Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
geauxcajuns Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,723
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 181
I Root For: Louisiana
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 11:57 AM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I have no problem with the way the basketball tourney was done this year and would have no problem expanding it to the women's tourney.

In softball and baseball however I favor an 8 team DE tourney-- no byes, no single elimination. I guess if the game is televised we would have to go to the 2 pods of 4 teams each and have the championship game be a single game. Honestly I would rather see 1 8 team DE tourney with no pods however.

The Sun Belt has to be the only conference in the country to have done the softball tourney like it was done this year. I say scrap that format.

The problem with doing that in baseball is you get seasons like this one every now and then. Louisiana will play ULM for the 7th time in this season. This is in no way helping our RPI at all. Now if the #1 & 2 seeds were rewarded with a bye it could prevent possible RPI killers. Also I do not like the idea of 2 weekend series against the same opponent every year. Troy and South Al have the advantage here as bot programs are generally in the top 3 in the Sun Belt and extra games against each other help in the RPI as well as give each program the advantage of just having to knock each other off instead of relying on help from another school.
05-20-2014 12:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GaSoEagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,435
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 89
I Root For: Ga Southern
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
I am assuming with 11 teams next year teams will play each of the other 10--- 5 home and 5 away series. You won't be playing a team 6 times.

I guess I am just old school-- baseball tournaments are historically double elimination. The only way I would support single elimination is if all 11 teams get in and the top 5 get byes and 6-11 play a single game to get into the 8 team DE tourney. 6-11, 7-10 and 8-9 play each other on day 1 in a single elimination, then those 3 winners join teams 1-5 to make an 8 team DE tourney. Other than that I don't really like single eliminiation baseball or softball tournies.

Also Louisiana actually moved up from #8 to #7 in RPI (Warren Nolan) from before the season ending ULM series to now. I know that is a function somewhat of how teams above them did but playing ULM in the season ending series actually did not hurt Louisiana's RPI as it went up 1 spot.
(This post was last modified: 05-20-2014 12:28 PM by GaSoEagle.)
05-20-2014 12:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Saint3333 Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,422
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 854
I Root For: App State
Location:
Post: #23
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
Baseball has to be DE. The best team can run into the best pitcher and be knocked out.
05-20-2014 12:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,743
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1063
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 12:17 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 11:57 AM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I have no problem with the way the basketball tourney was done this year and would have no problem expanding it to the women's tourney.

In softball and baseball however I favor an 8 team DE tourney-- no byes, no single elimination. I guess if the game is televised we would have to go to the 2 pods of 4 teams each and have the championship game be a single game. Honestly I would rather see 1 8 team DE tourney with no pods however.

The Sun Belt has to be the only conference in the country to have done the softball tourney like it was done this year. I say scrap that format.

The problem with doing that in baseball is you get seasons like this one every now and then. Louisiana will play ULM for the 7th time in this season. This is in no way helping our RPI at all. Now if the #1 & 2 seeds were rewarded with a bye it could prevent possible RPI killers. Also I do not like the idea of 2 weekend series against the same opponent every year. Troy and South Al have the advantage here as bot programs are generally in the top 3 in the Sun Belt and extra games against each other help in the RPI as well as give each program the advantage of just having to knock each other off instead of relying on help from another school.

We are abandoning the playing your rival twice idea starting next season.

As for the Tourney...the issue is that you have everyone voting, and no 8 seed is going to agree to a crazy format just to help the 1 seed out. Most years, we have three or four highly rated teams, and it works out more fair.
05-20-2014 12:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AstroCajun Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 2,698
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 167
I Root For: UL Ragin Cajuns
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 12:28 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 12:17 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 11:57 AM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I have no problem with the way the basketball tourney was done this year and would have no problem expanding it to the women's tourney.

In softball and baseball however I favor an 8 team DE tourney-- no byes, no single elimination. I guess if the game is televised we would have to go to the 2 pods of 4 teams each and have the championship game be a single game. Honestly I would rather see 1 8 team DE tourney with no pods however.

The Sun Belt has to be the only conference in the country to have done the softball tourney like it was done this year. I say scrap that format.

The problem with doing that in baseball is you get seasons like this one every now and then. Louisiana will play ULM for the 7th time in this season. This is in no way helping our RPI at all. Now if the #1 & 2 seeds were rewarded with a bye it could prevent possible RPI killers. Also I do not like the idea of 2 weekend series against the same opponent every year. Troy and South Al have the advantage here as bot programs are generally in the top 3 in the Sun Belt and extra games against each other help in the RPI as well as give each program the advantage of just having to knock each other off instead of relying on help from another school.

