(10-07-2013 02:30 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 02:01 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 01:58 PM)statefanatic Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 01:57 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  Perhaps to reconsider Idaho with the full FBS division gaining momentum? I don't think you want Idaho for all sports.

They are football only.

Yes, I know. But if the Full FBS division comes, Idaho is going to bang the door down to stay in FBS by demanding a full invite into the Sunbelt. They won't be able to stay in 2 different divisions.

Banging on the door won't make it happen.

If it did, I would've been at Scarlett Johansson's door LONG ago.

You got that right

(10-07-2013 02:53 PM)OsageJ Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 02:05 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(10-07-2013 01:57 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  Perhaps to reconsider Idaho with the full FBS division gaining momentum? I don't think you want Idaho for all sports.

We cant and will not expel anyone. We'll hold Idaho football until they either get themselves into the MWC, or choose to drop to FCS.

The American South expelled UTPanAm..Big East got rid of Temple-once so why couldn't we get rid of Idaho? Having said that I don't really want to.

JMO, but the SBC needs to be an All Sport Conference. We don't need schools that don't have football. Don't know why we added UTA to go along with UALR. They should create a conference with other schools that don't have football, like UNO. We should have added NMSU as an All Sports member and added JMU, perhaps instead of Idaho for football only.