Guys, UTSA will be a handful to beat...especially on the road.

(09-28-2015 09:06 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-28-2015 08:19 PM)RougeDawg Wrote:  

(09-28-2015 07:31 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-28-2015 06:37 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  Those 4 are definitely beatable with neutral refs. If Tech would have played Kstate at home like UTSA, no doubt a win

Beatable is one thing, actually beating them is a whole other thing. When's the last time you beat a Top 25 P5 team on the road? When's the last time any CUSA team did it for that matter?

2005 I think.

So once or twice every 20 years even though La Tech has been a pretty respectable G5 program? Yet some posters are saying 3-4 CUSA teams could've beat Arizona on the road.

We get it, UTSA played a somewhat tough schedule, but believe me Tech has played harder schedules and actually won some, so ain't nobody afraid of freakin Arizona and Okie State. For instance:

Alabama twice (SEC Champs and Sugar Bowl), Ms State twice, Texas A&M,Ole Miss, Oklahoma State, Baylor

others - Illinois twice, Virginia, California, Boise State

(09-28-2015 09:12 PM)nastybunch Wrote:  Guys, USTA will be a handful to beat...especially on the road.

I feel the same about Miss. Southern. Should be a good game.

(09-28-2015 09:40 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  We get it, UTSA played a somewhat tough schedule, but believe me Tech has played harder schedules and actually won some, so ain't nobody afraid of freakin Arizona and Okie State. For instance:

Alabama twice (SEC Champs and Sugar Bowl), Ms State twice, Texas A&M,Ole Miss, Oklahoma State, Baylor

others - Illinois twice, Virginia, California, Boise State

I'd say somewhat tough is an understatement when your easiest OOC opponent is Colorado St.

Look I'm not saying CUSA teams haven't beat P5s ever. Just pointing out how rare it is and how ridiculous it is for someone to claim 3-4 CUSA teams could've taken down Arizona on the road. Nice list of P5 scalps you got there but how often do they happen, once or twice a decade? It's not likely is all I'm saying.

(09-28-2015 05:55 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-28-2015 10:44 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(09-27-2015 08:51 PM)SApuro Wrote:  

(09-27-2015 03:30 PM)STexMiner Wrote:  Definitely going to be interesting in the Sun Bowl. If UTEP has any shot at making a bowl, they're probably going to have go 3-1 against UTSA, UNT, and the Florida schools. And, as stated above, what exactly is UTSA? Are they 0-4 bad or just a victim of their schedule?

0-4 is 0-4 but insert any CUSA team into that schedule and how do they fair?

Anyone beating Arizona on the road?
Anyone beating Oklahoma St. on the road?
Anyone beating Kansas St?
Anyone beating Colorado St?

UTEP is a must win for the roadrunners or they'll be no one to cheer them on when they smash Tech in the dome.

Then again we're 0ffer so I'll just sit in this corner and wait until I'm spoken too.

Yes. CSU is not THAT good.. And AZ is definitely beatable. I feel that any of three or four teams in the league could beat at least two of those.

lol

Two of CUSA's best teams in WKU and MTSU lost to bad or average P5s in Indiana and Illinois. Marshall, another good team in CUSA, squeaked out a win against lowly Purdue at home. La Tech, an undisputed top two team in CUSA, couldn't pull off the win against a KState team that is supposed to be rebuilding and lost their starting QB in their season opener.

Sorry but until CUSA teams start pulling off wins like that it's unreasonable to say they'd be likely to beat Arizona on the road. CSU I agree about though, I'd favor CUSA's Top 3-4 teams in a game against them.

Wake up and smell what you are shoveling. We beat Purdue by 10 with a first year FBS qb.

Big whoop, you played teams close. You are the moral victory masters. I have heard your all's crap now for three years: "Oh look out for UTSA. We will be awesome, blah blah blah." You have yet to be productive in any way. Why don't you put a sock in it until you actually DO something?

And in case you are new to the college football world, the transitive property doesn't apply. So, yes, I think that there are three teams that could beat AZ or K-State and I don't care what you have to say.

(09-29-2015 08:34 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  Wake up and smell what you are shoveling. We beat Purdue by 10 with a first year FBS qb.

