RE: PAC 12 Championship at school site
Here's a look at demand via stub hub.
The BCS leagues:
Big Ten: 2,913 available. Lowest are $135 (one single ticket is up there for $120). Highest is $10,000.
ACC: 3,972 available. Lowest are $10 and highest is $999.
SEC: 4,628 available. Lowest are $180 and highest is $24,000 (yikes).
Pac 12 game (at Arizona State). 3,127 available. Lowest is $52 and highest is $1,000.
The non BCS games:
MAC (Detroit): 0 tickets available. SELLOUT! Anybody know what the deal is, nothing comes up when I type in Bowling Green or Northern Illinois, either? I know plenty of good seats are available being that it's in a 60,000 seat stadium. But I figured some of the premo seats would have shown up. Though maybe that means that NIU and BG fans already have gobbled all those up and aren't selling.
Mountain West (at Fresno State). 410 available. Lowest is $20 and highest is $175. Makes sense that so little remain. It's a home game and Fresno has either sold out, or come close to selling out, its 41,000 seat stadium all year.
CUSA (at Rice). 13 available. Lowest is $58. Highest is $75. All 13 are lower 50-yardline tickets. Like the MAC (even though its a home game), its being played in a big stadium, so plenty of good seats will be available at the gate. But surprising that there are some tickets on stub hub (though it could be Rice fans trying to off these premo tickets to Marshall fans).
Overall, these championship games seem like a mixed bag in terms of demand.
For this year, the Big Ten and SEC are in huge demand, and it makes sense to play it on a neutral field.
The ACC game, which has been an abomination, is being saved being that its in Charlotte and Duke is there, along with a Florida State team that is going for a title-game appearance. Still, seeing that there are a ton of seats available for dirt cheap (hundreds for less than $15 on stubhub) shows that the ACC may be better off going the Pac 12 rout. This is the league's perfect storm and it's only going to be respectable at best.
The Pac 12 obviously made the right decision to play it at a host site. The demand for that game is somewhere between the ACC and Big Ten. The only realistic "neutral" stadium would be Candlestick, and even with Stanford playing in the game, doubt demand would be nearly as high as it is at ASU.
As for the non-BCS schools. The Mountain West is going to benefit from it being at Fresno State (big stadium with a big fan base). Like the Pac 12, they could put it in Candlestick (San Fran) ... or even Qualcom (San Diego), but it would sap attendance big time. The league is so spread out, it's tough to travel.
Same with CUSA. While, technically, having the game at Relient would be no different than having it at Rice this year, since a Houston team is involved. But if it was say Marshall/ECU vs. Tulsa, a game in Houston would be a ghost town. Again, CUSA has to have it at a host site.
The MAC is really the only non-BCS league that could realistically hold the title game at a neutral site, NFL stadium, due to how compact the league is. For the most part, Ford Field (even if half empty) will draw as well as a home team's capacity. ... and this year, probably more. Plus, playing a game in the NFL stadium gives a "big-time" feel ... hence why the SEC has been doing it for years, even though every team in the league has a capable stadium to hold a game of this magnitude. Unless the games in Detroit start drawing 10,000, it's the best venue for the game. ... Kind of like the Q in Cleveland for hoops.
Overall, for both football and basketball, the league has made the right choice by bringing its title games to professional venues.
|