We are abandoning the playing your rival twice idea starting next season.

As for the Tourney...the issue is that you have everyone voting, and no 8 seed is going to agree to a crazy format just to help the 1 seed out. Most years, we have three or four highly rated teams, and it works out more fair.

Tsk, tsk. Your the one that frequently suggests that the Cajuns act against self interest for some vague notion of "the good of the conference". Conference good is served by protecting its teams who are having good years.

We've been seeded all over the place and have even missed the tournament before too. But I wouldnt begrudge a conference mate who has a legit shot at hosting a regional and/or a super regional over a team that needed help to get in the tournament.
05-20-2014 04:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,743
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1063
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 04:57 PM)AstroCajun Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 12:28 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 12:17 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 11:57 AM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I have no problem with the way the basketball tourney was done this year and would have no problem expanding it to the women's tourney.

In softball and baseball however I favor an 8 team DE tourney-- no byes, no single elimination. I guess if the game is televised we would have to go to the 2 pods of 4 teams each and have the championship game be a single game. Honestly I would rather see 1 8 team DE tourney with no pods however.

The Sun Belt has to be the only conference in the country to have done the softball tourney like it was done this year. I say scrap that format.

The problem with doing that in baseball is you get seasons like this one every now and then. Louisiana will play ULM for the 7th time in this season. This is in no way helping our RPI at all. Now if the #1 & 2 seeds were rewarded with a bye it could prevent possible RPI killers. Also I do not like the idea of 2 weekend series against the same opponent every year. Troy and South Al have the advantage here as bot programs are generally in the top 3 in the Sun Belt and extra games against each other help in the RPI as well as give each program the advantage of just having to knock each other off instead of relying on help from another school.

We are abandoning the playing your rival twice idea starting next season.

As for the Tourney...the issue is that you have everyone voting, and no 8 seed is going to agree to a crazy format just to help the 1 seed out. Most years, we have three or four highly rated teams, and it works out more fair.

Tsk, tsk. Your the one that frequently suggests that the Cajuns act against self interest for some vague notion of "the good of the conference". Conference good is served by protecting its teams who are having good years.

We've been seeded all over the place and have even missed the tournament before too. But I wouldnt begrudge a conference mate who has a legit shot at hosting a regional and/or a super regional over a team that needed help to get in the tournament.

I'm just telling you it will never pass because no coach is going to agree to making their SBC Tourney run harder.

You guys have a regional host locked up. Its the National Seed you need help with, and that will be decided well before that final game Sunday.
05-20-2014 05:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrazyCajun Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,317
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation: 60
I Root For: Louisiana
Location:
Post: #27
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 05:06 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 04:57 PM)AstroCajun Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 12:28 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 12:17 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 11:57 AM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I have no problem with the way the basketball tourney was done this year and would have no problem expanding it to the women's tourney.

In softball and baseball however I favor an 8 team DE tourney-- no byes, no single elimination. I guess if the game is televised we would have to go to the 2 pods of 4 teams each and have the championship game be a single game. Honestly I would rather see 1 8 team DE tourney with no pods however.

The Sun Belt has to be the only conference in the country to have done the softball tourney like it was done this year. I say scrap that format.

The problem with doing that in baseball is you get seasons like this one every now and then. Louisiana will play ULM for the 7th time in this season. This is in no way helping our RPI at all. Now if the #1 & 2 seeds were rewarded with a bye it could prevent possible RPI killers. Also I do not like the idea of 2 weekend series against the same opponent every year. Troy and South Al have the advantage here as bot programs are generally in the top 3 in the Sun Belt and extra games against each other help in the RPI as well as give each program the advantage of just having to knock each other off instead of relying on help from another school.

We are abandoning the playing your rival twice idea starting next season.

As for the Tourney...the issue is that you have everyone voting, and no 8 seed is going to agree to a crazy format just to help the 1 seed out. Most years, we have three or four highly rated teams, and it works out more fair.

Tsk, tsk. Your the one that frequently suggests that the Cajuns act against self interest for some vague notion of "the good of the conference". Conference good is served by protecting its teams who are having good years.

