(02-14-2011 07:22 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:00 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-13-2011 10:14 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Because it's relevant. When someone criticizes a capitalist it's natural to point out the obvious, what has been wrought by socialists.

Is this dramatic pause, I am awaiting your list.

Seriously? I give you a short list of socialist philosophical writers and you ask what they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.. Amazing.

Has your research turned up anything yet? Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, anything they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.?

(02-15-2011 07:23 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 07:22 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:00 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-13-2011 10:14 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Because it's relevant. When someone criticizes a capitalist it's natural to point out the obvious, what has been wrought by socialists.

Is this dramatic pause, I am awaiting your list.

Seriously? I give you a short list of socialist philosophical writers and you ask what they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.. Amazing.

Has your research turned up anything yet? Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, anything they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.?

Hitler is a liberal? Do you even know what socialism is? It is an economic philosophy. You seem to know nothing about liberalism, socialism or Ayn Rand's writings. I'll bet you know what time Rush comes on to tell you what to think.

(02-15-2011 05:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  9 of our 10 hottest years in recorded history have been in the last decade with the outlier being 1998 (which is tied with 2010 as the hottest on record) You have scored zero but thanks for playing. I like you, your silly

No, they haven't. Unless you believe faked data. And, from the references you cite and how you cite them, I believe you do. If you really want to get into the science questions, I'm your huckleberry.

But for the record, you lose.

(02-15-2011 08:19 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 05:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  9 of our 10 hottest years in recorded history have been in the last decade with the outlier being 1998 (which is tied with 2010 as the hottest on record) You have scored zero but thanks for playing. I like you, your silly

No, they haven't. Unless you believe faked data. And, from the references you cite and how you cite them, I believe you do. If you really want to get into the science questions, I'm your huckleberry.

But for the record, you lose.

This is per the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for us non scientist) Oh and by the way Dr. Torch that is game, set and match assuming you are a reality based life form.

(02-14-2011 02:10 PM)uhmump95 Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 07:20 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  Pace your hate because Obama will be in office until Hillary takes over in 2016

I've had to since Obama has continued every single bad policy Dubya had. I find it amusing liberals who spent every day bashing Dubya now love Obama ... for having nearly IDENTICAL philosophies.

Actually I find the exact opposite amusing, how conservatives bash Obama, but give Bush a pass for having nearly identical philosophies.

Who? You must have a short memory. I was against TARP and the bailouts.

(02-14-2011 06:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  If not for my Christian belief system I would also be a conservative. I just choose to love others as myself. I even love GTS.

Conservatives are, by FAR, more charitable than liberals. Liberals think stealing someone else's money, giving it to another, while they reap the benefits of votes, etc., is charity. Got news for you, it isn't. Break out your own f'n wallet.

(02-15-2011 08:37 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  If not for my Christian belief system I would also be a conservative. I just choose to love others as myself. I even love GTS.

Conservatives are, by FAR, more charitable than liberals. Liberals think stealing someone else's money, giving it to another, while they reap the benefits of votes, etc., is charity. Got news for you, it isn't. Break out your own f'n wallet.

...and more humble too

(02-15-2011 07:39 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 07:23 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 07:22 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:00 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-13-2011 10:14 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Because it's relevant. When someone criticizes a capitalist it's natural to point out the obvious, what has been wrought by socialists.

Is this dramatic pause, I am awaiting your list.

Seriously? I give you a short list of socialist philosophical writers and you ask what they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.. Amazing.

Has your research turned up anything yet? Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, anything they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.?

Hitler is a liberal? Do you even know what socialism is? It is an economic philosophy. You seem to know nothing about liberalism, socialism or Ayn Rand's writings. I'll bet you know what time Rush comes on to tell you what to think.

Silly liberal, you honestly think political ideology can be used the same way in every country, don't you? Hitler was to the right in Germany, but only for the simple fact that the Communists were to the left and any free-market Capitalists were non-existent. Had Hitler been here, he'd have been on the leftist plane. There is not one damn thing that was limited government, individualist, or Capitalist about him. Everything he did ran in stark contrast to what American conservatives believe in, from gun control/confiscation, to eugenics, to controlling what businesses could produce, to nationalistic healthcare, etc.

