how is the belt recruiting looking compared to WAC recruiting?

Pretty good.

But to be fair... Most Belt schools have a 1-3 hour head start in landing commits, because of the time zone thing.

(06-22-2011 05:17 PM)thetastygreek Wrote:  Pretty good.

But to be fair... Most Belt schools have a 1-3 hour head start in landing commits, because of the time zone thing.

(06-22-2011 05:07 PM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  how is the belt recruiting looking compared to WAC recruiting?

Which WAC you talking about. The one with Boise st or the soon to be dead WAC.

Sigh, I'll entertain it:

WAC Commits: 15, primarily three stars
WAC Commits sans Hawaii, Boise, Nevada, and Fresno: 3 (2 to NMSU, 1 to LA Tech)

Sun Belt Commits: 8 (3 to ASU; 1 to FIU, FAU, UNT, Troy, and WKU; 0 to ULL, ULM, and MTSU)

(06-22-2011 11:03 PM)westcoastwolf Wrote:  Sigh, I'll entertain it:

WAC Commits: 15, primarily three stars
WAC Commits sans Hawaii, Boise, Nevada, and Fresno: 3 (2 to NMSU, 1 to LA Tech)

Sun Belt Commits: 8 (3 to ASU; 1 to FIU, FAU, UNT, Troy, and WKU; 0 to ULL, ULM, and MTSU)

I think UNT has 2

(06-22-2011 11:03 PM)westcoastwolf Wrote:  Sigh, I'll entertain it:

WAC Commits: 15, primarily three stars
WAC Commits sans Hawaii, Boise, Nevada, and Fresno: 3 (2 to NMSU, 1 to LA Tech)

Sun Belt Commits: 8 (3 to ASU; 1 to FIU, FAU, UNT, Troy, and WKU; 0 to ULL, ULM, and MTSU)

No need to list anything but the WAC members numbers, thanks.

ASU actually has four as well.