I see UofMemphis is back on his ban assault "style" weapons kick. Time to melt his brain, again.

UofMemphis, please explain which of these is and is not an assault "style" weapon, and why.

(01-07-2016 12:05 AM)randaddyminer Wrote:  NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF **** SUCKING BLOOHAHA GOING AROUND HERE. Most of you should join those cooks in oregon. Ya'lls ***** footing aint gonna get much done here.

How accurate of a description of you prior to the post you made is this?



Seriously....instead of here you might want to spend a little time here:

http://www.aa.org/

(01-07-2016 01:09 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Nearly every mass shooter since 2009 could have and/or did pass a background check. The exceptions that knew they wouldn't pass (surprise, surprise), didn't attempt to pass one, only to be declined. They just stole their guns.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...nd-checks/

Universal background checks will stop N-O-T-H-I-N-G, and is nothing more than the first step towards registration, which has proven to lead to confiscation.

I like this one too..

(01-07-2016 12:05 AM)randaddyminer Wrote:  NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF **** SUCKING BLOOHAHA GOING AROUND HERE. Most of you should join those cooks in oregon. Ya'lls ***** footing aint gonna get much done here.

I don't understand stupid! Could you, perhaps...oh I don't know, speak calmly and rationally?

(01-07-2016 07:52 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(01-07-2016 12:05 AM)randaddyminer Wrote:  NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF **** SUCKING BLOOHAHA GOING AROUND HERE. Most of you should join those cooks in oregon. Ya'lls ***** footing aint gonna get much done here.

I don't understand stupid! Could you, perhaps...oh I don't know, speak calmly and rationally?