(12-03-2013 01:17 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  Talk is that Oregon State will sit at home this year. Beavers have lost like 6 straight or something. That would mean only one open PAC 12...and that is only guaranteed if Oregon or the Arizona State/Stanford loser don't make the BCS.

I watched them play a few nights ago..they dont look bad..that game against oregon made my eyes hurt.

For the record, a bowl eligible CUSA team will not be bowling this year (FAU). If UTSA were eligible, there would be 2 bowl eligible CUSA teams not bowling.

(12-03-2013 08:24 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  For the record, a bowl eligible CUSA team will not be bowling this year (FAU). If UTSA were eligible, there would be 2 bowl eligible CUSA teams not bowling.

But at least 6 will be

(12-03-2013 08:34 PM)wkuhilltopperfan Wrote:  

(12-03-2013 08:24 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  For the record, a bowl eligible CUSA team will not be bowling this year (FAU). If UTSA were eligible, there would be 2 bowl eligible CUSA teams not bowling.

But at least 6 will be

Very true, but a 6-6 WKU in CUSA might not be bowling this year anyway.

(12-03-2013 10:16 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-03-2013 08:34 PM)wkuhilltopperfan Wrote:  

(12-03-2013 08:24 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  For the record, a bowl eligible CUSA team will not be bowling this year (FAU). If UTSA were eligible, there would be 2 bowl eligible CUSA teams not bowling.

But at least 6 will be

Very true, but a 6-6 WKU in CUSA might not be bowling this year anyway.

Everybody claims the Belt is a stronger Conference. So WKU would more than likely have a even better record...... Right? I think we would have fished 7-5 8-4 in CUSA this year and I believe the top five in the Belt and CUSA are close