RE: Decision Time on Brady
Dukester --
Why would it be devastating to let go of Brady after next season? This year's team, as per what you listed for Sagarin, is 90 slots better, right? If one were to look at Kenpom, and I haven't looked at it in the last week or so, but it showed a similar improvement or better. Also, when looking at next year's team without Curry, you have to look at the additions of Snowden, Hollywood and Shepherd. One could argue that next year's team, provided those are good additions, could be better still, right? Also, you had recently written, when the team was 6-2 in conference, that Brady had turned the corner perhaps. They've gone 4-5 since, losing at home to UNCW, at W&M, at UNCW, home versus NE and at Towson; while beating Drexel on the road, Charleston on the road, Hofstra at home and DE at home. The losses included a one point loss to NE, a two point loss to Towson, a five point loss to UNCW and a six point loss to W&M after surrendering a large lead. During this tough stretch they've also lost, for some period of time, Curry, Brown and Cabarkapa, their top three scorers, to injury.
Meanwhile, the program as per yesterday's paper, was 19th nationally in FG percentage defense (less than 40%) and 4th nationally in 3 point FG% defense (less than 30%). Moreover, their stats in conference, if you down select that at the CAA site, are even better still and they were leading the league in point differential prior to last night's game.
You are correct that the team could use more talent, but the decision, in my humble opinion, should not hinge solely on winning or not winning the CAA tourney. If all coaches within the CAA were held to that standard, they would not have the tenures they do and the league wouldn't be rated the 9th best in the country. Only Brady, Coen and Ross have won the tournament among current CAA coaches if I'm not mistaken.
|