(08-01-2011 02:13 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  From your posting history, I highly doubt that...

That's because you clearly have a vein of idiocy running through you that prevents you from envisioning possibilities.

(08-01-2011 01:35 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 01:23 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  Your smrt

8 posts and 2 of them were criticizing spelling.

you read all my posts..thats sweet. That was on purpose...idiot.

(08-01-2011 01:30 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 01:27 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  Actually not so much...what does your post have to do with this Presidents policy. Nothing. Thats why its irrelevant. Attacking people who attacked the President 2.5 years ago is irrelevant. Thanks for showing us how you hold on to your issues.

? Was I attacking the people who were going after Bush? Seriously?

You many not have been around long enough to know what I think kiddo..

True, but you're not very good at articulating what you think. We probably think very much alike. I despise libs...how close are we?

You seem to despise everyone. Whatever rocks your boat, moron.

(08-01-2011 03:03 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You seem to despise everyone. Whatever rocks your boat, moron.

I only despise those who have no understanding of what they complain about. There are a few people on this board who actually seem to be informed. You know who you are...or aren't (Paul).

(08-01-2011 02:24 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 02:13 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  From your posting history, I highly doubt that...

That's because you clearly have a vein of idiocy running through you that prevents you from envisioning possibilities.

Sorry pal, but it is the Establishment, not the "racist" people, that are falling down on the job.

(08-01-2011 03:07 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 02:24 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 02:13 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  From your posting history, I highly doubt that...

That's because you clearly have a vein of idiocy running through you that prevents you from envisioning possibilities.

Sorry pal, but it is the Establishment, not the "racist" people, that are falling down on the job.

Agreed. The political establishments of both parties are destroying this great country. Thank goodness for the freshman in the house who are at least trying to bring sanity to DC through fiscal responsibility and tax reform. Maybe they will succeed after 2012. Time will tell.

(08-01-2011 03:06 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 03:03 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You seem to despise everyone. Whatever rocks your boat, moron.

I only despise those who have no understanding of what they complain about. There are a few people on this board who actually seem to be informed. You know who you are...or aren't (Paul).

Take a brake and just read a while, sunshine.

(08-01-2011 03:14 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 03:06 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 03:03 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You seem to despise everyone. Whatever rocks your boat, moron.

I only despise those who have no understanding of what they complain about. There are a few people on this board who actually seem to be informed. You know who you are...or aren't (Paul).

Take a brake and just read a while, sunshine.

I'm not going to scour the threads for an intelligent comment from you. I've read the posts on this thread and the ones from you are ridiculous. Sunshine. You've added nothing.

2012 should be a referendum on a mismanaged government.

25% of your posts were nothing more than pointing at spelling errors. You may add some intelligence eventually but it will take more than being the grammar police.

(08-01-2011 03:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  2012 should be a referendum on a mismanaged government.

True, but I knew that topic would at least get the discussion started. Regardless of what side of the isle you fall on, most people on this thread at least can agree that the government is corrupt and thats whats led us to the debate today. Socialism doesn't work and trying to tax your way to prosperity is like standing in a bucket and trying to lift yourself up by pulling the handle. Let the free market work and allow economic natural selection choose who wins.

(08-01-2011 03:27 PM)Paul M Wrote:  25% of your posts were nothing more than pointing at spelling errors. You may add some intelligence eventually but it will take more than being the grammar police.

Point taken. It irritates me when people make a bad point and can't spell. Or use the wrong word entirely. Spell check isn't hard to use so people shouldn't showcase their ignorance by being incorrect and illiterate.

(08-01-2011 03:34 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 03:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  2012 should be a referendum on a mismanaged government.

True, but I knew that topic would at least get the discussion started. Regardless of what side of the isle you fall on, most people on this thread at least can agree that the government is corrupt and thats whats led us to the debate today. Socialism doesn't work and trying to tax your way to prosperity is like standing in a bucket and trying to lift yourself up by pulling the handle. Let the free market work and allow economic natural selection choose who wins.

