Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
2010 Football in Review
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
KPJ Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,074
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 15
I Root For: EMU
Location:
Post: #1
2010 Football in Review
Just a few observations:
- Promotions and marketing were way better this year than they have been in the past.
- Actual attendance at the games seemed to be up. Along with the "Paid Attendance" numbers.
- Injuries continue to be a problem
- The highly debated QB battle ended up being extremely one sided. Gillett simply out played Payne.
- I feel much better about the offense this year than last year.
- The defense, well... You know...
- Of the JUCO transfers only Westerman and Grimes played... Westerman probably made more of an impact, but Grimes saw alot of reps.
- cmadler's blog is great
- This discussion board was alot of fun to be a part of...
11-24-2010 06:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Dennis D. Rachwal Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,467
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 7
I Root For: Eagles
Location:
Post: #2
RE: 2010 Football in Review
JC transfers, in addition to Westerman and Grimes,Wlliams played a lot as a strong side corner and/or an outside lb
11-24-2010 08:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
emu79 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,721
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 36
I Root For: emu
Location:
Post: #3
RE: 2010 Football in Review
Add a few and by the way Happy Thanksgiving to all the EMU fans.

Offense:

They finally got "it" on offense. Gillett improved alot this season although when forced to pass his interception rate is fairly high.
The offensive line did a good job. Priest was dependable when he played. The offense is not a very good come from behind offense.
Scott and Thomas showed flashes of being very good they need good games rather than just good plays. Welcome back the TE to EMU offense Thayer did very well and Hoskins had some big plays.

Defense:

The stats tell it all we haven't really improved during English's coaching tenure despite new coaches, new schemes and new players. Some of the JUCOs and redshirt freshmen were disappointments. Not only did teams run against EMU consistently but because there was no pass rush teams also passed consistently.

Special teams:

This is where your backups play. They gave up big plays. The punting was far better than I thought it would be after Zach Johnson's departure. Field goal kicking was an adventure and not dependable.

No it was not a good team but it was an improving team which gives me hope for next year.
11-25-2010 07:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.