Big whoop, you played teams close. You are the moral victory masters. I have heard your all's crap now for three years: "Oh look out for UTSA. We will be awesome, blah blah blah." You have yet to be productive in any way. Why don't you put a sock in it until you actually DO something?

And in case you are new to the college football world, the transitive property doesn't apply. So, yes, I think that there are three teams that could beat AZ or K-State and I don't care what you have to say.

Any team can beat any team, theoretically. Actually doing it is a whole different thing. When's the last time you beat a Top 25 P5 team on the road? Probably not recently yet you think 3-4 CUSA teams would likely beat Arizona.

You're entitled to your opinion I'm just pointing out how unreasonable it is. BTW, UTSA was 6-2 in conference and 7-5 overall Year 1 which I'd consider pretty productive.

Well, it's not unreasonable since (using your logic) you "played them close" and I'd say that there are 3-4 (HA HA) better teams than UTSA in the west, let alone CUSA... So yes, using your logic, 3-4 teams could beat Arizona or KSU on the road. No so unreasonable.

Oh, year one.... Way to bend stats to support your argument. How did year 2 work out for you??? And year three? Nope, NOT productive.

Oh, and since you can't possibly fathom anyone playing these teams any better than the mighty Meep Meeps, then I will look for you in the CUSA Championship game against an East member... Somehow, I think I won't see you.

(09-29-2015 01:39 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  Well, it's not unreasonable since (using your logic) you "played them close" and I'd say that there are 3-4 (HA HA) better teams than UTSA in the west, let alone CUSA... So yes, using your logic, 3-4 teams could beat Arizona or KSU on the road. No so unreasonable.

Oh, year one.... Way to bend stats to support your argument. How did year 2 work out for you??? And year three? Nope, NOT productive.

Oh, and since you can't possibly fathom anyone playing these teams any better than the mighty Meep Meeps, then I will look for you in the CUSA Championship game against an East member... Somehow, I think I won't see you.

Who said noone in CUSA would play them close? I think several teams could, now as far as actually beating I wouldn't bet on it. There has been 1 G5 win (Toledo) on the road vs a Top 25 P5 team all season long--beating those teams is highly unlikely for everybody including UTSA.

Haha you're the one that said UTSA hasn't been productive in any way, genius. When you use the word any that encompasses all our years in CUSA so yes Year 1 counts. Year 2 was injury riddled and we sucked. This year we are 0-0 in conference play.

(09-29-2015 02:27 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 01:39 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  Well, it's not unreasonable since (using your logic) you "played them close" and I'd say that there are 3-4 (HA HA) better teams than UTSA in the west, let alone CUSA... So yes, using your logic, 3-4 teams could beat Arizona or KSU on the road. No so unreasonable.

Oh, year one.... Way to bend stats to support your argument. How did year 2 work out for you??? And year three? Nope, NOT productive.

Oh, and since you can't possibly fathom anyone playing these teams any better than the mighty Meep Meeps, then I will look for you in the CUSA Championship game against an East member... Somehow, I think I won't see you.

Who said noone in CUSA would play them close? I think several teams could, now as far as actually beating I wouldn't bet on it. There has been 1 G5 win (Toledo) on the road vs a Top 25 P5 team all season long--beating those teams is highly unlikely for everybody including UTSA.

Haha you're the one that said UTSA hasn't been productive in any way, genius. When you use the word any that encompasses all our years in CUSA so yes Year 1 counts. Year 2 was injury riddled and we sucked. This year we are 0-0 in conference play.

Okay you mental giant... Year one counts.. Okay...Then you guys are even worse (again, using your logic). You've slid backward... So I suppose you are right... You've been productive... COUNTER-productive to be precise. End of file.

(09-29-2015 02:44 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 02:27 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 01:39 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  Well, it's not unreasonable since (using your logic) you "played them close" and I'd say that there are 3-4 (HA HA) better teams than UTSA in the west, let alone CUSA... So yes, using your logic, 3-4 teams could beat Arizona or KSU on the road. No so unreasonable.

Oh, year one.... Way to bend stats to support your argument. How did year 2 work out for you??? And year three? Nope, NOT productive.

