Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
Author Message
TJfan Offline
Banned

Posts: 146
Joined: Feb 2011
I Root For: Constitution
Location:
Post: #1
Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
Quote:God is not capricious. He's given us a creation that is dynamically stable. We are not going to run out of anything.

-Mike Beard, R-Mn State Senator


And yet people still listen to these deluded morons on environmental issues.
02-19-2011 02:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


georgia_tech_swagger Offline
Res publica non dominetur
*

Posts: 51,393
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 2017
I Root For: GT, USCU, FU, WYO
Location: Upstate, SC

SkunkworksFolding@NCAAbbsNCAAbbs LUGCrappies
Post: #2
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
You're free to give thousands of your dollars a year to General Election to put in a giant pile and set on fire use to develop "green energy", just to steal money from me to do it.
02-19-2011 02:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,583
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #3
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-19-2011 02:29 PM)TJfan Wrote:  
Quote:God is not capricious. He's given us a creation that is dynamically stable. We are not going to run out of anything.

-Mike Beard, R-Mn State Senator


And yet people still listen to these deluded morons on environmental issues.

Well it seems that you listen to them, not sure if that equates to you being a moron?
(This post was last modified: 02-19-2011 04:52 PM by SuperFlyBCat.)
02-19-2011 04:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,878
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #4
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-19-2011 02:29 PM)TJfan Wrote:  
Quote:God is not capricious. He's given us a creation that is dynamically stable. We are not going to run out of anything.

-Mike Beard, R-Mn State Senator


And yet people still listen to these deluded morons on environmental issues.

Even though the planet has been warming since the last ice age 10,000 years ago the libs tell me global warming is my fault and that taxing me will fix it - that's delusional.
02-19-2011 08:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TJfan Offline
Banned

Posts: 146
Joined: Feb 2011
I Root For: Constitution
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
So it is impossible for living things to impact God's creation? Cyanobacteria might disagree with you.
02-19-2011 09:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Claw Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,898
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1225
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
Post: #6
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
Anyone want to tell me about a doomsday prediction that came true?

Just one will do.

I'll wait.
02-19-2011 09:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,878
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #7
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-19-2011 09:35 PM)Claw Wrote:  Anyone want to tell me about a doomsday prediction that came true?

Just one will do.

I'll wait.

Ummm, Lindsay Lohan?
02-19-2011 11:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mr. Peanut Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,233
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: American Worker
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
Liberals and their fancy book learnin'
02-20-2011 06:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jugnaut Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,874
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 482
I Root For: UCF
Location: Florida
Post: #9
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-19-2011 08:42 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  
(02-19-2011 02:29 PM)TJfan Wrote:  
Quote:God is not capricious. He's given us a creation that is dynamically stable. We are not going to run out of anything.

-Mike Beard, R-Mn State Senator


And yet people still listen to these deluded morons on environmental issues.

Even though the planet has been warming since the last ice age 10,000 years ago the libs tell me global warming is my fault and that taxing me will fix it - that's delusional.

And liberals never address the second question: Is warming a bad thing? Answer: no. Warming is much better for our ability to survive on the planet than cooling. Warming creates higher crop yields, wild plants to thrive which in turn creates more biodiversity of plant life. Cooling on the other hand kills everything.
(This post was last modified: 02-20-2011 09:16 AM by Jugnaut.)
02-20-2011 09:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #10
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-20-2011 09:12 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  And liberals never address the second question: Is warming a bad thing? Answer: no. Warming is much better for our ability to survive on the planet than cooling. Warming creates higher crop yields (yea), wild plants to thrive which in turn creates more biodiversity of plant life. Cooling on the other hand kills everything.
02-20-2011 09:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TJfan Offline
Banned

Posts: 146
Joined: Feb 2011
I Root For: Constitution
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
This isn't a global warming thread. It's a conservation of matter and energy thread. Repug fundies are so bad at science they don't even believe in this concept.
02-20-2011 09:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #12
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-20-2011 09:55 AM)TJfan Wrote:  This isn't a global warming thread. It's a conservation of matter and energy thread.


If you wish to narrowly define a topic for discussion, a suggestion might be to not open it up broadly.



(02-19-2011 02:29 PM)TJfan Wrote:  And yet people still listen to these deluded morons on environmental issues.

(02-19-2011 09:26 PM)TJfan Wrote:  So it is impossible for living things to impact God's creation?
02-20-2011 10:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #13
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-20-2011 06:03 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  Liberals and their fancy book learnin'

Exactly. Might be nice if they actually stepped foot in reality once in a while.
02-20-2011 01:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Mr. Peanut Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,233
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: American Worker
Location:
Post: #14
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
conservatives inability to to change tought patterns as circumstances around them change will not serve them well because as we all know natural selection (much like reality) has a liberal bias 02-13-banana
(This post was last modified: 02-20-2011 03:38 PM by Mr. Peanut.)
02-20-2011 03:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,279
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1284
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #15
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-19-2011 02:29 PM)TJfan Wrote:  
Quote:God is not capricious. He's given us a creation that is dynamically stable. We are not going to run out of anything.

-Mike Beard, R-Mn State Senator


And yet people still listen to these deluded morons on environmental issues.

First, you're attributing the opinions of a single state Senator to ALL Republicans? Wow... John Lennon once claimed to be the Walrus. Crazy lot those liberals.

Second, I'd be interested (but as this is some low level state rep from Mn, not THAT interested) in the context here. I don't think there are many people who believe what you say this guy believes, even if he DOES believe it. The phrase "dynamically stable" implies to me that as certain things become more scarce, other things become more attractive as alternatives... overall, we have what we need. I don't see that being inconsistent with the idea of "alternative" energy policies.

There is a school of thought that says conserving oil DISCOURAGES alternatives. Maybe this guy is one of those. I mean, if burning fossil fuels kills the environment, then cars from non-fossil sources (or energy that doesn't involve fossil fuels to make it, like elect) are the best choice, right? Making a car that gets 50MPG will make our oil last longer, but it doesn't stop us from buring it
(This post was last modified: 02-20-2011 05:12 PM by Hambone10.)
02-20-2011 05:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BlazerFan11 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,228
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 367
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-20-2011 03:37 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  conservatives inability to to change tought patterns as circumstances around them change will not serve them well because as we all know natural selection (much like reality) has a liberal bias 02-13-banana

No, most liberal policies fight against natural selection.
02-20-2011 07:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,279
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1284
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #17
RE: Conservation not necessary according to conservatives
(02-20-2011 07:39 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  
(02-20-2011 03:37 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  conservatives inability to to change tought patterns as circumstances around them change will not serve them well because as we all know natural selection (much like reality) has a liberal bias 02-13-banana

No, most liberal policies fight against natural selection.

Most? Virtually ALL liberal policies are designed to protect those in the weaker position... USUALLY at the expense of the stronger. I'm not saying there aren't many situations where this is the correct thing to do... merely that this is an AMUSINGLY wrong statement
02-20-2011 07:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.