We've been seeded all over the place and have even missed the tournament before too. But I wouldnt begrudge a conference mate who has a legit shot at hosting a regional and/or a super regional over a team that needed help to get in the tournament.

I'm just telling you it will never pass because no coach is going to agree to making their SBC Tourney run harder.

You guys have a regional host locked up. Its the National Seed you need help with, and that will be decided well before that final game Sunday.

If the Cajuns are in the SBC tourney Chmpionship game Sunday, more than likely we've done enough over the week to get that national seed.
05-20-2014 05:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrazyCajun Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,317
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation: 60
I Root For: Louisiana
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 04:57 PM)AstroCajun Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 12:28 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 12:17 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  
(05-20-2014 11:57 AM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I have no problem with the way the basketball tourney was done this year and would have no problem expanding it to the women's tourney.

In softball and baseball however I favor an 8 team DE tourney-- no byes, no single elimination. I guess if the game is televised we would have to go to the 2 pods of 4 teams each and have the championship game be a single game. Honestly I would rather see 1 8 team DE tourney with no pods however.

The Sun Belt has to be the only conference in the country to have done the softball tourney like it was done this year. I say scrap that format.

The problem with doing that in baseball is you get seasons like this one every now and then. Louisiana will play ULM for the 7th time in this season. This is in no way helping our RPI at all. Now if the #1 & 2 seeds were rewarded with a bye it could prevent possible RPI killers. Also I do not like the idea of 2 weekend series against the same opponent every year. Troy and South Al have the advantage here as bot programs are generally in the top 3 in the Sun Belt and extra games against each other help in the RPI as well as give each program the advantage of just having to knock each other off instead of relying on help from another school.

We are abandoning the playing your rival twice idea starting next season.

As for the Tourney...the issue is that you have everyone voting, and no 8 seed is going to agree to a crazy format just to help the 1 seed out. Most years, we have three or four highly rated teams, and it works out more fair.

Tsk, tsk. Your the one that frequently suggests that the Cajuns act against self interest for some vague notion of "the good of the conference". Conference good is served by protecting its teams who are having good years.

We've been seeded all over the place and have even missed the tournament before too. But I wouldnt begrudge a conference mate who has a legit shot at hosting a regional and/or a super regional over a team that needed help to get in the tournament.

Isn’t it amazing, State fans have become experts on what is best for the conference and every other program in the conference. Chiefans is especially adept at lecturing Cajun fans and begrudgingly giving the UL program credit for any accomplishment.
05-20-2014 05:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CatMom Online
Getting Old Sucks!
*

Posts: 11,024
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 316
I Root For: TXST
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Post: #29
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
To those that claim a DE for baseball always entails pods, that's not true. The SLC did not use pods when we were in it. It was straight winners played winners and losers played in the losers bracket; to return to the winners bracket. No sides.
Example:
1/8
2/7
3/6
4/5
I chose winners for examples' sake

(game 5)loser game 1 plays loser game 2 (elimination)
(game 6)loser game 3 plays loser game 4 (elimination)
2/8
4/6
team 6 & 8 sent packing

(game 7) winner game 1 plays winner game 2
(game 8) winner game 3 plays winner game 4
1/7
3/5

winner game 5 plays loser game 7
winner game 6 plays loser game 8
(game 9)2/1
(game 10)5/4
4 sent packing
undefeated 1 & 5 get a day off

Losers bracket
(game 11) 2/3
(game 12) 5/7
teams 2 & 7 are out

(game 13) 3 plays 5
(game 14) 3 plays 5
5 is out

Championship game - 1 vs 3

Don't say it doesn't happen like this because I've seen it except the 1 seed lost their first game and came back
05-20-2014 06:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,743
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1063
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 06:28 PM)CatMom Wrote:  To those that claim a DE for baseball always entails pods, that's not true. The SLC did not use pods when we were in it. It was straight winners played winners and losers played in the losers bracket; to return to the winners bracket. No sides.
Example:
1/8
2/7
3/6
4/5
I chose winners for examples' sake

(game 5)loser game 1 plays loser game 2 (elimination)
(game 6)loser game 3 plays loser game 4 (elimination)
2/8
4/6
team 6 & 8 sent packing

(game 7) winner game 1 plays winner game 2
(game 8) winner game 3 plays winner game 4
1/7
3/5

winner game 5 plays loser game 7
winner game 6 plays loser game 8
(game 9)2/1
(game 10)5/4
4 sent packing
undefeated 1 & 5 get a day off

