Since we have a lil over 50 days till something meaningful happens in the college sports world I thought id see which of these topics you consider the WORST most filled with meaningless dribble this year..

Note: I left off confrence expansion on purpose because that actually looked meaningful and could of affected us all. Usually its right up there with offseason dribble but IMHO not this year.

Even columnists are struggling. Denver Post has a riveting column on the fact that the Pac-10, Big 10, and Big XII won't have the number of schools mentioned in their name. No mention of the 14 full members of the Atlantic 10.

http://www.denverpost.com/colleges/ci_15462654

How about adding "all of the above" ?

(07-08-2010 08:51 AM)MG61 Wrote:  How about adding "all of the above" ?

all are worthy candidates, though I lean towards the "fcs look at me" posts/threads...

FOOTBALL season can't get here soon enough!

I think I can see where this thread is going. Smack board.

(07-08-2010 09:56 AM)JoeJag Wrote:  I think I can see where this thread is going. Smack board.

Not really,

I honestly wanted to see what people though were the most mind-numbing things brought up here this offseason.

So far its been on target.

FWIW I voted the School System one. Although the ULM-UL name debate was a close second for me.

UL-? vs. UL-? name debate. It gets real old after years and years of it.

Never gets "new"...........

(07-08-2010 11:27 AM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  UL-? vs. UL-? name debate. It gets real old after years and years of it.

Never gets "new"...........

+1,000,000

(07-08-2010 11:27 AM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  UL-? vs. UL-? name debate. It gets real old after years and years of it.

Never gets "new"...........

I choose the countless look what ___fans are saying on their site threads. More numerous lately and just as boring as any name thread as ever been.

(07-08-2010 03:15 PM)CajunT Wrote:  

(07-08-2010 11:27 AM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  UL-? vs. UL-? name debate. It gets real old after years and years of it.

Never gets "new"...........

I choose the countless look what ___fans are saying on their site threads. More numerous lately and just as boring as any name thread as ever been.

I bet you did. You are the ring leader of the "UL" countless debates.

(07-08-2010 03:49 PM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  

(07-08-2010 03:15 PM)CajunT Wrote:  

(07-08-2010 11:27 AM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  UL-? vs. UL-? name debate. It gets real old after years and years of it.

Never gets "new"...........

I choose the countless look what ___fans are saying on their site threads. More numerous lately and just as boring as any name thread as ever been.

I bet you did. You are the ring leader of the "UL" countless debates.

Come on KajunRaider, you could no longer hide your love affair with ULM! Having lived in Monroe, I'm sure you miss the "UL" discussions more then anyone!

(07-08-2010 03:49 PM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  

(07-08-2010 03:15 PM)CajunT Wrote:  

(07-08-2010 11:27 AM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  UL-? vs. UL-? name debate. It gets real old after years and years of it.

Never gets "new"...........

I choose the countless look what ___fans are saying on their site threads. More numerous lately and just as boring as any name thread as ever been.

I bet you did. You are the ring leader of the "UL" countless debates.

BTW, I do enjoy messing with you KajunRaider. But I do find it somewhat entertaining that you would not think some posters don't particular care for your constant look what ____ fans are saying threads.