Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Thread Closed 
History of BCS
Author Message
SF Husky Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,338
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 295
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
Post: #1
 
How come no one bashed those conferences? Here is a post from the UCONN board.


Here are the conferences sending 8-3 or worse teams to the Bowl Coalition, Bowl Alliance and BCS Bowls since the inception in 1992 without anyone calling them names,


1. Big Twelve: 6 Teams
1993 Oklahoma 8-3
1993 Texas Tech 6-5
1994 Texas Tech 6-5
1994 Texas 7-4
1996 Texas 8-4
2003 KSU 11-3

2. Big East: 4 Teams
1994 Virginia Tech 8-3
1997 Syracuse 9-3
1998 Syracuse 8-3
2004 Pittsburgh 8-3

3. Sec: 3 Teams
1993 Alabama 8-3-1
1994 Tennessee 7-4
2001 LSU 9-3

Acc: 2 Teams
1994 North Carolina 8-3
2002 Florida State 9-4

Pac-Ten 2 Teams
1994 USC 7-3-1
1999 Stanford 8-3

Big Ten: 1 Team
2000 Purdue 8-3

BCS Independents: 1 Teams
1994 Notre Dame 6-4-1

Why is the Big East being targeted when it was the only BCS Conferences to lose two of their best teams. How can the Acc be so great if 2 of the former Big East teams are the best Acc teams today? If the Big Ten loses Michigan or Iowa, Sec loses Georgia or Tennessee, or Big Twelve loses Oklahoma or Texas, Pac-Ten loses USC and California how long would one expect them to recover?

Yet, only the Big East is being judged today as other conferences were never judged yesterday. Only the Big East is expected to field 2 Top teams out of 7 schools while it is in transition. Only the Big East is judged weak when its bottom feeder Temple beats Syracuse who barely lost to FSU. Big Twelve’s Baylor beating A&M, Acc’s Duke upsetting Clemson, Sec’s Missy State thrashing Florida, Big Ten’s Indiana whipping Oregon and Minnesota and Pac-Ten’s Arizona beating Arizona State are forgotten.

The Big East is in transition and maybe a tad behind the other BCS Conferences due to the changes. Except no different than those other BCS conferences that came before them with similar records and results in previous years without the losses of good teams.

The Big East is better than any Non-BCS Conference too in Polls, Bowls and Teams with winning records. If you add Louisville and Cincinnati, which is just as fair as taking Boston College and Temple out, the Big East is and will be a good BCS Conference with 1 to 2 leaders and 1 to 2 bottom feeders just like the other BCS Conferences for years to come.

Only the dumbest sport media experts cannot understand these records, results and evaluations using something far more than farting far above their A-Holes and telling us it is their well-informed opinion.

Now you know the rest of the story!
12-04-2004 04:06 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.