(07-30-2015 02:04 AM)emu79 Wrote: Just a point on scheduling here EMU traded the MSU game for two huge paydays from Missouri. The AD has to balance an athletic budget to support ALL EMU sports.
Again yes we have alot of work to do in football but lets not take the focus on the fact that we do have success in other sports.
CC needs to stay on track and needs our support. He has enough hills to climb. I think he's up to the heavy lifting it will take to move the program forward.
And, I mentioned it before, and others have confirmed that the way the MSU/EMU contract was written there was no incentive for MSU to even play at EMU.
As it was the last game in the series, all MSU had to do was pay a 500K fee for not playing the game (and, guys, this happens a lot in college sports, games are canceled and one team pays off the other esp as a contract which is say 5 - 8 years old is probably a bad contract for the team receiving the road game guarantee. Things have been changing a lot in college FB, esp money wise.).
So we would have gotten ZERO dollars for the 2016 game and 500K cancellation fee for 2020.
The way the contract was written: MSU keeps all monies from the 2016 game and EMU for the 2020 game.
So probably in say 2018 we would have gotten 500K for not hosting MSU in 2020. But in 2016 we would have gotten zero dollars.
So we get, in a sense, 500K for the 2016 game collectible in say 2018....
Heather instead gets what 1.2M (I forgot the exact amount, might be 1.25M) in 2016. Plus a like amount for the other Missouri game. A total of 2.5M.
Might also add, EMU can use those future contract revenues as pledge (collateral) to borrow monies for facilities improvements (that was done for the initial install of FieldTurf). FB improvements like lights, scoreboard, press box, etc. are big ticket items which can't be paid for out of a single year's budget. EMU athletics doesn't have capital reserves where they may hold a few millions for these big items.