The LGBT'ers opened this door

Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

Some rule broken? Or you siding with the gays who want the subject censored?

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

ABC News is homophobic?

I thought libs valued "choice".

Gays don't like gays who control themselves and choose not to act on their desires.

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Yes, it did point out gay hypocrisy. If you want to ignore that go ahead but don't make a false claim. And the people signing the petition and the woman from gladd are obviously wrong as evidenced by these men.

(01-10-2015 04:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Once again your ignorance is only exceeded by your inability to comprehend the English language.

(01-10-2015 04:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Are you kidding? A NEWS story from ABC is homophobic? A NEWS story?

And they did opine.

(01-10-2015 05:14 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Once again your ignorance is only exceeded by your inability to comprehend the English language.

Nope, conservatives just get this idea that their distorted views are the actual mainstream views.

In todays society, being anti gay =/= being pro gay. One professes intolerance, ignorance, & hate speech. the other professes equal rights and acceptance. Only one who doesn't understand that is the one who see's hypocrisy here.

and again I must stress, because reading comprehension is clearly not your strong point with my last post and the article. This link took absolutely no stance whatsoever INCLUDING "is this hypocritical" your own interpretation of the story came to that conclusion, not the article. Please get this important detail straight. It is a very important detail for you to understand. Resorting to name calling because you don't understand that point is only a sign of your own personal weakness.

(01-10-2015 05:16 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Are you kidding? A NEWS story from ABC is homophobic? A NEWS story?

lemme repost what I said earlier:

and again I must stress, because reading comprehension is clearly not your strong point with my last post and the article. This link took absolutely no stance whatsoever INCLUDING "is this hypocritical" your own interpretation of the story came to that conclusion, not the article. Please get this important detail straight. It is a very important detail for you to understand. Resorting to name calling because you don't understand that point is only a sign of your own personal weakness.

now you can insert homophobic for hypocritical to get the exact same answer. I dunno where you are getting homophobic or what you are even talking about with that word. Because clearly your use of the term is not the generally accepted use.

(01-10-2015 04:50 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Yes, it did point out gay hypocrisy. If you want to ignore that go ahead but don't make a false claim. And the people signing the petition and the woman from gladd are obviously wrong as evidenced by these men.

please cite, exactly which line the author makes the connection that this is hypocritical.

(01-10-2015 05:21 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 05:14 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Once again your ignorance is only exceeded by your inability to comprehend the English language.

Nope, conservatives just get this idea that their distorted views are the actual mainstream views.

In todays society, being anti gay =/= being pro gay. One professes intolerance, ignorance, & hate speech. the other professes equal rights and acceptance. Only one who doesn't understand that is the one who see's hypocrisy here.

and again I must stress, because reading comprehension is clearly not your strong point with my last post and the article. This link took absolutely no stance whatsoever INCLUDING "is this hypocritical" your own interpretation of the story came to that conclusion, not the article. Please get this important detail straight. It is a very important detail for you to understand. Resorting to name calling because you don't understand that point is only a sign of your own personal weakness.

Name calling? Now you're being silly. Nice deflection though.

(01-10-2015 05:26 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 05:21 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 05:14 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Once again your ignorance is only exceeded by your inability to comprehend the English language.

Nope, conservatives just get this idea that their distorted views are the actual mainstream views.

In todays society, being anti gay =/= being pro gay. One professes intolerance, ignorance, & hate speech. the other professes equal rights and acceptance. Only one who doesn't understand that is the one who see's hypocrisy here.

and again I must stress, because reading comprehension is clearly not your strong point with my last post and the article. This link took absolutely no stance whatsoever INCLUDING "is this hypocritical" your own interpretation of the story came to that conclusion, not the article. Please get this important detail straight. It is a very important detail for you to understand. Resorting to name calling because you don't understand that point is only a sign of your own personal weakness.

Name calling? Now you're being silly. Nice deflection though.

I'll remember that line the next time a con complains I am name calling when I use the word ignorant.

(01-10-2015 05:23 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 05:16 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 10:45 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Keep your homophobia on the WWE board.

What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Are you kidding? A NEWS story from ABC is homophobic? A NEWS story?

lemme repost what I said earlier:

and again I must stress, because reading comprehension is clearly not your strong point with my last post and the article. This link took absolutely no stance whatsoever INCLUDING "is this hypocritical" your own interpretation of the story came to that conclusion, not the article. Please get this important detail straight. It is a very important detail for you to understand. Resorting to name calling because you don't understand that point is only a sign of your own personal weakness.

now you can insert homophobic for hypocritical to get the exact same answer. I dunno where you are getting homophobic or what you are even talking about with that word. Because clearly your use of the term is not the generally accepted use.

See above. A lib threw it out there.

(01-10-2015 05:24 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:50 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Yes, it did point out gay hypocrisy. If you want to ignore that go ahead but don't make a false claim. And the people signing the petition and the woman from gladd are obviously wrong as evidenced by these men.

please cite, exactly which line the author makes the connection that this is hypocritical.

Um, they weren't intentionally pointing out the hypocrisy.

Only those with functioning brains picked up on it I suppose.

(01-10-2015 05:33 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 05:23 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 05:16 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(01-10-2015 04:30 PM)bevotex Wrote:  What homophobia? This is an ABC news article that points out the hypocrisy of the LGBT community. Is that against rules or did the article point out an uncomfortable truth?

the article didn't "point out" anything. it's a news story not an op ed, meaning it didn't take a particular stance or promote a certain position.

Are you kidding? A NEWS story from ABC is homophobic? A NEWS story?

lemme repost what I said earlier:

and again I must stress, because reading comprehension is clearly not your strong point with my last post and the article. This link took absolutely no stance whatsoever INCLUDING "is this hypocritical" your own interpretation of the story came to that conclusion, not the article. Please get this important detail straight. It is a very important detail for you to understand. Resorting to name calling because you don't understand that point is only a sign of your own personal weakness.

now you can insert homophobic for hypocritical to get the exact same answer. I dunno where you are getting homophobic or what you are even talking about with that word. Because clearly your use of the term is not the generally accepted use.

See above. A lib threw it out there.

Last i checked my name is john01992 and I didn't make that comment. And just an FYI you are acting like a four year old with the particular tactics you are using in this thread.