is in charge?

Hilary is a criminal
Trump is a buffoon.

Point, Trump.

Sad but true. Trump is bad, Killary is worst. This country will not win with either but I still have my reasons to not vote the Libturd to office. I am one vote and I sure can't move the meter. I may cry a little with either one.

Thank God I'm an oldman and probably won't have to watch the results for too long.

Hillary knows how to play the game of politics.
Trump only knows how to steal money from people.

Point, Hillary

(10-10-2016 01:11 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  Have any of you yet come to the realization that you have made a big mistake and have basically allowed a very vulnerable and not well-liked democrat party candidate to take the white house without much effort?

Not only is Trump going to fail to beat Hillary but the GOP establishment is going to score a big win after Trump gets curb stomped in a few weeks.

Whether you thought Trump was the only way to beat Hillary or a means blow up the GOP, you failed.

Thanks a lot, guys.

while he hasn't lost yet, I've certainly thought about it. I have infinite faith in the ability of the republican party to **** up, even when when ******* up seems impossible.

in 2012, we nominated the only guy in the entire party that couldn't run against obamacare because he invented it. in 2016, we nominate probably the only guy in a 17 candidate field that couldn't beat the weakest dem nominee since jimmy carter, the accidental president, just by showing up on election day.

that was the strongest field of candidates that either party has offered, perhaps, in history, and we nominate the guy who's most known for casino bankruptcies and divorces. and now, we so unfortunately find out, p*ssy grabbing.

as I said, he hasn't lost yet. but that's not because he's strong, it's because she is so incredibly, horribly, and (probably) fatally flawed.

like, c'mon, people. would scott walker have been so bad?

(10-10-2016 02:00 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  Hillary knows how to play the game of politics.
Trump only knows how to steal money from people.

Point, Hillary

*cough* $6b *cough*


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Grabbing women's genitalia without consent isn't a crime?

The House is in play, per GOP internal polling. That story broke last night. Dems need to win a generic ballot by about 6 and this poll for instance has them +7.

So if a Liberal is a Turd, then what is a conservative?

A lump of colon cancer?

(10-10-2016 02:02 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  So if a Liberal is a Turd, then what is a conservative?

A lump of colon cancer?

Why do you hate people with cancer?

Yet despite all this, we'll wind up with another Clinton. Where's the victory in that? More of the same. Nothing changes. Congrats to us. We are idiots.

(10-10-2016 02:02 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Grabbing women's genitalia without consent isn't a crime?

The House is in play, per GOP internal polling. That story broke last night. Dems need to win a generic ballot by about 6 and this poll for instance has them +7.

You said without consent. Trump said they let him.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Apparently the girl he was talking about, Nancy ODell, didn't!

(10-10-2016 01:34 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  The Republican Party deserves everything it has gotten.

If they didn't want this to happen they should not have conspired to rig up the primaries for a dynastic candidate from a dynasty that their rank and file wanted no part of.





Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

That's a bingo.

ollie,

I don't hate conservatives. Or people with cancer.

Not sure why you said that, actually.

Your posts refute that.

No they don't.

(10-10-2016 01:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Yea, the Dems that voted to nominate Hillary just did the nation a great favor. I mean she is perfect after all. Please, Hillary is as bad as it gets. Yes, worse than Trump.

Actually, the dems voted to nominate the Bern. It was the dimocrat establishment that nominated Hillary.

(10-10-2016 01:28 PM)miko33 Wrote:  I voted for Trump in the primaries, thinking that he would be a real change agent who would make a pivot in the general. I thought he would have taken running for office seriously; however, that has not been the case based on what I saw. My issues with Trump are due to 1) He's not been preparing effectively, which tells me that he's not serious about winning and 2) His ego has become detrimental to him where he will personally attack people who disagree with him for an extended period of time. To his credit he has a much more detailed page where he addresses the issues. However, I don't believe that he'll follow thru on it based on how he's been behaving in the general.

I'll disagree with this one Miko slightly.. (and again, I went for Cruz in the primaries... because I wasn't going to complete "waste" my vote and put Walker's name in after he was already out).

Do we really know he wasn't debate preparing?