Maybe you can detale all of the Socialist policies that Obama has enabled and all the taxes he has increased for us. Then we can debait those.

(08-01-2011 03:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 03:34 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 03:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  2012 should be a referendum on a mismanaged government.

True, but I knew that topic would at least get the discussion started. Regardless of what side of the isle you fall on, most people on this thread at least can agree that the government is corrupt and thats whats led us to the debate today. Socialism doesn't work and trying to tax your way to prosperity is like standing in a bucket and trying to lift yourself up by pulling the handle. Let the free market work and allow economic natural selection choose who wins.

Maybe you can detale all of the Socialist policies that Obama has enabled and all the taxes he has increased for us. Then we can debait those.

Verrily klevar.

English be some folks best subjeks

(08-01-2011 03:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 03:34 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 03:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  2012 should be a referendum on a mismanaged government.

True, but I knew that topic would at least get the discussion started. Regardless of what side of the isle you fall on, most people on this thread at least can agree that the government is corrupt and thats whats led us to the debate today. Socialism doesn't work and trying to tax your way to prosperity is like standing in a bucket and trying to lift yourself up by pulling the handle. Let the free market work and allow economic natural selection choose who wins.

Maybe you can detale all of the Socialist policies that Obama has enabled and all the taxes he has increased for us. Then we can debait those.

Right now its more about the debt (unfunded), Obamacare, Cap and Trade through the EPA and the scheduled tax hikes that were part of Obamacare. Lets start there. Oh, and that wasn't directed at Obama but I think we can all go there if you want. Is that DETALED enough for you to start the DEBAIT?

ImMoreAwesomeThanYou I'm betting you are a poser, a liberal wolf in conservative sheep clothes.

(08-01-2011 01:27 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  Actually not so much...what does your post have to do with this Presidents policy. Nothing. Thats why its irrelevant. Attacking people who attacked the President 2.5 years ago is irrelevant. Thanks for showing us how you hold on to your issues.

If you want people to respond directly to your post, make it worth responding to. Do you honestly think it was? You should thank Niner for giving you the respect he did... and Grad for falling on his sword for you.

(08-01-2011 01:29 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 01:06 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(08-01-2011 01:02 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  They guy had barely taken office when mobs of middle-aged and elderly white people were taking to the street with cries of "We want OUR country back." The irrational hatred of the President is rooted in the racism of the right. You can all deny it, but it's obvious.

Yea those angry tea party types never went after Bush..



And why did they Hate Clinton?

There was no TKlan during Bush's years, and funny that you show "TKlan types" going after Bush over an issue that centers around Hispanics. Thanks for bolstering my point.

So Ron Paul, who most of you bashers claim is the father of the tea party, from a district FILLED with non-anglos, wasn't around during Bush and hasn't been screaming about the huge government??

Riiiiight.

and FTR, the issue doesn't center around Hispanics... but around OUR borders. This country is FILLED with LEGAL (and illegal) Hispanics who use the dollar, not the Peso. Only a racist would see a picture of a US President on foreign currency as a knock against people not pictured there who don't use that currency. If it were Bush on a Pound, would that imply the party was anti-Anglo? Or that Bush's policies may as well make him PM rather than President??

I know what you THINK your answer is... but that is exactly what makes you wrong. Most Hispanics in this country, legal or illegal, don't care much about the peso... except perhaps that their dollar purchase more of them.

(08-01-2011 01:02 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  They guy had barely taken office when mobs of middle-aged and elderly white people were taking to the street with cries of "We want OUR country back." The irrational hatred of the President is rooted in the racism of the right. You can all deny it, but it's obvious.

Were these the same white people who voted him into office? Blacks only make up 12% of the population (although 95% of blacks voted for Obama) so they would need the help of the racist white man to get him elected. Why is it racist when people have buyer's remorse? We felt the same way about Carter.