Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Poll: Will Tech join the Belt
Yes
No
[Show Results]
 
Post Reply 
Will La Tech join the Belt
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 36,476
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 452
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #61
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-20-2012 04:51 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  UCA had a good offense. Their starting QB didn't play against stAte.

Yeah but unless he played defense too he wouldnt have meant a thing. We had well over 600 yards of total offense and did not punt for the entire game. If we had any semblance of a red zone offense that game and not kicked 6 field goals we would have scored 80 points.
02-20-2012 11:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MG61 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
Post: #62
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-20-2012 11:11 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(02-20-2012 04:51 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  UCA had a good offense. Their starting QB didn't play against stAte.

Yeah but unless he played defense too he wouldnt have meant a thing. We had well over 600 yards of total offense and did not punt for the entire game. If we had any semblance of a red zone offense that game and not kicked 6 field goals we would have scored 80 points.

He's just looking for an excuse because you blew out a FCS team that game them fits.
02-20-2012 11:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WinstonTheWolf Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,267
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 98
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #63
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-20-2012 11:33 PM)MG61 Wrote:  
(02-20-2012 11:11 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(02-20-2012 04:51 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  UCA had a good offense. Their starting QB didn't play against stAte.

Yeah but unless he played defense too he wouldnt have meant a thing. We had well over 600 yards of total offense and did not punt for the entire game. If we had any semblance of a red zone offense that game and not kicked 6 field goals we would have scored 80 points.

He's just looking for an excuse because you blew out a FCS team that game them fits.

That backup QB was a quality FB player from Louisiana, and he gave stAte fits in the first half, since we hadn't seen that run oriented set of plays on film.

Bottom line is stAte stroked UCA and La Tech choked on UCA.
02-20-2012 11:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #64
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
Tech also had close to 600 yards of offense against UCA (542). The difference was that UCA had 372 yards passing against Tech [only Hawaii had more (410)... more than Houston (351)] and only 225 yards passing against stAte. Tech and stAte were able to shut down UCA's running game (73 and 97, respectively).

I think they had a better offense with Nathan Dick at QB. He was able to move the chains and keep Tech's offense off the field more than the backup was able to do against stAte. Tech only had the ball for 25 minutes to UCA's 35 minutes. Time of possession in the stAte game was even at 30 to 30.
02-21-2012 06:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MG61 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
Post: #65
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 06:53 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  Tech also had close to 600 yards of offense against UCA (542). The difference was that UCA had 372 yards passing against Tech [only Hawaii had more (410)... more than Houston (351)] and only 225 yards passing against stAte. Tech and stAte were able to shut down UCA's running game (73 and 97, respectively).

I think they had a better offense with Nathan Dick at QB. He was able to move the chains and keep Tech's offense off the field more than the backup was able to do against stAte. Tech only had the ball for 25 minutes to UCA's 35 minutes. Time of possession in the stAte game was even at 30 to 30.

Ain't this great ? Now a Techster is arguing about who did better vs an FCS team. Seperation is a ***** !
02-21-2012 08:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #66
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 08:43 AM)MG61 Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 06:53 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  Tech also had close to 600 yards of offense against UCA (542). The difference was that UCA had 372 yards passing against Tech [only Hawaii had more (410)... more than Houston (351)] and only 225 yards passing against stAte. Tech and stAte were able to shut down UCA's running game (73 and 97, respectively).

I think they had a better offense with Nathan Dick at QB. He was able to move the chains and keep Tech's offense off the field more than the backup was able to do against stAte. Tech only had the ball for 25 minutes to UCA's 35 minutes. Time of possession in the stAte game was even at 30 to 30.

Ain't this great ? Now a Techster is arguing about who did better vs an FCS team. Seperation is a ***** !

You guys brought it up. I think we played much better against Houston, Ole Miss, Nevada, Miss State, Southern Miss, Fresno St, and TCU than we played against UCA.
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2012 09:00 AM by T_Won1.)
02-21-2012 08:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WinstonTheWolf Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,267
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 98
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #67
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 06:53 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  Tech also had close to 600 yards of offense against UCA (542). The difference was that UCA had 372 yards passing against Tech [only Hawaii had more (410)... more than Houston (351)] and only 225 yards passing against stAte. Tech and stAte were able to shut down UCA's running game (73 and 97, respectively).

I think they had a better offense with Nathan Dick at QB. He was able to move the chains and keep Tech's offense off the field more than the backup was able to do against stAte. Tech only had the ball for 25 minutes to UCA's 35 minutes. Time of possession in the stAte game was even at 30 to 30.

Punts: stAte 0, UCA 8 >>> La Tech 5, UCA 6

stAte blew 'em out and called off the dogs.
Tech was fortunate to come away with a win.
02-21-2012 09:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #68
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
Didn't play the same team though. QB is a key position in that offense.
02-21-2012 09:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WinstonTheWolf Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,267
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 98
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #69
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 09:17 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  Didn't play the same team though. QB is a key position in that offense.

I'm sure that contributed to the fact that stAte didn't punt.
02-21-2012 11:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MG61 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
Post: #70
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 08:59 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 08:43 AM)MG61 Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 06:53 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  Tech also had close to 600 yards of offense against UCA (542). The difference was that UCA had 372 yards passing against Tech [only Hawaii had more (410)... more than Houston (351)] and only 225 yards passing against stAte. Tech and stAte were able to shut down UCA's running game (73 and 97, respectively).

I think they had a better offense with Nathan Dick at QB. He was able to move the chains and keep Tech's offense off the field more than the backup was able to do against stAte. Tech only had the ball for 25 minutes to UCA's 35 minutes. Time of possession in the stAte game was even at 30 to 30.

Ain't this great ? Now a Techster is arguing about who did better vs an FCS team. Seperation is a ***** !

