(12-06-2010 12:09 PM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  

(12-06-2010 11:35 AM)CJPanther Wrote:  

(12-05-2010 10:02 PM)trojans664 Wrote:  Hopefully we'll have 3 SBC teams with winning records once the bowls are completed. This could make a bad year for the conference at least tolerable.

i think if the Belt goes 3-0 and we have 3 teams w/ winning records would turn this down year in the belt into a very big positive goin into next year

If the Belt goes 3-0 in Bowls, is this a better season than last ?

If not, Does it turn this into a "good" season ?

i would think at the very least we would stop saying that this is a horrible season...

(12-06-2010 12:10 PM)CJPanther Wrote:  

(12-06-2010 12:09 PM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  

(12-06-2010 11:35 AM)CJPanther Wrote:  

(12-05-2010 10:02 PM)trojans664 Wrote:  Hopefully we'll have 3 SBC teams with winning records once the bowls are completed. This could make a bad year for the conference at least tolerable.

i think if the Belt goes 3-0 and we have 3 teams w/ winning records would turn this down year in the belt into a very big positive goin into next year

If the Belt goes 3-0 in Bowls, is this a better season than last ?

If not, Does it turn this into a "good" season ?

i would think at the very least we would stop saying that this is a horrible season...

All good points with which I agree. Something else to think about. The SBC has won a total of 5 bowl games, unless I'm forgetting one, in it's 10 year history. To add 3 to that total in one year would monumental and a huge momentum factor going into next season, not to mention recruiting implications.