(11-05-2012 12:48 PM)TexanMark Wrote: You ranked ordered the teams and put Lacrosse below Soccer. I called you out. You provided weak and incorrect info. Lacrosse draws bigger crowds and is on TV more despite fewer schools and a regional fan base.
I just don't see college soccer gaining much traction in the US as a big time sport.
Depends how you are ranking them. Hockey may be third in terms of dollars for the schools that play it. It is certainly more popular that baseball and woman's basketball up north. Schools like Wisconsin, North Dakota and Minnesota regularly draw over 10,000 per game. It not unusual to sell out the Kohl Center in Madison for a Badger hockey game. Outside of UConn and UT, very few women's programs draw anything close to that. Hockey games are on tv all the time, too, although not as much a woman's basketball. There simply are not that many schools playing the sport.
College Soccer, even though popular in terms of the number of schools playing it, has limited exposure on tv. Same goes for Lacrosse. Lacrosse draws better live. A big soccer crowd is a couple thousand. Lacrosse is an NE sport. Very few schools west of the Mississippi or in the deep south play it or even care about it. Consequently, in terms of national interest, soccer may be more popular.
Now, even though may northern schools don't play baseball is on tv a lot. It doesn't draw that well, but it does draw consistently and better than most of the other sports.
In short, it is almost impossible to rank the popularity of these sports, with specifying the criteria. I would guess that Wisconsin makes more money from hockey than any school makes from baseball, soccer or lacrosse. It probably is a toss up between UConn or UT's women's hoops and Badger hockey. Does this make it the 3rd most popular sport? Yes, definitely in Madison, but certainly not in Storrs.