Oh, and since you can't possibly fathom anyone playing these teams any better than the mighty Meep Meeps, then I will look for you in the CUSA Championship game against an East member... Somehow, I think I won't see you.

Who said noone in CUSA would play them close? I think several teams could, now as far as actually beating I wouldn't bet on it. There has been 1 G5 win (Toledo) on the road vs a Top 25 P5 team all season long--beating those teams is highly unlikely for everybody including UTSA.

Haha you're the one that said UTSA hasn't been productive in any way, genius. When you use the word any that encompasses all our years in CUSA so yes Year 1 counts. Year 2 was injury riddled and we sucked. This year we are 0-0 in conference play.

Okay you mental giant... Year one counts.. Okay...Then you guys are even worse (again, using your logic). You've slid backward... So I suppose you are right... You've been productive... COUNTER-productive to be precise. End of file.

lol in that case so have you, genius. Marshall isn't as good as they were with Cato. Besides like I said we're 0-0 in conference so there's still a possibility we improve on last yr.

(09-29-2015 03:15 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 02:44 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 02:27 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 01:39 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  Well, it's not unreasonable since (using your logic) you "played them close" and I'd say that there are 3-4 (HA HA) better teams than UTSA in the west, let alone CUSA... So yes, using your logic, 3-4 teams could beat Arizona or KSU on the road. No so unreasonable.

Oh, year one.... Way to bend stats to support your argument. How did year 2 work out for you??? And year three? Nope, NOT productive.

Oh, and since you can't possibly fathom anyone playing these teams any better than the mighty Meep Meeps, then I will look for you in the CUSA Championship game against an East member... Somehow, I think I won't see you.

Who said noone in CUSA would play them close? I think several teams could, now as far as actually beating I wouldn't bet on it. There has been 1 G5 win (Toledo) on the road vs a Top 25 P5 team all season long--beating those teams is highly unlikely for everybody including UTSA.

Haha you're the one that said UTSA hasn't been productive in any way, genius. When you use the word any that encompasses all our years in CUSA so yes Year 1 counts. Year 2 was injury riddled and we sucked. This year we are 0-0 in conference play.

Okay you mental giant... Year one counts.. Okay...Then you guys are even worse (again, using your logic). You've slid backward... So I suppose you are right... You've been productive... COUNTER-productive to be precise. End of file.

lol in that case so have you, genius. Marshall isn't as good as they were with Cato. Besides like I said we're 0-0 in conference so there's still a possibility we improve on last yr.

Okay Boy Wonder, this isn't about Marshall. I never said that we were better this year. YOU are the little miniature rooster crowing atop your dung hill about what world beaters you are. We've heard that junk from you all for three years. It's meaningless until you actually do something. For God's sake man, your flagship win is over an 8-5 Houston team...

That being said, I do hope at the end of the year you do have some things to really hang your hat on because it would be good for not only UTSA, but for CUSA as well.

I sincerely hope that you do have a good season, but for you to just crow about this and that when you've been absolute crap for two years is ridiculous.

(09-30-2015 08:28 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 03:15 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 02:44 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 02:27 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 01:39 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  Well, it's not unreasonable since (using your logic) you "played them close" and I'd say that there are 3-4 (HA HA) better teams than UTSA in the west, let alone CUSA... So yes, using your logic, 3-4 teams could beat Arizona or KSU on the road. No so unreasonable.

Oh, year one.... Way to bend stats to support your argument. How did year 2 work out for you??? And year three? Nope, NOT productive.

Oh, and since you can't possibly fathom anyone playing these teams any better than the mighty Meep Meeps, then I will look for you in the CUSA Championship game against an East member... Somehow, I think I won't see you.

Who said noone in CUSA would play them close? I think several teams could, now as far as actually beating I wouldn't bet on it. There has been 1 G5 win (Toledo) on the road vs a Top 25 P5 team all season long--beating those teams is highly unlikely for everybody including UTSA.

Haha you're the one that said UTSA hasn't been productive in any way, genius. When you use the word any that encompasses all our years in CUSA so yes Year 1 counts. Year 2 was injury riddled and we sucked. This year we are 0-0 in conference play.

