http://www.clarionledger.com/story/sport.../89537594/

43. App St
63. stAte
65. GS
86. ULL
92. Troy
96. GSU
106. USA
121. Idaho
122. Texas St
123. ULM
124. NMSU

Top G5 from other conferences:
14. SDSU
16. Houston
32. W. Michigan
33. LA Tech

*edited to include SDSU (Boise ST is #18)

VERY bullish on App and WMU.

(08-31-2016 08:36 AM)tapate50 Wrote:  VERY bullish on App and WMU.

Yeah I'm not completely sold on the WMU hype but I do think they will be good #32 in the country good...IDK. That grouping of SBC teams from 121 to 124 smells rotten to me too!

I'm so glad after tomorrow there are no more 128 polls based off 0-0 records to look at.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

#WolvesUp

LOL at WMU #32...

(08-31-2016 08:33 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  http://www.clarionledger.com/story/sport.../89537594/

43. App St
63. stAte
65. GS
86. ULL
92. Troy
96. GSU
106. USA
121. Idaho
122. Texas St
123. ULM
124. NMSU

Top G5 from other conferences:
16. Houston
18. Bosie St
32. W. Michigan
33. LA Tech

14. San Diego State

Winning more OOC games and the more frequent Autonomous5 victories will change this conference's 'perception.'

WMU and La tech made me LMAO

(08-31-2016 09:04 AM)USAJag2011 Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 08:33 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  http://www.clarionledger.com/story/sport.../89537594/

43. App St
63. stAte
65. GS
86. ULL
92. Troy
96. GSU
106. USA
121. Idaho
122. Texas St
123. ULM
124. NMSU

Top G5 from other conferences:
16. Houston
18. Bosie St
32. W. Michigan
33. LA Tech

14. San Diego State

Wow thanks I totally missed that one! Maybe because it's totally uncharacteristic he has 3 G5 teams in the top 25!

I understand why TXST is so low, but how is UTSA higher? And 14 spots at that....

(08-31-2016 09:19 AM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  WMU and La tech made me LMAO

don't mention latech or they'll be swarming over here

(08-31-2016 08:36 AM)tapate50 Wrote:  VERY bullish on App and WMU.

Well it is lower than App finished in 2015.

SDSU higher than Houston is surprising as is stAte being 20 spots below us. Of course this is just one man's pick and none of that matters after this weekend.

Top 125!

(08-31-2016 02:22 PM)slycat Wrote:  Top 125!

I was just about to say cant wait until we dont see any Sun Belt teams with 120+ range. Love the optimism!

(08-31-2016 12:28 PM)JTApps1 Wrote:  SDSU higher than Houston is surprising as is stAte being 20 spots below us. Of course this is just one man's pick and none of that matters after this weekend.

He saw 11-2 and was triggered into putting you that high, despite your last place strength of schedule last year.

APP is a great Sun Belt team and 7-1 in conference is impressive. I'm just not sure the apps are a Top 50 team yet.

(08-31-2016 02:30 PM)JCGSU Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 02:22 PM)slycat Wrote:  Top 125!

I was just about to say cant wait until we dont see any Sun Belt teams with 120+ range. Love the optimism!

After Troy's 2014 outing in the triple digits, I'm glad to see us back in the 90's. We actually started 2015 127th in the Massey Ratings. I'd like to see us in the 60's, but I think we'll end up in the 70's or 80's at season's end.

(08-31-2016 02:32 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(08-31-2016 12:28 PM)JTApps1 Wrote:  SDSU higher than Houston is surprising as is stAte being 20 spots below us. Of course this is just one man's pick and none of that matters after this weekend.

He saw 11-2 and was triggered into putting you that high, despite your last place strength of schedule last year.

APP is a great Sun Belt team and 7-1 in conference is impressive. I'm not sure their a Top 50 team yet.

I was thinking stAte should be higher not us lower, but again these rankings mean nothing.

Troy05 App was receiving votes in last year's poll, the best criteria we have at measuring the top teams at the end of the year. App did under perform vs. Troy last year and that is likely clouding your personal ranking.

I'm not sure App is a top 50 team this year based upon the questions at WR, CB, and OL depth, but we'll find out fairly quickly.

SDSU at 13 is laughable. GS should probably be around 50 or so, but the new coaches probably made them skeptical. I think stAte oughta be a bit higher but they probably just looked at you losing your All SBC QB and didn't bother to look at who you had filling in.