http://bleacherreport.com/articles/19140...son/page/3

The bleacher report has done it again... Ranked SBC last in pre bowl said we were underdogs by a lot in both games and we were garbage... Unwilling to right their wrong they simply moved us past the Mac and said the coosa was still ahead and said coosa was 3-2 not 3-3 and gave a glowing report on how good they are?...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

reason?

Bleacher Report

It is bleacher report don't expect credibility.

You had me at "Bleacher Report."

I refuse to click on any link to the bleacher report as I don't want to give them the page view. It's the worst sports "reporting" website by far.

We go 4-1 during the season against CUSA during the season, 3-0 against MAC and 2-0 against MWC, beat CUSA and MAC in bowls and we are garbage. Good solid reporting there.

Isn't Bleacher Report full of people whose only qualification for writing those columns is that they watched football at least twice?

(01-08-2014 10:03 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Isn't Bleacher Report full of people whose only qualification for writing those columns is that they watched football at least twice?

No, that's for their management.

Crazy things are written on the internet from mommy's basement.

It's on the internet. Must be true...

Bleacher Report has come a long way, in that I mean on multiple occasions I've heard correspondents from BR do guest spots on nationally syndicated sports talk on occasion and on local talk frequently and they are usually decent guests, having said that, the site is still largely a joke. Good reads are rare and slideshows are obnoxious.

They have more credibility than they did two years ago, but that's only because they've gone from none, to next to none.

(01-08-2014 11:45 PM)bamaEagle Wrote:  It's on the internet. Must be true...

Much of their stuff is written by this guy. Bonjour.

Realistically you can make stats look any type of way you want to. I don't know how you expect to have a much better ranking with 2 wins over Ball State and Tulane... and then regular season wins over UAB, a one win Southern Miss, etc. Does anyone really believe that the ACC is a better football conference than the SEC because Florida State beat Auburn? Just sayin...

(01-09-2014 09:50 AM)AlwaysSunny Wrote:  Realistically you can make stats look any type of way you want to. I don't know how you expect to have a much better ranking with 2 wins over Ball State and Tulane... and then regular season wins over UAB, a one win Southern Miss, etc. Does anyone really believe that the ACC is a better football conference than the SEC because Florida State beat Auburn? Just sayin...

Top to bottom the SBC was better than CUSA. There was just a lot of parity in the SBC this year, meanwhile the better teams on CUSA and MAC feasted on a bunch of horrible teams.