Props to La Tech as they are playing much better than I expected. However, I am now convinced that Boise is not a Top 10 team; they are WAY over ranked IMHO.

(10-26-2010 09:24 PM)ManzanoWolf Wrote:  Props to La Tech as they are playing much better than I expected. However, I am now convinced that Boise is not a Top 10 team; they are WAY over ranked IMHO.

I know what you mean. If we are getting that kind of penetration can you imagine what an SEC defense would do. LSU would sack him almost every time. I don't think this being on tv is doing them any real favors. I would say some questionable decisions by Sonny Dykes is actually making them look better than they actually are.

not to mention two quick fumbles. Boise has needed to grab jerseys all night to give their qb time to throw.

This game got ugly fast!

Boise would need a world of gimmick plays to beat an Auburn this year. They better hope these bigger teams lose to get them into the championship game. They will probably end up playing an Oregon team that has a pathetic defense.

(10-26-2010 06:03 PM)SpaceRaider Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 05:12 PM)MT FAN Wrote:  Who cares.

I'm with these guys.

(10-26-2010 03:45 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 02:10 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  Remember.....it's all about 'separation'.

No you didn't! Yeah, I would much rather be blown out by a conference mate that is #2 in the nation than by MTSU or WKU.

We haven't been blown out by anyone YET except for the #1 team in the country 52-26. So, 3-5 vs. 3-5 and 52-26 against #1 vs. 49-20 (on a late garbage TD) against #3. Not a lot of separation.

(10-26-2010 09:24 PM)ManzanoWolf Wrote:  Props to La Tech as they are playing much better than I expected. However, I am now convinced that Boise is not a Top 10 team; they are WAY over ranked IMHO.

Disagree. I felt like they were toying with us. Granted, we gave them great field position all night, but they didn't seem to really break a sweat.

(10-26-2010 10:16 PM)Crump1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 03:45 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 02:10 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  Remember.....it's all about 'separation'.

No you didn't! Yeah, I would much rather be blown out by a conference mate that is #2 in the nation than by MTSU or WKU.

We haven't been blown out by anyone YET except for the #1 team in the country 52-26. So, 3-5 vs. 3-5 and 52-26 against #1 vs. 49-20 (on a late garbage TD) against #3. Not a lot of separation.

Separation is more from ULL and ULM than the rest of the SBC. Recruiting purposes, ya know?

actually really surprised how easy we moved the ball on them. I thought this offense was a fluke but we looked pretty good. just didnt execute some of the finer points of the game. Like not just getting inside the five four times but actually scoring points. We put up alot of yards against the number one defense in the country. and not just mop up yards either. Kinda getting very impressed with this offense.

(10-26-2010 10:27 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 10:16 PM)Crump1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 03:45 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 02:10 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  Remember.....it's all about 'separation'.

No you didn't! Yeah, I would much rather be blown out by a conference mate that is #2 in the nation than by MTSU or WKU.

We haven't been blown out by anyone YET except for the #1 team in the country 52-26. So, 3-5 vs. 3-5 and 52-26 against #1 vs. 49-20 (on a late garbage TD) against #3. Not a lot of separation.

Separation is more from ULL and ULM than the rest of the SBC. Recruiting purposes, ya know?

Let's talk separation.

Tech's baseball team is so bad that their coach's son would rather walk on for the Cajuns than play for dad.

The separation continues.

(10-26-2010 09:24 PM)ManzanoWolf Wrote:  Props to La Tech as they are playing much better than I expected. However, I am now convinced that Boise is not a Top 10 team; they are WAY over ranked IMHO.

I agree.
Boise won't sniff the title game. They needed complete domination, and fell well short of that.

(10-26-2010 02:01 PM)trojanbrutha Wrote:  I think TF puts up a few more points than that...but, the end result is the same...
BSU 45
techies 20

Nice call!

(10-27-2010 08:45 AM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 09:24 PM)ManzanoWolf Wrote:  Props to La Tech as they are playing much better than I expected. However, I am now convinced that Boise is not a Top 10 team; they are WAY over ranked IMHO.

I agree.
Boise won't sniff the title game. They needed complete domination, and fell well short of that.

Boise has the same problem Troy has, they get everyone in-Conference's best game. It's tough to get up for every game when you know you are head and shoulders better than the competition.

I wouldn't base my opinion of the Broncos on last night's performance. Tech has TF and was probably as "geeked" as they will get all season for an ESPN primetime game against the biggest boy in the WAC. It took pure talent to overcome low energy and sloppy play for BSU.

We had a similar situation when UL came to town a couple weeks back.

To have 3 kids, Franklin must have a 20 yd dick 'cause he sure can't score from up close.

(10-27-2010 08:18 AM)AstroCajun Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 10:27 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 10:16 PM)Crump1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 03:45 PM)T_Won1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2010 02:10 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  Remember.....it's all about 'separation'.

No you didn't! Yeah, I would much rather be blown out by a conference mate that is #2 in the nation than by MTSU or WKU.

We haven't been blown out by anyone YET except for the #1 team in the country 52-26. So, 3-5 vs. 3-5 and 52-26 against #1 vs. 49-20 (on a late garbage TD) against #3. Not a lot of separation.

Separation is more from ULL and ULM than the rest of the SBC. Recruiting purposes, ya know?

Let's talk separation.

Tech's baseball team is so bad that their coach's son would rather walk on for the Cajuns than play for dad.

The separation continues.

no seperation would be getting beat at your homecoming to WKU 56-21. now that is some seperation. If you had lost to Boise by that score I would understand but man WKU hung 54 points on you. I think there there is more of a seperation between ULL and the Sunbelt.

(10-27-2010 10:27 AM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  To have 3 kids, Franklin must have a 20 yd **** 'cause he sure can't score from up close.

Now that's disturbing...

Seriously, that was one of the issues that some of us TROY fans noticed as the seasons progressed with TF...not many, if any, short yardage packages were utilized close to the goal line...he's got a hoss at RB, though...Creer was pretty impressive...

(10-27-2010 11:34 AM)trojanbrutha Wrote:  

(10-27-2010 10:27 AM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  To have 3 kids, Franklin must have a 20 yd **** 'cause he sure can't score from up close.

Now that's disturbing...

Seriously, that was one of the issues that some of us TROY fans noticed as the seasons progressed with TF...not many, if any, short yardage packages were utilized close to the goal line...he's got a hoss at RB, though...Creer was pretty impressive...

That QB sneak isn't so easy when you're not under center. We had (and still do) the toughest time with 3rd and 4th and ones under Franklin.