It is in the first line of the article that you apparently didn't read.

Quote:A new report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) finds that President Obama’s economic stimulus program helped nearly double U.S. debt.

You think you are "schooling right wing morons" but you are only making yourself look idiotic.

You are correct Paul, he didn't read it.

(06-26-2011 12:57 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  It is in the first line of the article that you apparently didn't read.

Quote:A new report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) finds that President Obama’s economic stimulus program helped nearly double U.S. debt.

You think you are "schooling right wing morons" but you are only making yourself look idiotic.

I read it. Just go look up the numbers and tell me the US federal debt prior to the stimulus and today. According to you, it should have nearly doubled. So go see.

(06-26-2011 01:01 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 12:57 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  It is in the first line of the article that you apparently didn't read.

Quote:A new report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) finds that President Obama’s economic stimulus program helped nearly double U.S. debt.

You think you are "schooling right wing morons" but you are only making yourself look idiotic.

I read it. Just go look up the numbers and tell me the US federal debt prior to the stimulus and today. According to you, it should have nearly doubled. So go see.

According to me? You found me out! My name is Conn Carroll and I am a Senior Editorial Writer at the Washington Examiner.

It's clear umgad is out of his league here. And out of his head.

(06-26-2011 01:39 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 01:01 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 12:57 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  It is in the first line of the article that you apparently didn't read.

Quote:A new report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) finds that President Obama’s economic stimulus program helped nearly double U.S. debt.

You think you are "schooling right wing morons" but you are only making yourself look idiotic.

I read it. Just go look up the numbers and tell me the US federal debt prior to the stimulus and today. According to you, it should have nearly doubled. So go see.

According to me? You found me out! My name is Conn Carroll and I am a Senior Editorial Writer at the Washington Examiner.

So you don't believe the article is correct? You won't back it or act as though it is true? I guess you aren't a complete idiot. SumOfAllStupidity doesn't have an out since he posted it.

(06-26-2011 03:09 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  So you don't believe the article is correct? You won't back it or act as though it is true? I guess you aren't a complete idiot. SumOfAllStupidity doesn't have an out since he posted it.

Ugh. Go read the article. It is an editorial that reviews the CBO's findings in a recent report. Here's the part of the article that is addressed in the headline.

Quote:According to CBO projections, before Obama’s stimulus became law, federal debt equaled 36 percent of GDP and was projected to decline slightly over the next few years. Instead, thanks in large part to the stimulus, debt reached 62 percent of GDP by 2010.

36% to 62% isn't "doubling" but IMO it is "almost doubling" like the headline says. However the article goes on to say: "Debt will reach 70 percent of GDP by the end of this year". 70% is even closer to "almost doubling" the % of GDP.

Please seek out a reading comprehension course at your local community center. It will make things VASTLY easier on us here in the Spin Room if you learn how to understand what you're reading.

(06-26-2011 04:07 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 03:09 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  So you don't believe the article is correct? You won't back it or act as though it is true? I guess you aren't a complete idiot. SumOfAllStupidity doesn't have an out since he posted it.

Ugh. Go read the article. It is an editorial that reviews the CBO's findings in a recent report. Here's the part of the article that is addressed in the headline.

Quote:According to CBO projections, before Obama’s stimulus became law, federal debt equaled 36 percent of GDP and was projected to decline slightly over the next few years. Instead, thanks in large part to the stimulus, debt reached 62 percent of GDP by 2010.

36% to 62% isn't "doubling" but IMO it is "almost doubling" like the headline says. However the article goes on to say: "Debt will reach 70 percent of GDP by the end of this year". 70% is even closer to "almost doubling" the % of GDP.

Please seek out a reading comprehension course at your local community center. It will make things VASTLY easier on us here in the Spin Room if you learn how to understand what you're reading.

You know you are speaking to a box of rocks.

(06-26-2011 04:07 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 03:09 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  So you don't believe the article is correct? You won't back it or act as though it is true? I guess you aren't a complete idiot. SumOfAllStupidity doesn't have an out since he posted it.

Ugh. Go read the article. It is an editorial that reviews the CBO's findings in a recent report. Here's the part of the article that is addressed in the headline.

Quote:According to CBO projections, before Obama’s stimulus became law, federal debt equaled 36 percent of GDP and was projected to decline slightly over the next few years. Instead, thanks in large part to the stimulus, debt reached 62 percent of GDP by 2010.

36% to 62% isn't "doubling" but IMO it is "almost doubling" like the headline says. However the article goes on to say: "Debt will reach 70 percent of GDP by the end of this year". 70% is even closer to "almost doubling" the % of GDP.

Please seek out a reading comprehension course at your local community center. It will make things VASTLY easier on us here in the Spin Room if you learn how to understand what you're reading.

I've read the article. It's clearly wrong. And it's hilarious that you rubes can't see why even after I have twice pointed to the solution for you.

(06-26-2011 06:06 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 04:07 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 03:09 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  So you don't believe the article is correct? You won't back it or act as though it is true? I guess you aren't a complete idiot. SumOfAllStupidity doesn't have an out since he posted it.

Ugh. Go read the article. It is an editorial that reviews the CBO's findings in a recent report. Here's the part of the article that is addressed in the headline.

Quote:According to CBO projections, before Obama’s stimulus became law, federal debt equaled 36 percent of GDP and was projected to decline slightly over the next few years. Instead, thanks in large part to the stimulus, debt reached 62 percent of GDP by 2010.

36% to 62% isn't "doubling" but IMO it is "almost doubling" like the headline says. However the article goes on to say: "Debt will reach 70 percent of GDP by the end of this year". 70% is even closer to "almost doubling" the % of GDP.

