Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
OwlFamily Offline
FLORIDA ATLANTICS DEFENDER OF THE FAITH
*

Posts: 7,113
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 251
I Root For: FLORIDA ATLANTIC
Location: Boca Raton, FL.
Post: #41
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
Folks,

After a year of reading the La Tech board I have come to one and only one conclussion.....

It is only good for this.

[Image: thumb_MichealJacksonPopcorn.gif]

Do not respond, do not comment, just sit back and watch the idiots of that board (although not all, some DO realize the situation they are in) convince themselve that they are God's gift to college football and that any day now they will be in an AQ and dominate the world of NCAA athletics.
12-21-2010 12:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fanof49ASU Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,837
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 263
I Root For: stAte
Location: Nashville, TN
Post: #42
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
They are just minutes away from a CUSA invite.
12-21-2010 12:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Shof Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 937
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 27
I Root For: Cajuns
Location: New Braunfels TX
Post: #43
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 12:50 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  They are just minutes away from a CUSA invite.

Too bad Mickey's big hand has stopped ticking. 05-stirthepot
I do enjoy visiting there to read some. While they do have some venomous posters, a lot are pretty sensible too.
12-21-2010 12:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AstroCajun Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 2,698
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 167
I Root For: UL Ragin Cajuns
Location:
Post: #44
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 12:50 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  They are just minutes away from a CUSA invite.

Those minutes count in the millions, but minutes nonetheless.
03-lmfao
12-21-2010 01:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SpaceRaider Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,722
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 157
I Root For: MiddleTennessee
Location: God's Country
Post: #45
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 01:02 PM)AstroCajun Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 12:50 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  They are just minutes away from a CUSA invite.

Those minutes count in the millions, but minutes nonetheless.
03-lmfao

they're rollover minutes...
12-21-2010 01:05 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
theATLDawg Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,689
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 158
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #46
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 11:07 AM)stebo Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 05:31 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  no but you know what we are sick of. Your constant thought that your Crispy Creme stadium is going to make you any more attractive to anyone. The WAC needs you because they are desperate, not because you are going to make any great impact. The stadium is not going to be the answer to all of your problems. MT and WKU are a much more desireable pick up from another conference than having someone named North Texas. Woo Hoo. Get out the champaign and donuts. As a matter of fact it wouldn't surprise me if the MWC picks up UTSA before even sniiffing your donuts. You have a new stadium for one reason. YOur stadium was so bad it was falling apart and it had a track around it. Not because you are this big up and coming program. Jeez get over yourselves. And most of you think Tech is arrogant. UNT is a joke and your new stadium is kinda ugly. Alot of people in the Dallas area and your students are kinda snickering at it. It is just a case of trying too hard and ruining it. FAU's stadium looks much nicer.

The WAC has invited us 3 times - well before Boise jumped off that sinking ship. I actually like the two of you - you seem like rationale Tech fans. If we had a guy like HawgDog (or whatever the hell his name is) as a fan, we would ban him from our message board. He REALLY makes your fan base look ignorant.
yeah. one time they invited you to appease La Tech, against I might add the negative feelings everyone else had about it. The last few times were just because they were desperate. If Montana would change their minds, the WAC wouldn't even sniff your way. You don't offer any DFW market. Not at all. I am in Dallas all the time and it's like you barely exist. You guys go around acting like a new football stadium is going to be filled to the rafters. You might get people in at first to see the stadium, but your fan base will go right back to where it started just with a subliminal craving for something served hot now.
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2010 01:20 PM by theATLDawg.)
12-21-2010 01:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fanof49ASU Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,837
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 263
I Root For: stAte
Location: Nashville, TN
Post: #47
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 01:05 PM)SpaceRaider Wrote:  they're rollover minutes...

03-lmfao NICE!
12-21-2010 01:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Green Menace Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,352
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 119
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #48
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 05:31 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  You have a new stadium for one reason. YOur stadium was so bad it was falling apart and it had a track around it.

The only thing that has come out of your mouth that I believe. UNT desparately needed a new stadium. Fouts Field was so bad that OSHA and the ADA inspectors were too scared to inspect it!03-lmfao

Here's two links to the latest stadium pics. Be sure to click on each photo to zoom in up close. BTW, if this is a lousy stadium, what the hell does that make the Joe?

UNT Stadium Link 1

UNT Stadium Link 2

But I do believe our new stadium, along with Coach Mac and staff, will help in recruiting and our program overall.

One last thing, FAU is starting a very fine stadium too.
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2010 02:41 PM by Green Menace.)
12-21-2010 02:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dchi72 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,279
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 30
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Frisco, TX
Post: #49
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 11:07 AM)stebo Wrote:  The WAC has invited us 3 times - well before Boise jumped off that sinking ship. I actually like the two of you - you seem like rationale Tech fans. If we had a guy like HawgDog (or whatever the hell his name is) as a fan, we would ban him from our message board. He REALLY makes your fan base look ignorant.

Banning people because thier opinions might be stupid?

Yeah that makes a lot of sense.
12-21-2010 02:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OwlFamily Offline
FLORIDA ATLANTICS DEFENDER OF THE FAITH
*

Posts: 7,113
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 251
I Root For: FLORIDA ATLANTIC
Location: Boca Raton, FL.
Post: #50
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 02:26 PM)Green Menace Wrote:  The only thing that has come out of your mouth that I believe. UNT desparately needed a new stadium. Fouts Field was so bad that OSHA and the ADA inspectors were too scared to inspect it!03-lmfao

Ill see your OSHA and RAISE you a HIGH SCHOOL stadium 30 minutes away from campus that was so bad, our coaching staff went out of thier way to not have recurits at home games.

