http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...02151.html

Interesting. When Bush makes decisions he's criticized. When he doesn't, he's criticized again. When he let's others do their jobs he's criticized yet again. If Obama's elected I wonder if the Washington Post will scrutinize him this closely.

I think it entirely appropriate. I mean really ... can anybody name the principles Dubya stands for? "Rape the country financially" doesn't count sound like a platform.

I just remember them saying they wouldn't talk with the N. Koreans in unilateral talks. Remember all the fuss that caused? And how about Cheney stalling diplomatic progress behind the scenes.