Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Downgraded
Author Message
ohio1317 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 5,681
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 358
I Root For: Ohio State
Location:
Post: #41
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 09:25 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  My crystal ball says we get more QE and monetizing of debt. Definite pain in our future. My worry is the govt. has been providing the hiring slack in the jobs area until the private sector could recover. The scary part is where do we go from here?

It definitely has been trying to make up for the lack of jobs/spending in the private sector which is why you have seen trillion dollar plus deficits going on three years now. Cutting government debt now will cause an event worse than the Great Depression which is why politicians won't do it. The problem is that our economic issues themselves are debt based (like in the Great Depression) and you can't see a recovery in that environment unless you deal with the debt our radically change the world itself. In World War II, the entire industrial world outside the US was basically smashed. A truly revolutionary invention could theoretically work too, but it would have to be something like basically free energy. Absent dealing with the debt or a radical change in the world, we keep getting worse.

I was trying to work through out all of this in my head yesterday and this is basically what I see happening.

1. Our politicians play kick the can for as long as possible. They will promise trillions in cuts/increases, but it's always long term and mostly back-loaded promises that can be reversed later. The Federal Reserve will help with the delay by starting qualitative easing 3 and continuing to accept trash as collateral from the insolvent banks. This delays things (for how much longer is anyone's guess), but makes the fundamental problems worse and increases prices on necessities (food, gas, etc; non-necessities prices will go down as fewer can afford to buy them).

2. Interest rates can't be contained everywhere forever. More debt means more risk that investors aren't going to be paid which means they want higher interest. Fear in other areas, government manipulation (from the Fed in the US), and being the world's reserve currency will continue to help keep rates down here for a little while though.

The same can't be said everywhere though. Greece has needed 2 promised/perceived bailouts to get this far, but with interest beyond 30% last I checked, they won't make it without default long term. Italy, Spain, Ireland, and Portugal aren't much better. One of these countries is going to fall and it will produce a domino effect (Greece might be able to be contained, but a 2nd one never will be).

3. Once one of the semi-major nations is forced to start defaulting, it's going to set off a huge domino effect. Trust in government debt will continue to drop and banks in Europe will fail and that will then filter through to over here.

Interest rates will go into a death spiral mode very quickly at some point (once you get to that point, history shows its quick). Interest rates will rise because of fear and the increasing need for debt. This will make borrowing more expensive and the government will have to borrow more to pay for the added interest (especially when you consider how much of the debt they have is only short term stuff that is constantly being renewed). That increase in government debt will further raise interest rates which will further raise borrowing, etc. In little time you go from a relative stable interest rate to completely out of control.

4. At this point the government has two choices. The first large scale printing which would completely destroy the dollar and lead to hyperinflation. I doubt they do this because I bet the banks will hold onto enough influence to stop it.

The other alternative is large scale default. Since the government is going to have funding problems at this point, this will mean an immediate need for Congress to balance the budget (with no lending available they won't have a choice). Doing so at this point will be the worst possible way to do it and the biggest shock on the economy. Given that the economy itself will have been hurt from these events, that there is likely to be massive civil unrest, and that all of this disappearing government spending is going to filter into a number of other activities, Congress would probably have to drop more than 50% of spending which could well mean Social Security and Medicare just go poof all at once.

While #4 is happening, I think most credit in the country freezes for a time which is bad since everything relies on it (trucks to grocery stores very much included).

In short:
1. We kick the can. We monetize the debt to an extent and spend money we don't have until we are forced to stop.
2. Some European country blows. This filters to other European countries and already unstable banks and then over here.
3. Interest rates spiral out of control and funding deficit spending become impossible.
4. Congress/President chooses default over hyperinflation. Mass chaos for a time. Greatly diminished standard of living afterward.
08-05-2011 10:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ninerfan1 Offline
Habitual Line Stepper
*

Posts: 9,871
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
Post: #42
RE: Downgraded
[quote='aTxTIGER' pid='6687561' dateline='1312600494']
[quote]In addition, the plan envisions only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in other entitlements, the containment of which we and most other independent observers regard as key to long-term fiscal sustainability.[/quote]

This is the key portion to me.

I agree new revenues are needed, and that can come by reforming the tax code. But democrats have shown no willingness at all to reform entitlements in the way that's needed.

It's an unavoidable fact that entitlements cannot continue to be as generous to future recipients. That has to be dealt with and I don't believe, other than Paul Ryan's plan, anyone has put forward a plan that addresses that.
08-05-2011 10:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_In_Exile Offline
Eternal Pessimist
*

Posts: 21,809
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 461
I Root For: The Underdog
Location:
Post: #43
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 08:27 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Probably need to cut some more taxes.

