(01-26-2014 02:19 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:02 PM)Curtisc83 Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 01:54 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 01:22 PM)Burn the Horse Wrote:  I fear it is our doom as a forum community to be subjected to this type of silliness forever. We will always have a random FCS homer coming over to tell us how great his team is and teasing us with some "secret knowledge."

Maybe I was told a lie. I can't imagine why. Current theories on the 12th team is not adding up. Therefore something else is being cooked up.

Since your info doesn't have anything to do with OPSEC or national security you could just tell the board what schools you're talking about. Maybe that's just crazy talk but this is just a forum.

I might get accused of pimping my fcs. lol.

Do you believe the invite is imminent?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(01-26-2014 01:46 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  I have read this forum for a long time with the hope someone here has the know. So far, nothing.
Nobody has the answer. Except for wishful thinking. JMU does not seem to want the 12th spot as things stand today. So now what is the SBC to do? stuck at 11 forever?
I stumbled across some info. that, IMO, trashes the 1 school 12th invite. I think the SBC will invite 2 or more. A JMU invite might require a school of JMU liking to join.

Towson? UD?

(01-26-2014 02:23 PM)Curtisc83 Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:19 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:02 PM)Curtisc83 Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 01:54 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 01:22 PM)Burn the Horse Wrote:  I fear it is our doom as a forum community to be subjected to this type of silliness forever. We will always have a random FCS homer coming over to tell us how great his team is and teasing us with some "secret knowledge."

Maybe I was told a lie. I can't imagine why. Current theories on the 12th team is not adding up. Therefore something else is being cooked up.

Since your info doesn't have anything to do with OPSEC or national security you could just tell the board what schools you're talking about. Maybe that's just crazy talk but this is just a forum.

I might get accused of pimping my fcs. lol.

Might be the lesser evil. Right now you're being taken as delusional.

Pretty much. If he thinks he knows something he should just say it...

Lamar... love it or leave it, that is what I heard which is why I think there will be a 13th and/or 14th.

(01-26-2014 02:33 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  Lamar... love it or leave it, that is what I heard which is why I think there will be a 13th and/or 14th.

Been discussed. Lamar has been telling recruits for ages they are headed our way. The fact is that there is no way ASU and ULL would allow Lamar to join.

I am not honestly sure that Texas State would want them either.

(01-26-2014 02:33 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  Lamar... love it or leave it, that is what I heard which is why I think there will be a 13th and/or 14th.

Cajuns would have to sign off on it, and I don't see that happening.

Think you got fed a big load of BS.

The Borg are making noise again...so I hear...

(01-26-2014 02:38 PM)panama Wrote:  The Borg are making noise again...so I hear...

Resistance is futile.

(01-26-2014 02:36 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:33 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  Lamar... love it or leave it, that is what I heard which is why I think there will be a 13th and/or 14th.

Been discussed. Lamar has been telling recruits for ages they are headed our way. The fact is that there is no way ASU and ULL would allow Lamar to join.

I am not honestly sure that Texas State would want them either.

That is your bias opinion. ULL already said they would vote yes on Lamar. Texas st and Lamar are both part of the TSU system. If you don't want Lamar, fine, but don't make up stuff.

(01-26-2014 03:24 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:36 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:33 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  Lamar... love it or leave it, that is what I heard which is why I think there will be a 13th and/or 14th.

Been discussed. Lamar has been telling recruits for ages they are headed our way. The fact is that there is no way ASU and ULL would allow Lamar to join.

I am not honestly sure that Texas State would want them either.

That is your bias opinion. ULL already said they would vote yes on Lamar. Texas st and Lamar are both part of the TSU system. If you don't want Lamar, fine, but don't make up stuff.

If ULL changed their minds, then it will be a real shock to all, because they've been very adamant about No Southland invites. The fact is that as of a few months ago, teams like Sam Houston and Lamar were being blocked by ULL and ASU.

No to Lamar

(01-26-2014 03:24 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  That is your bias opinion. ULL already said they would vote yes on Lamar. Texas st and Lamar are both part of the TSU system. If you don't want Lamar, fine, but don't make up stuff.

Where has the Cajuns said they would vote yes on Lamar?