Okay you mental giant... Year one counts.. Okay...Then you guys are even worse (again, using your logic). You've slid backward... So I suppose you are right... You've been productive... COUNTER-productive to be precise. End of file.

lol in that case so have you, genius. Marshall isn't as good as they were with Cato. Besides like I said we're 0-0 in conference so there's still a possibility we improve on last yr.

Okay Boy Wonder, this isn't about Marshall. I never said that we were better this year. YOU are the little miniature rooster crowing atop your dung hill about what world beaters you are. We've heard that junk from you all for three years. It's meaningless until you actually do something. For God's sake man, your flagship win is over an 8-5 Houston team...

That being said, I do hope at the end of the year you do have some things to really hang your hat on because it would be good for not only UTSA, but for CUSA as well.

I sincerely hope that you do have a good season, but for you to just crow about this and that when you've been absolute crap for two years is ridiculous.

Do you normally resort to making chit up when your argument sucks? First you claim I said nobody could play the teams UTSA played as close as we did. Now you're rambling about how I think we're world beaters. Go to the CUSA power rankings thread, I have us 8th out of 13 teams--far from world beaters.

The only thing I've been doing is disputing your ridiculous claim that 3-4 CUSA teams would beat Arizona.

(09-30-2015 11:40 AM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 08:28 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 03:15 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 02:44 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 02:27 PM)correcamino Wrote:  Who said noone in CUSA would play them close? I think several teams could, now as far as actually beating I wouldn't bet on it. There has been 1 G5 win (Toledo) on the road vs a Top 25 P5 team all season long--beating those teams is highly unlikely for everybody including UTSA.

Haha you're the one that said UTSA hasn't been productive in any way, genius. When you use the word any that encompasses all our years in CUSA so yes Year 1 counts. Year 2 was injury riddled and we sucked. This year we are 0-0 in conference play.

Okay you mental giant... Year one counts.. Okay...Then you guys are even worse (again, using your logic). You've slid backward... So I suppose you are right... You've been productive... COUNTER-productive to be precise. End of file.

lol in that case so have you, genius. Marshall isn't as good as they were with Cato. Besides like I said we're 0-0 in conference so there's still a possibility we improve on last yr.

Okay Boy Wonder, this isn't about Marshall. I never said that we were better this year. YOU are the little miniature rooster crowing atop your dung hill about what world beaters you are. We've heard that junk from you all for three years. It's meaningless until you actually do something. For God's sake man, your flagship win is over an 8-5 Houston team...

That being said, I do hope at the end of the year you do have some things to really hang your hat on because it would be good for not only UTSA, but for CUSA as well.

I sincerely hope that you do have a good season, but for you to just crow about this and that when you've been absolute crap for two years is ridiculous.

Do you normally resort to making chit up when your argument sucks? First you claim I said nobody could play the teams UTSA played as close as we did. Now you're rambling about how I think we're world beaters. Go to the CUSA power rankings thread, I have us 8th out of 13 teams--far from world beaters.

The only thing I've been doing is disputing your ridiculous claim that 3-4 CUSA teams would beat Arizona.

I see comprehension isn't your strong suit, you stupid F***... I said they could beat them and would probably play them better than you. You are a retard. Period and end of story. Have fun in loser land.

Yall need a time out

(09-30-2015 12:29 PM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  Yall need a time out

I'm done with him... Play time is over. Trying to get him to understand anything is like trying to get an elephant to learn how to do microsurgery.

He'd fall into a barrel full of boobs and come up sucking his thumb...

(09-30-2015 12:09 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  I see comprehension isn't your strong suit, you stupid F***... I said they could beat them and would probably play them better than you. You are a retard. Period and end of story. Have fun in loser land.

lol "could"

There's a big difference between "could" and actually doing it, as evidenced by the fact that there has only been one G5 vs Top 25 P5 team win on the road all season long. More likely than not all CUSA teams would be 0-4 or 1-3 with our schedule. That's all I'm trying to get through to you.

Somehow you used that as a reason to make chit up about how I think UTSA are world beaters. Or to claim that UTSA hasn't shown any productivity, which you later backtracked on after I brought up Year 1. Now you're resorting to name calling. Way to win that argument, smart guy.

Enough is enough guys.