And what Taxes have been Cut under Obama (e.g. in the past two years)
08-05-2011 10:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_In_Exile Offline
Eternal Pessimist
*

Posts: 21,809
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 461
I Root For: The Underdog
Location:
Post: #44
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 08:46 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The timing has never been so ripe for tax reforms. If we could get some sensible people you could really make some reasonable reforms. I'm afraid only one side realizes it.

Please.. Libs getting serious about Tax reform is one of the seals mentioned in revelation..

Eliminate the income tax and institute a national sales tax of 15%. Keep the IRS around to make sure SS is paid only and send every American a chech for 15% of 30,000 (or whatever the poverty rate is) at the beginning of each year (to make it more palatable to progressives)
08-05-2011 10:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
aTxTIGER Offline
Carrot Dude Gave Me 10% Warning
*

Posts: 35,825
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 955
I Root For: Fire Jose!!!!!
Location: Memphis, TN

Donators
Post: #45
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 10:25 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  This is the key portion to me.

I agree new revenues are needed, and that can come by reforming the tax code. But democrats have shown no willingness at all to reform entitlements in the way that's needed.

It's an unavoidable fact that entitlements cannot continue to be as generous to future recipients. That has to be dealt with and I don't believe, other than Paul Ryan's plan, anyone has put forward a plan that addresses that.

Yup. The S&P is clear that they just want the deficit situation fixed. They mention both their belief the Bush Tax Cuts will be extended in 2012 and that entitlements are out of control as their reasoning. This is a loud blaring bullhorn in the ears of Congress and President....GET THIS DONE. They dont care how we do it, just do it.
08-05-2011 10:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_In_Exile Offline
Eternal Pessimist
*

Posts: 21,809
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 461
I Root For: The Underdog
Location:
Post: #46
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 08:49 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Our tax code is crazy. It's universally despised. Lower rates close loopholes. I wonder if the mortgage exception would survive?

If you wanted people to keep buying houses it would.

The Mortgage and Child Deductions are the biggest ones you need to keep (and maybe Education spending).

The Idea behind deduction is that it was *your* money in the first place and if you pay interest on a Mortgage maybe that money should not be taxed.
08-05-2011 10:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ohio1317 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 5,681
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 358
I Root For: Ohio State
Location:
Post: #47
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 09:31 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Too many doom and gloomers. Not my style but sometimes it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Someone on here talked about someone's plan that said we cut 1% for 6 years and we are balanced. That doesn't sound like gloom and doom to me. Couple that with true tax reforms to increase revenue. Start paying down debt. *** **** it were AMERICA. Not some g damn bannna republic. We need to cut, cap, and tax. Start paying off debt. Put 50 cents on a gallon of gas. I hope this wakes some people up.

Cutting 1% of what? There is nothing that we can cut 1% of for 6 years (including the entire federal budget) that puts us remotely close to a balanced budget.

I'm not naturally doom and gloomer, but the math speaks for itself. Recovery is impossible when even a modest one would raise government debt interest payments to the point it would kill off any growth. $1.6 trillion was our deficit last year which is only .52 trillion off of what was actually paid for ($2.17 trillion from revenue + $1.65 trillion borrowed). Our debt is approaching the entire GDP of the US for one full year and 7x the federal budget and we aren't changing a thing. The entitlement programs alone take up every cent of government revenue before one penny is spent on defense, the interest on the debt (rapidly rising and one of the biggest expense items now), or anything else it does. You could destroy our entire tax base in new taxes and you would be able to cover the debt for one year at best. This cannot last for more than a couple more years (at best) and the only solution involves big cuts to programs politicians won't cut.
08-05-2011 10:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ninerfan1 Offline
Habitual Line Stepper
*

Posts: 9,871
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
Post: #48
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 10:33 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Yup. The S&P is clear that they just want the deficit situation fixed. They mention both their belief the Bush Tax Cuts will be extended in 2012 and that entitlements are out of control as their reasoning. This is a loud blaring bullhorn in the ears of Congress and President....GET THIS DONE. They dont care how we do it, just do it.

I hope you're right and that this serves as a wake up call to all of them. However I just don't know that it will.
08-05-2011 10:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ninerfan1 Offline
Habitual Line Stepper
*

Posts: 9,871
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
Post: #49
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 10:40 PM)ohio1317 Wrote:  Cutting 1% of what? There is nothing that we can cut 1% of for 6 years (including the entire federal budget) that puts us remotely close to a balanced budget.

