Pitt comes in at 23rd while Louisville comes in at 28.

Once again Pete Fuitak shows his anti Louisville bias. He picked against us in EVERY NCAA Tournament game including our game against Lafayette and dogged us after going 11-1 last year in football.

Here is the link.

<a href='http://www.collegefootballnews.com/2005/Rankings/Preview2005_1_10.htm' target='_blank'>http://www.collegefootballnews.com/2005/Ra...ew2005_1_10.htm</a>

Louisville barely in the Top 30, LSU #2. Boston College!? And I like how he says that Louisville should be a fun team, should make another great run, shouldn't suffer that big a dropoff, then he drops then a whopping 18 spots in the polls. I don't know what color the sky is in his world but it sure as all heck isn't blue.

Give me Phil Steel's #4 over Fuitak's garbage anyday. I'd like to see us start somewhere between 8-11 but 28 is laughable.

For years, I've felt there might be some bias against the BIG EAST. This makes me think it again. For one thing, the acc had 4 teams in the top 14, three of them former BE teams. I can almost guarantee that if the same 3 teams were still in the BE that the BE would not have 3 teams in the top 14.

jim

Just win baby, the rest takes care of itself!

Aman Wilkie

JIM15068 Wrote:For years, I've felt there might be some bias against the BIG EAST. This makes me think it again. For one thing, the acc had 4 teams in the top 14, three of them former BE teams. I can almost guarantee that if the same 3 teams were still in the BE that the BE would not have 3 teams in the top 14.

jim

That is a fact!!!