What does Texas State and Lamar being part of the TSUS have to do with us voting them in?

(01-26-2014 03:47 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 03:24 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:36 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:33 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  Lamar... love it or leave it, that is what I heard which is why I think there will be a 13th and/or 14th.

Been discussed. Lamar has been telling recruits for ages they are headed our way. The fact is that there is no way ASU and ULL would allow Lamar to join.

I am not honestly sure that Texas State would want them either.

That is your bias opinion. ULL already said they would vote yes on Lamar. Texas st and Lamar are both part of the TSU system. If you don't want Lamar, fine, but don't make up stuff.

If ULL changed their minds, then it will be a real shock to all, because they've been very adamant about No Southland invites. The fact is that as of a few months ago, teams like Sam Houston and Lamar were being blocked by ULL and ASU.

It was ASU suggesting no SLC move ups, not ULL. I think the meaning was blown out of context by the net. Lamar and ULL/ASU are old rivals from both the SLC and SBC.

Where does it say they would not? I've heard that from fans on here a thousand times so I as the same question to you? Link please.

(01-26-2014 04:22 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 03:47 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 03:24 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:36 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 02:33 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  Lamar... love it or leave it, that is what I heard which is why I think there will be a 13th and/or 14th.

Been discussed. Lamar has been telling recruits for ages they are headed our way. The fact is that there is no way ASU and ULL would allow Lamar to join.

I am not honestly sure that Texas State would want them either.

That is your bias opinion. ULL already said they would vote yes on Lamar. Texas st and Lamar are both part of the TSU system. If you don't want Lamar, fine, but don't make up stuff.

If ULL changed their minds, then it will be a real shock to all, because they've been very adamant about No Southland invites. The fact is that as of a few months ago, teams like Sam Houston and Lamar were being blocked by ULL and ASU.

It was ASU suggesting no SLC move ups, not ULL. I think the meaning was blown out of context by the net. Lamar and ULL/ASU are old rivals from both the SLC and SBC.

Yeah, I am very aware that we used to be rivals. That doesn't mean we want to re start that rivalry. We play you guys every year in basketball...that should be enough for now.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provost_Umphrey_Stadium

Looks like Lakewood Stadium (high school) in Atlanta

No

(01-26-2014 04:22 PM)cleburneslim Wrote:  Where does it say they would not? I've heard that from fans on here a thousand times so I as the same question to you? Link please.

I lend more credence to those actually affiliated with the school than someone who has something to gain by claiming the contrary.

Cajun fans gain nothing by saying "the administration will not vote for an SLC team".

(01-26-2014 04:09 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 03:24 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  That is your bias opinion. ULL already said they would vote yes on Lamar. Texas st and Lamar are both part of the TSU system. If you don't want Lamar, fine, but don't make up stuff.

Where has the Cajuns said they would vote yes on Lamar?

What does Texas State and Lamar being part of the TSUS have to do with us voting them in?

Are you serious? TSUS will allow TSU to block another TSUS school from moving up. OK. If you oppose Lamar, just say it, don't make stuff up.

(01-26-2014 04:28 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 04:22 PM)cleburneslim Wrote:  Where does it say they would not? I've heard that from fans on here a thousand times so I as the same question to you? Link please.

I lend more credence to those actually affiliated with the school than someone who has something to gain by claiming the contrary.

Cajun fans gain nothing by saying "the administration will not vote for an SLC team".

Thats not evidence, still conjecture
truth is there is no evidence of it.

(01-26-2014 04:29 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 04:09 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(01-26-2014 03:24 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  That is your bias opinion. ULL already said they would vote yes on Lamar. Texas st and Lamar are both part of the TSU system. If you don't want Lamar, fine, but don't make up stuff.

Where has the Cajuns said they would vote yes on Lamar?

What does Texas State and Lamar being part of the TSUS have to do with us voting them in?

Are you serious? TSUS will allow TSU to block another TSUS school from moving up. OK. If you oppose Lamar, just say it, don't make stuff up.

yeah and we don't want SHSU either. Another TSUS school. The Regents can't dictate what the AD and Pres of TXST do or don't do as regards to their athletics.