PACKMAN
Water Engineer
Posts: 51
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
|
Louisana Tech 10 1/2 over SMU
Boise St 19 over Tulsa
UTEP 3 over Hawaii
Rice 7 over Nevada
Clemson 22 over Utah St
UL-Lafayette 4 over Idaho
|
|
10-11-2004 08:48 AM |
|
The_Gipper
Water Engineer
Posts: 27
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
|
PACKMAN Wrote:Louisana Tech 10 1/2 over SMU
Boise St 19 over Tulsa
UTEP 3 over Hawaii
Rice 7 over Nevada
Clemson 22 over Utah St
UL-Lafayette 4 over Idaho
La TEch will beat the spread.
Boise State hasn't beat the spread since OSU and they won't this time either.
UTEP will win by 2 TDs
Rice will roll over NEvada and eassily cover
UTah State leads the nation in TO's and it will continue, take Clemson and the points.
Idaho can't be that bad, pick Idaho to upset the RaginCagins.
|
|
10-11-2004 09:29 AM |
|
Buddy1972
Water Engineer
Posts: 23
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
|
Couple of comments about the Louisiana teams. UL-M beat the Vandals in Kibbie last weekend and I expect UL-L to do the same. The Cajuns are improved this year and have never lost to the Vandals. And regarding my beloved Bulldogs, Ryan Moats is questionable for the game.
<a href='http://www.latechsports.com/article.php?article_id=2004_10_10_16:19:45' target='_blank'>http://www.latechsports.com/article.php?ar..._10_10_16:19:45</a>
|
|
10-11-2004 03:36 PM |
|
broncobob
1st String
Posts: 1,572
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 7
I Root For: The Broncos
Location: Middleton, IDAHO
|
Buddy1972 Wrote:Couple of comments about the Louisiana teams. UL-M beat the Vandals in Kibbie last weekend and I expect UL-L to do the same. The Cajuns are improved this year and have never lost to the Vandals. And regarding my beloved Bulldogs, Ryan Moats is questionable for the game.
<a href='http://www.latechsports.com/article.php?article_id=2004_10_10_16:19:45' target='_blank'>http://www.latechsports.com/article.php?ar..._10_10_16:19:45</a>
"It's important that we prove we can win without (Ryan)," Bicknell said. "We are not a one man team. I thought Freddie Franklin did some good things (against Auburn). Obviously, Ryan is one of the top running backs in the country and a huge part of our success. Hopefully, he will be ready to play Saturday."
Does anyone really believe that LaTech Is NOT a One man team this year?????
Part 2: Everytime I think Idaho will win, they seem to lose. I have trouble believing that they are that bad.
They will probably beat the Cajuns!
|
|
10-12-2004 09:47 AM |
|
Buddy1972
Water Engineer
Posts: 23
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
|
broncobob Wrote:Buddy1972 Wrote:Couple of comments about the Louisiana teams. UL-M beat the Vandals in Kibbie last weekend and I expect UL-L to do the same. The Cajuns are improved this year and have never lost to the Vandals. And regarding my beloved Bulldogs, Ryan Moats is questionable for the game.
<a href='http://www.latechsports.com/article.php?article_id=2004_10_10_16:19:45' target='_blank'>http://www.latechsports.com/article.php?ar..._10_10_16:19:45</a>
"It's important that we prove we can win without (Ryan)," Bicknell said. "We are not a one man team. I thought Freddie Franklin did some good things (against Auburn). Obviously, Ryan is one of the top running backs in the country and a huge part of our success. Hopefully, he will be ready to play Saturday."
Does anyone really believe that LaTech Is NOT a One man team this year?????
Part 2: Everytime I think Idaho will win, they seem to lose. I have trouble believing that they are that bad.
They will probably beat the Cajuns!
Part 1: No debate that Mighty Moats is the man; however, our QB, Matt Kubik, is developing into a pretty solid player. And despite the beatings we sustained at the hands of Miami, Tennessee, and Auburn, our defense (last in the nation last year) is much improved.
Part 2: You must think Idaho will win pretty often.
|
|
10-12-2004 05:08 PM |
|
Buddy1972
Water Engineer
Posts: 23
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
|
:withstupid: Wrong again. Vandals 38, Cajuns 25.
|
|
10-17-2004 09:38 AM |
|