Please seek out a reading comprehension course at your local community center. It will make things VASTLY easier on us here in the Spin Room if you learn how to understand what you're reading.

I've read the article. It's clearly wrong. And it's hilarious that you rubes can't see why even after I have twice pointed to the solution for you.

As has been pointed out to you multiple times, the title and article was written by ...... come on...... waiting...... anyone...... anyone...... Conn Carroll Senior Editorial Writer

I cannot understand how after all this time people have pointed this out and you just ignore. Carroll is entitled to his/her opinion.

(06-26-2011 06:30 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 06:06 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 04:07 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 03:09 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  So you don't believe the article is correct? You won't back it or act as though it is true? I guess you aren't a complete idiot. SumOfAllStupidity doesn't have an out since he posted it.

Ugh. Go read the article. It is an editorial that reviews the CBO's findings in a recent report. Here's the part of the article that is addressed in the headline.

Quote:According to CBO projections, before Obama’s stimulus became law, federal debt equaled 36 percent of GDP and was projected to decline slightly over the next few years. Instead, thanks in large part to the stimulus, debt reached 62 percent of GDP by 2010.

36% to 62% isn't "doubling" but IMO it is "almost doubling" like the headline says. However the article goes on to say: "Debt will reach 70 percent of GDP by the end of this year". 70% is even closer to "almost doubling" the % of GDP.

Please seek out a reading comprehension course at your local community center. It will make things VASTLY easier on us here in the Spin Room if you learn how to understand what you're reading.

I've read the article. It's clearly wrong. And it's hilarious that you rubes can't see why even after I have twice pointed to the solution for you.

As has been pointed out to you multiple times, the title and article was written by ...... come on...... waiting...... anyone...... anyone...... Conn Carroll Senior Editorial Writer

I cannot understand how after all this time people have pointed this out and you just ignore. Carroll is entitled to his/her opinion.

Whether or not the debt has doubled is not a matter of opinion, SumOfAllStupidity. Just trot on over to google and look up federal debt figures and see if the headline and article are accurate. It's easy to do (if you're not a complete idiot).

(06-26-2011 11:30 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 07:00 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(06-25-2011 08:05 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(06-25-2011 07:16 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(06-24-2011 06:46 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Simpletom, the fool. I'm the free thinker, you are the dirtbag liar. Now, admit you were dead wrong.

Of the last 18 threads I posted.

3 foxnews
2 AP
2 newsmax
2 chron
1 wnd
1 wsj
1 wordpress
1 wash examiner
1 daily market
1 youtube
1 blaze
1 examiner
1 space

It's worse than we thought. If not for the Houston Chronicle you would still be batting 0.000

PeaWee you are just a dullard.

It must be sad being forced to 5th tier media sources like the Blaze, WND, Newsmax etc. to prop up your belief system.

As usual, the point went right over your PeaWeeWeeWee head. Swoooosh, it's gone.

No. I think we understood what you were trying to prove. It just failed to achieve the results you were hoping for.

(06-26-2011 01:39 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 01:01 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 12:57 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  It is in the first line of the article that you apparently didn't read.

Quote:A new report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) finds that President Obama’s economic stimulus program helped nearly double U.S. debt.

You think you are "schooling right wing morons" but you are only making yourself look idiotic.

I read it. Just go look up the numbers and tell me the US federal debt prior to the stimulus and today. According to you, it should have nearly doubled. So go see.

According to me? You found me out! My name is Conn Carroll and I am a Senior Editorial Writer at the Washington Examiner.

He said "you" because you are agreeing with the headline. Moron. Now go look at the friggin' numbers! Did the debt double? Geesh. It isn't that hard people.

(06-26-2011 04:07 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 03:09 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  So you don't believe the article is correct? You won't back it or act as though it is true? I guess you aren't a complete idiot. SumOfAllStupidity doesn't have an out since he posted it.

Ugh. Go read the article. It is an editorial that reviews the CBO's findings in a recent report. Here's the part of the article that is addressed in the headline.

Quote:According to CBO projections, before Obama’s stimulus became law, federal debt equaled 36 percent of GDP and was projected to decline slightly over the next few years. Instead, thanks in large part to the stimulus, debt reached 62 percent of GDP by 2010.

36% to 62% isn't "doubling" but IMO it is "almost doubling" like the headline says. However the article goes on to say: "Debt will reach 70 percent of GDP by the end of this year". 70% is even closer to "almost doubling" the % of GDP.

Please seek out a reading comprehension course at your local community center. It will make things VASTLY easier on us here in the Spin Room if you learn how to understand what you're reading.

Let me try and help you out here since your one brain cell just died. Ok, the headline says the debt doubled. No. THe debt did not double. THe debt to GDP ratio may have almost doubled but the debt certainly did not. THere is a BIG difference(neither is good but a difference nonetheless). The title is spin to get the reaction it recieved from you morons.

(06-26-2011 07:03 PM)RobertN Wrote:  THe debt to GDP ratio may have almost doubled

Robert finally read a post. applause

Although he doesn't understand what he read.

(06-26-2011 07:11 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 07:03 PM)RobertN Wrote:  THe debt to GDP ratio may have almost doubled

Robert finally read a post. applause

Although he doesn't understand what he read.

So you are telling me debt and debt to GDP ratio are the same thing? Who knew(well besides you apparently)?

Read what I post. Stop at the periods.

(06-26-2011 08:00 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Read what I post. Stop at the periods.

I read what you posted. I am Just trying to figure out what your point is that is all.

(06-26-2011 08:33 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-26-2011 08:00 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Read what I post. Stop at the periods.

I read what you posted. I am Just trying to figure out what your point is that is all.

Don't overload your one brain cell. We still need ditch diggers.