Losers bracket
(game 11) 2/3
(game 12) 5/7
teams 2 & 7 are out

(game 13) 3 plays 5
(game 14) 3 plays 5
5 is out

Championship game - 1 vs 3

Don't say it doesn't happen like this because I've seen it except the 1 seed lost their first game and came back

Uhh...that is a pod system.
05-20-2014 06:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CatMom Online
Getting Old Sucks!
*

Posts: 11,024
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 316
I Root For: TXST
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Post: #31
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
I just used winners/losers. No, it wasn't a pod system.. Unless you consider 1 pod a pod system Seriously, I was at several of them. They didn't use pods. Just because my example worked out that way. I was just trying to get an example up. 03-banghead
They did, however, go to the 2 pod system in 2013; after we left. The reason stated was the possibility of the championship game getting on TV.

Dang I wish I still had a program from one of those.
(This post was last modified: 05-20-2014 08:12 PM by CatMom.)
05-20-2014 06:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GaSoEagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,435
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 89
I Root For: Ga Southern
Location:
Post: #32
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
With no pod system the negative is that when you get to the championship game you could see a 2nd championship game if the team with a loss beat the no-loss team in the first game.

That being said I like the no-pod system better also. It is just a hard sell if the championship game is going to be on TV.
05-20-2014 08:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CatMom Online
Getting Old Sucks!
*

Posts: 11,024
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 316
I Root For: TXST
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Post: #33
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 08:10 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  With no pod system the negative is that when you get to the championship game you could see a 2nd championship game if the team with a loss beat the no-loss team in the first game.

That being said I like the no-pod system better also. It is just a hard sell if the championship game is going to be on TV.

Yeah, we had that in 2011. It was an roller coaster and a thrill all wrapped into one long day. That we won both of those games only enhances my fond memories of that tourney.
05-20-2014 08:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CajunExpress Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,914
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 23
I Root For: Louisiana
Location:
Post: #34
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-19-2014 09:19 PM)CatMom Wrote:  1. 9
2. play each team twice H/A
3. who wants to play us OOC? Get top teams on the phone and get them scheduled. Get rid of non D1 games, no exceptions
4. Less teams, not more. Bye for 1st place except baseball, softball. Softball needs to cut that crap out they did this year. Double elimination like the rest of the NCAA tourney. Softball/baseball, DE. All the rest, single elimination.

There, problems solved.

1:8 games max.
2: sixteen games, figure out how to balance it.
3: No non division one teams seems fine to say, but getting those teams is not, unless you want to be road warriors.
4: Softball has an ideal set up. Weak teams get an opportunity, one opportunity. This protects the doers. UL got a national seed because it was that close. Playing some really bad teams would have killed our RPI, and no doubt softball follows RPI almost exclusively. SEC also today is playing single elimination for the weaker team. Baseball needs this format just like softball did. ULM has no business getting two loses.
05-20-2014 09:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BruceMcF Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,178
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 785
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #35
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
So softball is:

G1: #6 v #7 (Single Elimination)
G2: #5 v #8 (Single Elimination)

G3: W1 v #3
G4: W2 v #4

G5: W3 v #1
G6: W4 v #2

G7: L5 v L6
G8: W5 v W6
G9: W7 v L8

G10: W8 v W9 (Winner take all)

But that is for eight softball teams, with the single elimination round basically fitting eight teams into a six team bracket. The equivalent of that first round for an 11 team baseball conference is indeed the the system where #6-#11 play three single elimination games and then are seeded into spots #6, #7 and #8 into some eight team bracket.

If y'all want to be innovative once its down to eight teams, go for it.
05-20-2014 10:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,743
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1063
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #36
RE: Scheduling a big issue at conference meetings
(05-20-2014 06:43 PM)CatMom Wrote:  I just used winners/losers. No, it wasn't a pod system.. Unless you consider 1 pod a pod system Seriously, I was at several of them. They didn't use pods. Just because my example worked out that way. I was just trying to get an example up. 03-banghead
They did, however, go to the 2 pod system in 2013; after we left. The reason stated was the possibility of the championship game getting on TV.

Dang I wish I still had a program from one of those.

Southland was using a pod system in 2012...last year you were in the league. Must have changed it after 2011.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Southl...Tournament
05-21-2014 12:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.