Trust me, Lockhart trumps Fouts in terms of worst facility in the 'Belt.
12-21-2010 02:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
YouCanUseaMint Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 439
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 21
I Root For: Texas State
Location:
Post: #51
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 02:26 PM)Green Menace Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 05:31 AM)theATLDawg Wrote:  You have a new stadium for one reason. YOur stadium was so bad it was falling apart and it had a track around it.

The only thing that has come out of your mouth that I believe. UNT desparately needed a new stadium. Fouts Field was so bad that OSHA and the ADA inspectors were too scared to inspect it!03-lmfao

Here's two links to the latest stadium pics. Be sure to click on each photo to zoom in up close. BTW, if this is a lousy stadium, what the hell does that make the Joe?

UNT Stadium Link 1

UNT Stadium Link 2

But I do believe our new stadium, along with Coach Mac and staff, will help in recruiting and our program overall.

One last thing, FAU is starting a very fine stadium too.

NT's new stadium, Bobcat Stadium > the Joe
12-21-2010 03:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
VideoGreenEagle Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 258
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 6
I Root For: UNT
Location:
Post: #52
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 02:30 PM)dchi72 Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 11:07 AM)stebo Wrote:  The WAC has invited us 3 times - well before Boise jumped off that sinking ship. I actually like the two of you - you seem like rationale Tech fans. If we had a guy like HawgDog (or whatever the hell his name is) as a fan, we would ban him from our message board. He REALLY makes your fan base look ignorant.

Banning people because thier opinions might be stupid?

Yeah that makes a lot of sense.

Who would be left if any stupid opinion caused a ban? I don't know of many who don't EVER have a stupid opinion!
12-21-2010 03:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stebo Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 355
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 26
I Root For: North Texas
Location:
Post: #53
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 03:30 PM)VideoGreenEagle Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 02:30 PM)dchi72 Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 11:07 AM)stebo Wrote:  The WAC has invited us 3 times - well before Boise jumped off that sinking ship. I actually like the two of you - you seem like rationale Tech fans. If we had a guy like HawgDog (or whatever the hell his name is) as a fan, we would ban him from our message board. He REALLY makes your fan base look ignorant.

Banning people because thier opinions might be stupid?

Yeah that makes a lot of sense.

Who would be left if any stupid opinion caused a ban? I don't know of many who don't EVER have a stupid opinion!
SnotDawg is just an idiot. I really don't have a problem with any other fan of any other school in the country. I actually see the point that Tech fans make about differentiation. It's a common business practice. But some customers are bad for business. SlopDawg is one of them. He has a loud and ignorant voice. Every conference has a member that doesn't really belong. Even the Big 12 has Baylor and Iowa State. SEC has Vandy, WAC has Idaho and San Jose. Belt has ULM. They do not really have the money or support to compete consistently. But HotFog is a bad ambassador for the program. The guys that post on this board do so will civility and composure. We might not always agree but they make compelling sports for the need to differentiate. The funny thing IA that the statements could be made about their own school, and they know it. When you can't draw for a home game against an SEC team, your problems are bigger than the Belt. Perhaps Tech should go back to Indy land, they had a bit of national respect then. Now they are just another bottom feeder like the rest of us. But many of the Belt schools have the resources to pull out of obscurity whereas Tech does not and will not ever have that luxury due to location, economic pool, and now... conference affiliation.
12-21-2010 04:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stebo Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 355
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 26
I Root For: North Texas
Location:
Post: #54
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
Excuse the typos this is from my phone and it 'corrects' the spelling (incorrectly!)
12-21-2010 04:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dchi72 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,279
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 30
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Frisco, TX
Post: #55
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 04:35 PM)stebo Wrote:  Excuse the typos this is from my phone and it 'corrects' the spelling (incorrectly!)

Damn autocorrect!
12-21-2010 05:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dchi72 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,279
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 30
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location: Frisco, TX
Post: #56
RE: Yet another "WAC better than the 'Belt for LT
(12-21-2010 04:32 PM)stebo Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 03:30 PM)VideoGreenEagle Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 02:30 PM)dchi72 Wrote:  
(12-21-2010 11:07 AM)stebo Wrote:  The WAC has invited us 3 times - well before Boise jumped off that sinking ship. I actually like the two of you - you seem like rationale Tech fans. If we had a guy like HawgDog (or whatever the hell his name is) as a fan, we would ban him from our message board. He REALLY makes your fan base look ignorant.

Banning people because thier opinions might be stupid?

Yeah that makes a lot of sense.

Who would be left if any stupid opinion caused a ban? I don't know of many who don't EVER have a stupid opinion!
SnotDawg is just an idiot. I really don't have a problem with any other fan of any other school in the country. I actually see the point that Tech fans make about differentiation. It's a common business practice. But some customers are bad for business. SlopDawg is one of them. He has a loud and ignorant voice. Every conference has a member that doesn't really belong. Even the Big 12 has Baylor and Iowa State. SEC has Vandy, WAC has Idaho and San Jose. Belt has ULM. They do not really have the money or support to compete consistently. But HotFog is a bad ambassador for the program. The guys that post on this board do so will civility and composure. We might not always agree but they make compelling sports for the need to differentiate. The funny thing IA that the statements could be made about their own school, and they know it. When you can't draw for a home game against an SEC team, your problems are bigger than the Belt. Perhaps Tech should go back to Indy land, they had a bit of national respect then. Now they are just another bottom feeder like the rest of us. But many of the Belt schools have the resources to pull out of obscurity whereas Tech does not and will not ever have that luxury due to location, economic pool, and now... conference affiliation.

Just like eagereagle?
12-21-2010 05:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.