(12-03-2012 06:52 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 02:43 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 02:38 PM)Buccaneerlover Wrote:  CMU is bad, ECU can't play offense, Ohio U. is a trainwreck and Arkansas State is damn good.

That's a bad scouting report on our team. Now if you wanted to say we can't play a lick of pass defense you'd be dead right. It took us a while to get going on offense, but over the last 6 games we've averaged 42 ppg.

Some of your boys on the CUSA board are not happy about the NO Bowl...some actually look down on UL. Not cool. Considering the level at which our respective conferences played at this year, I would think a bit more respect might be in order.. Pass it on to the morons on the CUSA board.

Thanks,

Z

CUSA is losing one of its bowl tie ins, and I don't see them replacing it. They'd do well to keep the NO Bowl people happy.

Kent was an OT loss away from a BCS bowl, so it should be a good game. Looks like ASU is now a 3 -3 1/2 point favoriate. Must have found out Malzahn is staying.

Seems like the toughest game will be against Kent State. They had a good year, but I think stAte can handle them.

(12-03-2012 06:54 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 06:52 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 02:43 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 02:38 PM)Buccaneerlover Wrote:  CMU is bad, ECU can't play offense, Ohio U. is a trainwreck and Arkansas State is damn good.

That's a bad scouting report on our team. Now if you wanted to say we can't play a lick of pass defense you'd be dead right. It took us a while to get going on offense, but over the last 6 games we've averaged 42 ppg.

Some of your boys on the CUSA board are not happy about the NO Bowl...some actually look down on UL. Not cool. Considering the level at which our respective conferences played at this year, I would think a bit more respect might be in order.. Pass it on to the morons on the CUSA board.

Thanks,

Z

CUSA is losing one of its bowl tie ins, and I don't see them replacing it. They'd do well to keep the NO Bowl people happy.

That's not really ECU's concern going forward. My only problem with the bowl is I'm not going to be able to go.

(12-03-2012 10:09 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 06:54 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 06:52 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 02:43 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 02:38 PM)Buccaneerlover Wrote:  CMU is bad, ECU can't play offense, Ohio U. is a trainwreck and Arkansas State is damn good.

That's a bad scouting report on our team. Now if you wanted to say we can't play a lick of pass defense you'd be dead right. It took us a while to get going on offense, but over the last 6 games we've averaged 42 ppg.

Some of your boys on the CUSA board are not happy about the NO Bowl...some actually look down on UL. Not cool. Considering the level at which our respective conferences played at this year, I would think a bit more respect might be in order.. Pass it on to the morons on the CUSA board.

Thanks,

Z

CUSA is losing one of its bowl tie ins, and I don't see them replacing it. They'd do well to keep the NO Bowl people happy.

That's not really ECU's concern going forward. My only problem with the bowl is I'm not going to be able to go.

You have a neat point. ECU doesn't care about CUSA's bowl tie ins.

(12-04-2012 10:24 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 10:09 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 06:54 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 06:52 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(12-03-2012 02:43 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  That's a bad scouting report on our team. Now if you wanted to say we can't play a lick of pass defense you'd be dead right. It took us a while to get going on offense, but over the last 6 games we've averaged 42 ppg.

Some of your boys on the CUSA board are not happy about the NO Bowl...some actually look down on UL. Not cool. Considering the level at which our respective conferences played at this year, I would think a bit more respect might be in order.. Pass it on to the morons on the CUSA board.

Thanks,

Z

CUSA is losing one of its bowl tie ins, and I don't see them replacing it. They'd do well to keep the NO Bowl people happy.

That's not really ECU's concern going forward. My only problem with the bowl is I'm not going to be able to go.

You have a neat point. ECU doesn't care about CUSA's bowl tie ins.

No, but just because some ECU fans are talking poor about this bowl game doesn't mean that the bowl is going to be disappointed in having us. We'll bring a decent number of fans, more than Rice would have brought, and it will likely be an entertaining game with a lot of points scored. Message board fans talking bad about the game aren't going to affect that bowls future with C-USA.

(12-03-2012 09:21 PM)troy4ever21 Wrote:  Seems like the toughest game will be against Kent State. They had a good year, but I think stAte can handle them.

That team that took the field against MTSU should be in a BCS bowl. Hope the show up again this year.