Out with the old: "A"

In with the new:

Hate 'em much, Mark? LOL

(05-29-2013 01:51 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Hate 'em much, Mark? LOL

That's an established fact right there. But many Rutgers fans go out of there way to go after him, so I don't often blame him.

(05-29-2013 03:37 PM)brista21 Wrote:  

(05-29-2013 01:51 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Hate 'em much, Mark? LOL

That's an established fact right there. But many Rutgers fans go out of there way to go after him, so I don't often blame him.

It was obviously TIC...and in reality it is more gross incompetence in due diligence than anything else. The verbal and physical abuse was disturbing but in reality I've seen worse.

Hopefully, NJ Gov't ends this charade and fires several leaders and pull back the offer on the new AD. Rutgers needs a fresh start when it joins the B1G in '14.

I would guess the anti-sports faculty contingent at Rutgers is locked in a closet somewhere. Or maybe they're buried in the end zone at MetLife Stadium.

I can't imagine why they've been silent throughout all this.

(05-29-2013 01:51 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Hate 'em much, Mark? LOL

Actually he is right.

(05-29-2013 05:22 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I would guess the anti-sports faculty contingent at Rutgers is locked in a closet somewhere. Or maybe they're buried in the end zone at MetLife Stadium.

I can't imagine why they've been silent throughout all this.

They're academics. It's summer. You do the math.

I'm actually disappointed their website hasn't been updated since the Rice firing.

(05-29-2013 04:01 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(05-29-2013 03:37 PM)brista21 Wrote:  

(05-29-2013 01:51 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Hate 'em much, Mark? LOL

That's an established fact right there. But many Rutgers fans go out of there way to go after him, so I don't often blame him.

It was obviously TIC...and in reality it is more gross incompetence in due diligence than anything else. The verbal and physical abuse was disturbing but in reality I've seen worse.

Hopefully, NJ Gov't ends this charade and fires several leaders and pull back the offer on the new AD. Rutgers needs a fresh start when it joins the B1G in '14.

I know you mean no harm by it. And I agree, but so far Christie is "standing by his man."

(05-30-2013 12:14 AM)RUJohnny99 Wrote:  

(05-29-2013 05:22 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I would guess the anti-sports faculty contingent at Rutgers is locked in a closet somewhere. Or maybe they're buried in the end zone at MetLife Stadium.

I can't imagine why they've been silent throughout all this.

They're academics. It's summer. You do the math.

Besides, the ones who have math skills know that they lost the war. This helps them win their argument, about what the proper role of athletics in a university is, corruption and distortion of priorities etc etc etc, but that's all irrelevant now with Rutgers joining the BiG.

Just read this, could Rutgers be headed back AAC?
http://atlanticcoastconfidential.com/201...placement/

(05-30-2013 11:28 AM)CK42NC Wrote:  Just read this, could Rutgers be headed back AAC?
http://atlanticcoastconfidential.com/201...placement/

No way in hell. Rutgers was added because of NYC, not because of their school or athletic department. Things will not change because of these scandals.

Edit: Upon actually reading this, it is obviously a joke. Why would you post this crap?

(05-30-2013 11:31 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(05-30-2013 11:28 AM)CK42NC Wrote:  Just read this, could Rutgers be headed back AAC?
http://atlanticcoastconfidential.com/201...placement/

No way in hell. Rutgers was added because of NYC, not because of their school or athletic department. Things will not change because of these scandals.

Edit: Upon actually reading this, it is obviously a joke. Why would you post this crap?

Why you so upset? The title of the thread is "The Scarlett Letter"
C'mon really, I'm looking for more info about this to I was just curious did anyone know anything about this. Thats all.

(05-30-2013 11:39 AM)CK42NC Wrote:  

(05-30-2013 11:31 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(05-30-2013 11:28 AM)CK42NC Wrote:  Just read this, could Rutgers be headed back AAC?
http://atlanticcoastconfidential.com/201...placement/

No way in hell. Rutgers was added because of NYC, not because of their school or athletic department. Things will not change because of these scandals.

Edit: Upon actually reading this, it is obviously a joke. Why would you post this crap?

Why you so upset? The title of the thread is "The Scarlett Letter"
C'mon really, I'm looking for more info about this to I was just curious did anyone know anything about this. Thats all.

Even I had a laugh reading the article, its highly tongue in cheek.

(05-30-2013 11:41 AM)brista21 Wrote:  Even I had a laugh reading the article, its highly tongue in cheek.

What he said.

(05-30-2013 11:41 AM)brista21 Wrote:  

(05-30-2013 11:39 AM)CK42NC Wrote:  

(05-30-2013 11:31 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(05-30-2013 11:28 AM)CK42NC Wrote:  Just read this, could Rutgers be headed back AAC?
http://atlanticcoastconfidential.com/201...placement/

No way in hell. Rutgers was added because of NYC, not because of their school or athletic department. Things will not change because of these scandals.

Edit: Upon actually reading this, it is obviously a joke. Why would you post this crap?

Why you so upset? The title of the thread is "The Scarlett Letter"
C'mon really, I'm looking for more info about this to I was just curious did anyone know anything about this. Thats all.

Even I had a laugh reading the article, its highly tongue in cheek.

It's cool y'all are safe! it was a crazy read at first for me too!

(05-30-2013 11:43 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(05-30-2013 11:41 AM)brista21 Wrote:  Even I had a laugh reading the article, its highly tongue in cheek.

What he said.

I laughed at the University of Phoenix being among the candidates considered. Phoenix would be great for the BTN's online content...

We don't want them in the AAC. IT's bad enough we have to take them for a year. They will bring down the reputation of the entire league. Just kidding.