(07-17-2013 10:27 AM)brizzock Wrote: Depth, talent, experience, scheme, SIZE, speed, and health all factor in my 6-5 prediction. We're a far cry from 2008 IMO. That being said, I'm rooting for an undefeated season.
Just trying to determine your reasoning for the list above.
If you're trying to say the 2008 team had far greater size, I believe you are wrong. The 2008 team had a smaller d-line than what we're projected, by a fair amount at that. The linebackers are about the same. The only difference between the O-lines is really one player from the 2008 squad, a 335lb OT, Terrence Apted.
Speed-wise, are we really any slower than the 2008 team? There are two positions that are obvious, Landers was far faster than Birdsong, not even close, and in the return game we had Scotty. Other than that, I don't believe the speed difference is there, but that could be considered a big enough difference. We obviously won't be asking Birdsong to do the same things as Landers.
Depth, yeah, I'd agree we don't appear to have much depth, not sure how it compares to 2008.
Talent, not sure how to measure this outside of size, speed, and technique, but it feels like our recruiting classes were rated just as good as the ones that built the 2008 team.
Experience, goes back to depth, just not a bunch there. Probably need some rFr to step up in the rotation.
Health, we lost a few guys to injury as usual. Not sure how it compares to 2008.
Scheme, 2008 scheme only worked because of Landers, I wouldn't say it was a great scheme, since it only worked for a once in a lifetime player. This year is TBD.
All in all, I don't think we're in bad shape. Our biggest problem has been coaching attrition. Luckily, this year we have some pretty good names coming in.
EDIT: Just to caveat, I grabbed most of the roster info and size info off of JMUsports.com, and based starters on what was written in bio's. Not sure if it's 100% accurate.