Oh, wait, he loved his country. That's one. ....and it's the only one.

(02-15-2011 08:41 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 08:37 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  If not for my Christian belief system I would also be a conservative. I just choose to love others as myself. I even love GTS.

Conservatives are, by FAR, more charitable than liberals. Liberals think stealing someone else's money, giving it to another, while they reap the benefits of votes, etc., is charity. Got news for you, it isn't. Break out your own f'n wallet.

...and more humble too

When you make an asinine claim such as you did don't expect it to go unanswered.

(02-15-2011 07:39 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 07:23 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 07:22 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:00 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-13-2011 10:14 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Because it's relevant. When someone criticizes a capitalist it's natural to point out the obvious, what has been wrought by socialists.

Is this dramatic pause, I am awaiting your list.

Seriously? I give you a short list of socialist philosophical writers and you ask what they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.. Amazing.

Has your research turned up anything yet? Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, anything they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.?

Hitler is a liberal? Do you even know what socialism is? It is an economic philosophy. You seem to know nothing about liberalism, socialism or Ayn Rand's writings. I'll bet you know what time Rush comes on to tell you what to think.

Socialist. Yes, Hitler was a socialist. If you feel better pretending he wasn't a fascist socialist, your delusions matters not to me. He's only one on that list so address the others if you prefer. Question still stands. Got anything on Rand that compares to what these socialist giants did? Maybe you should consider that your outrage is misplaced.

It's silly but you asked. No, I have no idea what time Rush comes on.

(02-15-2011 08:27 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 08:19 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 05:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  9 of our 10 hottest years in recorded history have been in the last decade with the outlier being 1998 (which is tied with 2010 as the hottest on record) You have scored zero but thanks for playing. I like you, your silly

No, they haven't. Unless you believe faked data. And, from the references you cite and how you cite them, I believe you do. If you really want to get into the science questions, I'm your huckleberry.

But for the record, you lose.

This is per the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for us non scientist) Oh and by the way Dr. Torch that is game, set and match assuming you are a reality based life form.

I didn't say the claims didn't exist. I said it wasn't true.

Those numbers are exaggerated. They've been disproven on several occasions, and they go through "refinement" and get presented again. Furthermore, they ignore the uncertainties in their own measurements. No current instruments are able to give the Earth's temperature to two decimal places, not w/ any meaningful precision.

So no, I don't lose. Except my tax dollars.

(02-15-2011 09:21 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 08:27 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 08:19 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 05:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  9 of our 10 hottest years in recorded history have been in the last decade with the outlier being 1998 (which is tied with 2010 as the hottest on record) You have scored zero but thanks for playing. I like you, your silly

No, they haven't. Unless you believe faked data. And, from the references you cite and how you cite them, I believe you do. If you really want to get into the science questions, I'm your huckleberry.

But for the record, you lose.

This is per the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for us non scientist) Oh and by the way Dr. Torch that is game, set and match assuming you are a reality based life form.

I didn't say the claims didn't exist. I said it wasn't true.

Those numbers are exaggerated. They've been disproven on several occasions, and they go through "refinement" and get presented again. Furthermore, they ignore the uncertainties in their own measurements. No current instruments are able to give the Earth's temperature to two decimal places, not w/ any meaningful precision.

So no, I don't lose. Except my tax dollars.

You've settled it, you are NOT reality based but thanks for trying

....says the person that's still pimping man-made Global Warming as a settled science.

(02-15-2011 08:46 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 07:39 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 07:23 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 07:22 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:00 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  Is this dramatic pause, I am awaiting your list.

Seriously? I give you a short list of socialist philosophical writers and you ask what they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.. Amazing.

Has your research turned up anything yet? Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, anything they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.?

Hitler is a liberal? Do you even know what socialism is? It is an economic philosophy. You seem to know nothing about liberalism, socialism or Ayn Rand's writings. I'll bet you know what time Rush comes on to tell you what to think.

Socialist. Yes, Hitler was a socialist. If you feel better pretending he wasn't a fascist socialist, your delusions matters not to me. He's only one on that list so address the others if you prefer. Question still stands. Got anything on Rand that compares to what these socialist giants did? Maybe you should consider that your outrage is misplaced.