Mach is too stupid to realize what he's talking about is Rand Paul's plan. Freeze federal spending at 2011 levels, then cut 1% off that each year for six years. The freezing at existing levels is the key. You are very much correct, simply cutting 1% while maintaining existing increase levels would never get us where we need to be.
08-05-2011 10:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
boss man Offline
The Collapse is Imminent
*

Posts: 15,491
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 889
I Root For: MEMPHIS TIGERS
Location: Arlington, TN
Post: #50
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 10:09 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  The first downgrade of the US full faith and credit happens under Obabba's watch. Happy Birthday. Tomorrow we will hear how it's not your fault.

Elections have consequences. I know I've heard that said before. Now pay the price, America. This one is gonna hurt.

S&P is obviously run by racists out to embarrass the High Priest of Hope & Change.

COTUS will probably need to take a few weeks of R&R out in Maui to consider his political options.

Some serious decisions have got to be made to protect the long term viability of the United States. The short term is going to be a gold plated b!tch regardless, so let's take our medicine.

Yes, the big three budget eaters have to be addressed - military, social security, and Medicare. For example, I honestly believe 60-75% of the foreign bases can be shut down. Probably a lot of US bases as well. Do a serious BRAC, attach the timetables, and get it done. Put those troops along our borders to cut down on the influx of illegal aliens that are helping drain the budget.

There is plenty of fat to trim out of the damn budget....starting with that atrocious ObamaCare. No one argues healthcare needs to be reformed but blow that FUGLY thing up and do it logically.
08-05-2011 10:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
aTxTIGER Offline
Carrot Dude Gave Me 10% Warning
*

Posts: 35,825
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 955
I Root For: Fire Jose!!!!!
Location: Memphis, TN

Donators
Post: #51
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 10:40 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  
(08-05-2011 10:33 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Yup. The S&P is clear that they just want the deficit situation fixed. They mention both their belief the Bush Tax Cuts will be extended in 2012 and that entitlements are out of control as their reasoning. This is a loud blaring bullhorn in the ears of Congress and President....GET THIS DONE. They dont care how we do it, just do it.

I hope you're right and that this serves as a wake up call to all of them. However I just don't know that it will.

What we need is Ronald Reagan, Tip O'Neill, and a bottle of scotch in a room for about 6 hours. This **** would get done. Unfortunately, we dont have men like that anymore in politics.
08-05-2011 10:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ohio1317 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 5,681
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 358
I Root For: Ohio State
Location:
Post: #52
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 10:43 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  
(08-05-2011 10:40 PM)ohio1317 Wrote:  Cutting 1% of what? There is nothing that we can cut 1% of for 6 years (including the entire federal budget) that puts us remotely close to a balanced budget.

Mach is too stupid to realize what he's talking about is Rand Paul's plan. Freeze federal spending at 2011 levels, then cut 1% off that each year for six years. The freezing at existing levels is the key. You are very much correct, simply cutting 1% while maintaining existing increase levels would never get us where we need to be.

That is still going to leave you well short. The 2011 budget (at least according to Wikipedia) was $3.82 trillion. The deficit was $1.65 trillion (actual number might end worse than this, but I doubt better). 1% of $3.82 trillion is $.0382 trillion ($38.2 billion). Multiply that by 6 and you are only down to $229.2 billion which is around 14% of the deficit.
08-05-2011 11:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ninerfan1 Offline
Habitual Line Stepper
*

Posts: 9,871
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
Post: #53
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 11:02 PM)ohio1317 Wrote:  That is still going to leave you well short. The 2011 budget (at least according to Wikipedia) was $3.82 trillion. The deficit was $1.65 trillion (actual number might end worse than this, but I doubt better). 1% of $3.82 trillion is $.0382 trillion ($38.2 billion). Multiply that by 6 and you are only down to $229.2 billion which is around 14% of the deficit.

I think it may have been every department cut 1% each year for 6 years, not a cumulative cut of 1%.
08-05-2011 11:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ohio1317 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 5,681
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 358
I Root For: Ohio State
Location:
Post: #54
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 11:10 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  
(08-05-2011 11:02 PM)ohio1317 Wrote:  That is still going to leave you well short. The 2011 budget (at least according to Wikipedia) was $3.82 trillion. The deficit was $1.65 trillion (actual number might end worse than this, but I doubt better). 1% of $3.82 trillion is $.0382 trillion ($38.2 billion). Multiply that by 6 and you are only down to $229.2 billion which is around 14% of the deficit.

I think it may have been every department cut 1% each year for 6 years, not a cumulative cut of 1%.

