I just have this feeling Trump is going to win in a landslide. Something is happening.

Ever......... Are you being serious????????????????????????

Did I say ever?

My poor poor dim witted one, I was talking about the post one above mine. Authored by EverRespect. Sheeesh

(08-23-2016 11:29 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Guys. I honestly feel bad for some of you true believers. People who don't watch Fox News see the writing on the wall. I think you are being deliberately misled to save the down ballot. I feel bad. A big disappointment is heading your way. It's an intentional deception so they don't get crushed in other races. They need the base to believe they have a shot.

irony: people that criticize FNC invariably get their news from the comedy channel.

(08-23-2016 11:29 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Guys. I honestly feel bad for some of you true believers. People who don't watch Fox News see the writing on the wall. I think you are being deliberately misled to save the down ballot. I feel bad. A big disappointment is heading your way. It's an intentional deception so they don't get crushed in other races. They need the base to believe they have a shot.

I haven't watched more than 10 mins of Fox News in a couple of years.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CSNbbs mobile app

(08-23-2016 12:18 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I just have this feeling Trump is going to win in a landslide. Something is happening.

I agree.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CSNbbs mobile app

Something is happening all right. It's called deception. They can't afford not having the base vote. It's the unskewed polls again.

(08-23-2016 01:35 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Something is happening all right. It's called deception. They can't afford not having the base vote. It's the unskewed polls again.

I know right? Damn those tricky democrats!

(08-23-2016 01:35 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Something is happening all right. It's called deception. They can't afford not having the base vote. It's the unskewed polls again.

Do you think the record numbers of voters that registered to vote for him in the primary are going to fail to show up for the general election? The polling outlets are weighting their polls so they aren't included. These are massive numbers in states like Virginia, Florida, Ohio, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania. Voter turnout in 2012 was 57.5%.

I think a lot of Democrats crossed over for an easy win for Hillary. It was a reverse Operation Chaos.

Trump was the dream Candidate for the Democrats. I wanted him to win the primary. Probably 90% of D's wanted Donald to win.

Think his campaign went from renting half a floor to renting 3 floors. So...

Also from the same article, and for some reason you left out:

"Democrat Hillary Clinton has been leasing two entire floors in a Brooklyn office building totaling 80,000 square feet since the start of her campaign. The rent for that space has been about $212,000 per month."

(08-23-2016 07:33 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Trump was the dream Candidate for the Democrats. I wanted him to win the primary. Probably 90% of D's wanted Donald to win.

I can't wait to see you meltdown. It will be beautiful.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CSNbbs mobile app

(08-23-2016 08:26 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Think his campaign went from renting half a floor to renting 3 floors. So...

Also from the same article, and for some reason you left out:

"Democrat Hillary Clinton has been leasing two entire floors in a Brooklyn office building totaling 80,000 square feet since the start of her campaign. The rent for that space has been about $212,000 per month."

Producer logic.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CSNbbs mobile app

"B-b-but the Michigan Democratic primary!" -UofM on Nov. 8, when Silver is proven right yet again.

Nate isn't using turnout models, Jesus Christ how many times does this have to be said? Yes he weighs polls, but that is to account for things like house effects, and if you're looking at his polls-plus model, the economic picture and the popularity of the incumbent party. Read his ******* blog, he's very clear about this.

Republicans hate statistics, facts, science etc because their overlords tell them to. They literally believe the scientific consensus on climate change is a massive conspiracy against them in academia, and they believe this because the fossil fuel industry owns their politicians. It's truly a garbage, know nothing party, and it needs to be beaten into the ground again and again.

(08-23-2016 09:13 PM)Max Power Wrote:  "B-b-but the Michigan Democratic primary!" -UofM on Nov. 8, when Silver is proven right yet again.

Nate isn't using turnout models, Jesus Christ how many times does this have to be said? Yes he weighs polls, but that is to account for things like house effects, and if you're looking at his polls-plus model, the economic picture and the popularity of the incumbent party. Read his ******* blog, he's very clear about this.

Republicans hate statistics, facts, science etc because their overlords tell them to. They literally believe the scientific consensus on climate change is a massive conspiracy against them in academia, and they believe this because the fossil fuel industry owns their politicians. It's truly a garbage, know nothing party, and it needs to be beaten into the ground again and again.

the know-nothings weren't called the know-nothings because they were somehow mentally deficient. they were referred to as the know-nothings because they were secretive. before you start calling people stupid, you should probably be sure that you have all your facts together -- at least within the post where you're calling people stupid.

you. history. fail. suck it.

(08-23-2016 09:13 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Republicans hate statistics

Like the stats Silver used that said Hillary had a greater than 99% chance of winning Michigan two days before the primary?

Quote:, facts,

that word does not mean wha tyou think it means. It is a fact tha tHillary lied about her emails.

Quote:science etc because their overlords tell them to.

So, you believe homosexuality is a mental disorder? Science does.

Quote: They literally believe the scientific consensus on climate change is a massive conspiracy against them in academia, and they believe this because the fossil fuel industry owns their politicians. It's truly a garbage, know nothing party, and it needs to be beaten into the ground again and again.

Why all of the data manipulation if climate change is fundamentally sound?


The truth is, you hate science. Science is based on running experiments and proving things. You dont want that. You run from that like you run from hard work, accountability, and common sense.

But then again, someone who stands by and allows a candidate to make a fool out of them, and then turns tail and supports that candidate even though she is the epitome of everything they hate isnt someone who has a solid foundation for determining things themselves. So go ahead and take todays talking points a run with them, Gruber. You are just the type of fool the democrats count on; those that Hillary can take a giant sh*t on, and yet will still vote for her.

(08-24-2016 08:12 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  But then again, someone who stands by and allows a candidate to make a fool out of them, and then turns tail and supports that candidate even though she is the epitome of everything they hate isnt someone who has a solid foundation for determining things themselves. So go ahead and take todays talking points a run with them, Gruber. You are just the type of fool the democrats count on; those that Hillary can take a giant sh*t on, and yet will still vote for her.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CSNbbs mobile app

Hey the OJ Jury didn't believe in DNA evidence that virtually incriminated Him as the killer but the Jury let Him walk anyway. Locked on polling means absolutely Nothing . The only pole that matters is when election day is Over and the election is finalized. Even then We might not know the results until early January Whom Won.