It's silly but you asked. No, I have no idea what time Rush comes on.

Facism is the ultimate outcome of neo CONservatism. These are Communists, Marxist, Stalinist, and Nazi examples

(02-15-2011 09:52 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  Facism is the ultimate outcome of neo CONservatism. These are Communists, Marxist, Stalinist, and Nazi examples

A Shining example of ignorance. I don't know you well enough to deduct if it's just flat out stupidity yet.

(02-15-2011 09:52 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 08:46 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 07:39 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 07:23 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 07:22 AM)Paul M Wrote:   Seriously? I give you a short list of socialist philosophical writers and you ask what they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.. Amazing.

Has your research turned up anything yet? Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, anything they did that was worse than Rand collecting S.S.?

Hitler is a liberal? Do you even know what socialism is? It is an economic philosophy. You seem to know nothing about liberalism, socialism or Ayn Rand's writings. I'll bet you know what time Rush comes on to tell you what to think.

Socialist. Yes, Hitler was a socialist. If you feel better pretending he wasn't a fascist socialist, your delusions matters not to me. He's only one on that list so address the others if you prefer. Question still stands. Got anything on Rand that compares to what these socialist giants did? Maybe you should consider that your outrage is misplaced.

It's silly but you asked. No, I have no idea what time Rush comes on.

Facism is the ultimate outcome of neo CONservatism. These are Communists, Marxist, Stalinist, and Nazi examples

Well, if you're going to re-define what the words mean, that might be true. However, if you use the standard meanings of those words, history shows that those tyrannies came about from progressive political/economic movements.

I will concede that neo-conservatism can lead to fascism, and we are seeing hints of that. However, there are very few neo-conservatives around here, despite your name calling.

What's funny is that you do nothing more than spout off stereotypes and caricatures, all while accusing others of doing that very thing. The term is "projection" and most here recognize it when we see it.

The way you write and the way you try to draw conclusions matches with those I've seen who are unfamiliar with rigor and logic, and who listen to others who do the same. You might try just lurking here for a while, maybe asking some questions in order to learn. It would be a new experience for you.

(02-14-2011 04:22 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 02:10 PM)uhmump95 Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 07:20 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(02-14-2011 06:04 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  Pace your hate because Obama will be in office until Hillary takes over in 2016

I've had to since Obama has continued every single bad policy Dubya had. I find it amusing liberals who spent every day bashing Dubya now love Obama ... for having nearly IDENTICAL philosophies.

Actually I find the exact opposite amusing, how conservatives bash Obama, but give Bush a pass for having nearly identical philosophies.

It would be tough to find a conservative worshiping at the Bush alter, in a way libs worship at the Obama alter. Maybe the LameStreamMedia leaves you clueless, not conservatives.

You are kidding right. This board, Fox News, the TEA Party movement et al slept walked through Bush running up the debt and the initial bailout of banks and the auto industry without a peep. The second Obama continued those policies there was an uproar.

Perhaps you conservatives finally pulled your heads out of the sand after Obama was elected. Too bad you decided to bury your heads in you ass in retaliation.

(02-15-2011 10:17 AM)uhmump95 Wrote:  You are kidding right. This board, Fox News, the TEA Party movement et al slept walked through Bush running up the debt and the initial bailout of banks and the auto industry without a peep. The second Obama continued those policies there was an uproar.

You must also have a piss-poor memory.

(02-15-2011 10:17 AM)uhmump95 Wrote:  You are kidding right. This board, Fox News, the TEA Party movement et al slept walked through Bush running up the debt and the initial bailout of banks and the auto industry without a peep.

Completely untrue.

Dude, this is all in writing. If you're going to slander people, at least do it where there aren't megabytes of information that prove you to be 100% wrong.

(02-15-2011 10:02 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(02-15-2011 09:52 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  Facism is the ultimate outcome of neo CONservatism. These are Communists, Marxist, Stalinist, and Nazi examples

A Shining example of ignorance. I don't know you well enough to deduct if it's just flat out stupidity yet.

CONservatives are lemmings unable to engage in critical thought (or intelligent conversation for that matter) All you neo CONS repeat after me... ME NOT SMART