That shouldn't help either. My guess is that it's probably assuming more revenue from an improving economy (almost all government assumptions do). I want to like Paul (and respect him more than most in Capital Hill), but it's still not going to be enough.
08-05-2011 11:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
aTxTIGER Offline
Carrot Dude Gave Me 10% Warning
*

Posts: 35,825
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 955
I Root For: Fire Jose!!!!!
Location: Memphis, TN

Donators
Post: #55
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 11:25 PM)ohio1317 Wrote:  
(08-05-2011 11:10 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  
(08-05-2011 11:02 PM)ohio1317 Wrote:  That is still going to leave you well short. The 2011 budget (at least according to Wikipedia) was $3.82 trillion. The deficit was $1.65 trillion (actual number might end worse than this, but I doubt better). 1% of $3.82 trillion is $.0382 trillion ($38.2 billion). Multiply that by 6 and you are only down to $229.2 billion which is around 14% of the deficit.

I think it may have been every department cut 1% each year for 6 years, not a cumulative cut of 1%.

That shouldn't help either. My guess is that it's probably assuming more revenue from an improving economy (almost all government assumptions do). I want to like Paul (and respect him more than most in Capital Hill), but it's still not going to be enough.

An economy with lowered unemployment and rising wages would help quite a bit. I am still in favor of a scenario where we cut 1 trillion out of the budget over each of the next 2 years and replacing 50-75% of those savings on infrastructure projects and the remaining amount on tax cuts. After those years the money that was spent on infrastructure for the previous 2 years is straight savings.

It's a win-win

We are forced to deal with entitlements spending in a meaningful way.
We put people to work NOW.
We cut taxes to increase available capital in the private sector.
We start down the road to update and replace our outdated infrastructure.
You have meaningful deficit reduction in 2 years when the economy should...I repeat...should be in a better place.
08-05-2011 11:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,632
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1042
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #56
RE: Downgraded
(08-05-2011 10:48 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  
(08-05-2011 10:33 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  The S&P is clear that they just want the deficit situation fixed. They mention both their belief the Bush Tax Cuts will be extended in 2012 and that entitlements are out of control as their reasoning. This is a loud blaring bullhorn in the ears of Congress and President....GET THIS DONE. They dont care how we do it, just do it.
What we need is Ronald Reagan, Tip O'Neill, and a bottle of scotch in a room for about 6 hours. This **** would get done. Unfortunately, we dont have men like that anymore in politics.
The deficit situation certainly didn't get fixed when Reagan and Tip O'Neill were in charge.
08-06-2011 12:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
aTxTIGER Offline
Carrot Dude Gave Me 10% Warning
*

Posts: 35,825
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 955
I Root For: Fire Jose!!!!!
Location: Memphis, TN

Donators
Post: #57
RE: Downgraded
(08-06-2011 12:26 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(08-05-2011 10:48 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  
(08-05-2011 10:33 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  The S&P is clear that they just want the deficit situation fixed. They mention both their belief the Bush Tax Cuts will be extended in 2012 and that entitlements are out of control as their reasoning. This is a loud blaring bullhorn in the ears of Congress and President....GET THIS DONE. They dont care how we do it, just do it.
What we need is Ronald Reagan, Tip O'Neill, and a bottle of scotch in a room for about 6 hours. This **** would get done. Unfortunately, we dont have men like that anymore in politics.
The deficit situation certainly didn't get fixed when Reagan and Tip O'Neill were in charge.

No it didnt, but a lot of other things certainly did.
08-06-2011 12:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,632
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1042
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #58
RE: Downgraded
(08-06-2011 12:37 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  
(08-06-2011 12:26 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  The deficit situation certainly didn't get fixed when Reagan and Tip O'Neill were in charge.
No it didnt, but a lot of other things certainly did.
Hmmmmm.......
08-06-2011 12:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
aTxTIGER Offline
Carrot Dude Gave Me 10% Warning
*

Posts: 35,825
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 955
I Root For: Fire Jose!!!!!
Location: Memphis, TN

Donators
Post: #59
RE: Downgraded
(08-06-2011 12:47 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(08-06-2011 12:37 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  
(08-06-2011 12:26 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  The deficit situation certainly didn't get fixed when Reagan and Tip O'Neill were in charge.
No it didnt, but a lot of other things certainly did.
Hmmmmm.......

hahahaha. On a side note, did you just have a posting issue? I kept seeing a new post by you but nothing was there. I ask because I had an issue on this same thread just thirty minutes ago.
08-06-2011 12:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,632
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1042
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #60
RE: Downgraded
Yes. I posted but nothing showed up on screen.
08-06-2011 12:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.