Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

(12-08-2015 08:38 PM)LatahCounty Wrote:  Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

How are we not on that list? We were last week. How depressing is that?

(12-08-2015 08:41 PM)CatMom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:38 PM)LatahCounty Wrote:  Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

How are we not on that list? We were last week. How depressing is that?

The Bottom Ten has a high standard of failure . . . .

If you check the Final Bottom Ten Standings, every team that made the list has two or fewer wins . . . . .

Fran has done such a Fran-Tastic Job, accumulating THREE WINS during this season of Leaving No Doubt, that The Mighty Bobcats failed to Qualify for this, The Ultimate List of Failure . . . .

I've no doubt that the Franster will parlay this into either a raise or a contract extension . . . . . Ensuring that Bobcat Fans can look forward to many many more years of Fran-Tastic Football in San Marcos . . . . . .

I seriously have NO DOUBT . .. .

Texas St escaped the dreaded bottom 10 thanks to their outstanding effort vs Ark St. I kid

(12-08-2015 09:12 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  Texas St escaped the dreaded bottom 10 thanks to their outstanding effort vs Ark St. I kid

Speaking of effort...

We do what we can. What more can you ask for?

(12-08-2015 08:41 PM)CatMom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:38 PM)LatahCounty Wrote:  Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

How are we not on that list? We were last week. How depressing is that?

I blame ULM. They clearly came to San Marcos with no intention of winning. To score only three points against one of the worst defensive teams in the country just showed that they wanted the loss more than we did. They earned their Bottom Ten Ranking.

(12-08-2015 11:04 PM)SoCalBobcat78 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:41 PM)CatMom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:38 PM)LatahCounty Wrote:  Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

How are we not on that list? We were last week. How depressing is that?

I blame ULM. They clearly came to San Marcos with no intention of winning. To score only three points against one of the worst defensive teams in the country just showed that they wanted the loss more than we did. They earned their Bottom Ten Ranking.

We beat NMSU to end the season. I thought you are off after a win?

(12-09-2015 07:14 AM)Arrowhead Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 11:04 PM)SoCalBobcat78 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:41 PM)CatMom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:38 PM)LatahCounty Wrote:  Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

How are we not on that list? We were last week. How depressing is that?

I blame ULM. They clearly came to San Marcos with no intention of winning. To score only three points against one of the worst defensive teams in the country just showed that they wanted the loss more than we did. They earned their Bottom Ten Ranking.

We beat NMSU to end the season. I thought you are off after a win?

they probably meant to type an L but mistakenly typed an M

(12-09-2015 07:14 AM)Arrowhead Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 11:04 PM)SoCalBobcat78 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:41 PM)CatMom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:38 PM)LatahCounty Wrote:  Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

How are we not on that list? We were last week. How depressing is that?

I blame ULM. They clearly came to San Marcos with no intention of winning. To score only three points against one of the worst defensive teams in the country just showed that they wanted the loss more than we did. They earned their Bottom Ten Ranking.

We beat NMSU to end the season. I thought you are off after a win?

They probably factored in that you had a 13th game.

(12-09-2015 04:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  AAC had two teams in Bottom 10

Sure, try and make us feel better. Well, it ain't working.

They were probably thinking of the ULM Ragin Cajuns.

(12-09-2015 04:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  AAC had two teams in Bottom 10

The UNTs and Charlotte as well.

(12-09-2015 07:14 AM)Arrowhead Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 11:04 PM)SoCalBobcat78 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:41 PM)CatMom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:38 PM)LatahCounty Wrote:  Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

How are we not on that list? We were last week. How depressing is that?

I blame ULM. They clearly came to San Marcos with no intention of winning. To score only three points against one of the worst defensive teams in the country just showed that they wanted the loss more than we did. They earned their Bottom Ten Ranking.

We beat NMSU to end the season. I thought you are off after a win?

That was Steve Harvey's rule for decades, you win and you're out of the Bottom 10, especially if you won the Pillow Fight of the Week which the ULM-NMSU game had been designated or so I thought. I was truly surprised to see us listed at #10 and immediately thought that someone had bent the so-called rules. Oh, well.....

(12-09-2015 10:41 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  

(12-09-2015 07:14 AM)Arrowhead Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 11:04 PM)SoCalBobcat78 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:41 PM)CatMom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 08:38 PM)LatahCounty Wrote:  Bottom of the Belt WAAAAAY less embarrassing than usual. The conference was on the brink of escaping the Bottom 10 entirely. ULM, at #10. And that's it. This has to be a Sun Belt record.

Article here: http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...m-10-title

How are we not on that list? We were last week. How depressing is that?

I blame ULM. They clearly came to San Marcos with no intention of winning. To score only three points against one of the worst defensive teams in the country just showed that they wanted the loss more than we did. They earned their Bottom Ten Ranking.

We beat NMSU to end the season. I thought you are off after a win?

That was Steve Harvey's rule for decades, you win and you're out of the Bottom 10, especially if you won the Pillow Fight of the Week which the ULM-NMSU game had been designated or so I thought. I was truly surprised to see us listed at #10 and immediately thought that someone had bent the so-called rules. Oh, well.....

After the first week the new guy said you don't get out just because you beat a bad team. i don't like the new guy.

I haven't read that series since maybe September. How had Mcgee handled his favorite Georgia State Not Southern's winning streak? He must be very confused and disappointed.