Ego? You have to have an ego to run for the highest office in the United States. Hillary's ego should be as detrimental, but the media doesn't cover it as well as they should.. "WHAT DOES IT MATTER?" come to mind?

HRC was known for going on shouting matches with people she disagreed with while she was the First Lady and while she was a Senator (as has been leaked out many times in the past, particularly by ex-Secret Service people).

Her demeanor while Sect. of State is a little less known.

(10-10-2016 01:15 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I'm surprised that many on this forum who support him have doubled down. After this weekend, I was sure someone would announce that they could no longer support him.

I was wrong.

Why, because those that support Hillary even after her lies have been exposed still support her?? Double standard much?

(10-10-2016 02:15 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-10-2016 01:28 PM)miko33 Wrote:  I voted for Trump in the primaries, thinking that he would be a real change agent who would make a pivot in the general. I thought he would have taken running for office seriously; however, that has not been the case based on what I saw. My issues with Trump are due to 1) He's not been preparing effectively, which tells me that he's not serious about winning and 2) His ego has become detrimental to him where he will personally attack people who disagree with him for an extended period of time. To his credit he has a much more detailed page where he addresses the issues. However, I don't believe that he'll follow thru on it based on how he's been behaving in the general.

I'll disagree with this one Miko slightly.. (and again, I went for Cruz in the primaries... because I wasn't going to complete "waste" my vote and put Walker's name in after he was already out).

Do we really know he wasn't debate preparing?

Ego? You have to have an ego to run for the highest office in the United States. Hillary's ego should be as detrimental, but the media doesn't cover it as well as they should.. "WHAT DOES IT MATTER?" come to mind?

HRC was known for going on shouting matches with people she disagreed with while she was the First Lady and while she was a Senator (as has been leaked out many times in the past, particularly by ex-Secret Service people).

Her demeanor while Sect. of State is a little less known.

Ego is an understatement. I'd say he has full blown NPD. No one should be stupid enough to engage in an extended twitter war with the Kahn family and then with the porker formerly known as a Miss Universe winner. If you are sane, you shrug them off as unimportant people and ignore completely or you acknowledge their pain and proceed to tell us how you becoming president makes things better.

What happens when a guy like Putin throws him off by toying with his mind? Don't think a former KGB agent wouldn't know how to exploit Donald's obsession to attack anyone who has the audacity to call him out on something?

(10-10-2016 01:11 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  Have any of you yet come to the realization that you have made a big mistake and have basically allowed a very vulnerable and not well-liked democrat party candidate to take the white house without much effort?

Not only is Trump going to fail to beat Hillary but the GOP establishment is going to score a big win after Trump gets curb stomped in a few weeks.

Whether you thought Trump was the only way to beat Hillary or a means blow up the GOP, you failed.

Thanks a lot, guys.

He won the nomination fair and square
Won it against 16 opponent's. At least the RNC's candidate wasn't predetermined like Hillary. DNC emails show Bernie never had a chance. How can you support that? How much of your soul are you willing to sell for power?

Sent from my XT1080 using CSNbbs mobile app

(10-10-2016 01:34 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  The Republican Party deserves everything it has gotten.

If they didn't want this to happen they should not have conspired to rig up the primaries for a dynastic candidate from a dynasty that their rank and file wanted no part of.





Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Wait. Rigged campaign?

Dynastic candidate no one wants a part of?

Which nomination campaign are you referring to?

Face it, the dims are much more "loyal" to party and the end game no matter how corrupt the process or the candidate.

Hell, despite the confirmation (and it being put square in front of the face) of what most of us already knew or suspected, that the entire dim nomination was a complete farce and probably criminal in some fashion, they fell in line behind the least likable, most corrupt, grifter of a candidate to have been put forth in modern American political history. Most blinked nary an eye, just fell right on line, lock step, within moments and no matter WHAT may continue to come out, they'll be screaming at the top of their lungs, waving the pom poms and voting as many times and as often as they can.

The Repubs are the FIRST ones to throw one of their own under the bus whether it's a Trump or a real Republican or conservative.

The dims would never consider such a thing. I remember well enough the leftist women suggesting that more of them should be willing to line up to service the Bubba simply for his protecting their "right" to kill their babies.

It's an amazing phenomenon.