You guys brought it up. I think we played much better against Houston, Ole Miss, Nevada, Miss State, Southern Miss, Fresno St, and TCU than we played against UCA.

You guys ? I didn't bring up anything on UCA. Just commented on the message board exchange.05-nono Ain't seperation wonderful ?
02-21-2012 11:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #71
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 11:50 AM)WinstonTheWolf Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 09:17 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  Didn't play the same team though. QB is a key position in that offense.

I'm sure that contributed to the fact that stAte didn't punt.

I agree that their defense sucks.
02-21-2012 12:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
T_Won1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,987
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #72
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 11:55 AM)MG61 Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 08:59 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 08:43 AM)MG61 Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 06:53 AM)T_Won1 Wrote:  Tech also had close to 600 yards of offense against UCA (542). The difference was that UCA had 372 yards passing against Tech [only Hawaii had more (410)... more than Houston (351)] and only 225 yards passing against stAte. Tech and stAte were able to shut down UCA's running game (73 and 97, respectively).

I think they had a better offense with Nathan Dick at QB. He was able to move the chains and keep Tech's offense off the field more than the backup was able to do against stAte. Tech only had the ball for 25 minutes to UCA's 35 minutes. Time of possession in the stAte game was even at 30 to 30.

Ain't this great ? Now a Techster is arguing about who did better vs an FCS team. Seperation is a ***** !

You guys brought it up. I think we played much better against Houston, Ole Miss, Nevada, Miss State, Southern Miss, Fresno St, and TCU than we played against UCA.

You guys ? I didn't bring up anything on UCA. Just commented on the message board exchange.05-nono Ain't seperation wonderful ?

Same here.
02-21-2012 12:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TrojanCampaign Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,389
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 122
I Root For: USC, UA, AAMU,
Location: Huntsville
Post: #73
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
Do you guys remember when the only time Tech fans came to this board was to tell us how bad we are 03-lmfao

Now they are border line demanding a spot if the alliance doesn't take them. It would just be my laugh of the year if the alliance takes San Jose State and Utah State to get to 18.
02-21-2012 07:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Burn the Horse Offline
I'm Watching You
*

Posts: 8,590
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 286
I Root For: TROY
Location: Heart of Dixie
Post: #74
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 07:00 PM)TrojanCampaign Wrote:  Do you guys remember when the only time Tech fans came to this board was to tell us how bad we are 03-lmfao

Now they are border line demanding a spot if the alliance doesn't take them. It would just be my laugh of the year if the alliance takes San Jose State and Utah State to get to 18.

Yeah, and then we took Ga State, UTSA, and Texas State...and no Tech.
02-21-2012 07:15 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OsageJ Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 4,210
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 113
I Root For: stAte
Location:
Post: #75
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 07:15 PM)Burn the Horse Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 07:00 PM)TrojanCampaign Wrote:  Do you guys remember when the only time Tech fans came to this board was to tell us how bad we are 03-lmfao

Now they are border line demanding a spot if the alliance doesn't take them. It would just be my laugh of the year if the alliance takes San Jose State and Utah State to get to 18.

Yeah, and then we took Ga State, UTSA, and Texas State...and no Tech.

That would be sweet. Let 'em rot.
02-21-2012 07:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Burn the Horse Offline
I'm Watching You
*

Posts: 8,590
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 286
I Root For: TROY
Location: Heart of Dixie
Post: #76
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
I'd really prefer to get App State in the league over all other FCS programs. They would add a respected and exciting name to the roster that would garner national attention. I'd hate to miss an opportunity to get them and watch the Moutaineers go somewhere like the MAC.
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2012 07:30 PM by Burn the Horse.)
02-21-2012 07:28 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dwinging_sick Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 154
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 5
I Root For: Louisiana
Location:
Post: #77
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
I personally do not want 3 schools from 1 state in the same conference.
02-23-2012 11:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ManzanoWolf Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 2,831
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 95
I Root For: stAte
Location: Phoenix Metro
Post: #78
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-21-2012 07:19 PM)OsageJ Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 07:15 PM)Burn the Horse Wrote:  
(02-21-2012 07:00 PM)TrojanCampaign Wrote:  Do you guys remember when the only time Tech fans came to this board was to tell us how bad we are 03-lmfao

Now they are border line demanding a spot if the alliance doesn't take them. It would just be my laugh of the year if the alliance takes San Jose State and Utah State to get to 18.

Yeah, and then we took Ga State, UTSA, and Texas State...and no Tech.

That would be sweet. Let 'em rot.

Amen to that . . they were bad conference members before and they will be bad conference members again, if the SBC Presidents are stupid enough to let them back into the conference.

Go stAte . . Go SBC !! 02-13-banana
02-23-2012 11:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BkGold Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 445
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 19
I Root For: SouthernMiss
Location: Cumming, Ga.
Post: #79
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(02-18-2012 09:35 AM)Burn the Horse Wrote:  I don't understand why anyone would want to be in the Alliance. It's a ridiculous footprint and the teams are simply leftovers.

Maybe..but we want to stay one step ahead of the sun belt
03-09-2012 08:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Burn the Horse Offline
I'm Watching You
*

Posts: 8,590
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 286
I Root For: TROY
Location: Heart of Dixie
Post: #80
RE: Will La Tech join the Belt
(03-09-2012 08:54 PM)BkGold Wrote:  
(02-18-2012 09:35 AM)Burn the Horse Wrote:  I don't understand why anyone would want to be in the Alliance. It's a ridiculous footprint and the teams are simply leftovers.

Maybe..but we want to stay one step ahead of the sun belt

Well maybe one day yall will get back there. As it stands now you guys are not.
03-09-2012 09:07 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2020 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2020 MyBB Group.