tarheelsben1
Unregistered
|
<a href="http://espn.go.com/ncb/s/2002/0701/1400967.html" target="_blank">unc = #50</a>
here is mr katz view on the whole ordeal
50 North
Carolina
ACC No mercy pick here. We've got one equation for you -- Raymond Felton + Rashad McCants + Sean May = a more competitive and potential NCAA team.
what do you guys think?
|
|
07-03-2002 08:57 AM |
|
hoops13
Unregistered
|
I think #50 is about right for now.
I would much rather go from low in the rankings to high, as a opposed to last year when we went from top 25 to bottom of the ACC.
|
|
07-03-2002 10:16 AM |
|
techfan4
Unregistered
|
I thought this was going to be about football...oh well, 50 is right for both footbll and basketball
|
|
07-03-2002 10:24 AM |
|
hoops13
Unregistered
|
I rather be the underdog, and start from low and work our way up.
|
|
07-03-2002 01:28 PM |
|
The Bomber
Unregistered
|
Optimists can never be pleasantly surprised. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
|
|
07-06-2002 09:20 PM |
|
hoops13
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by The Bomber:
Optimists can never be pleasantly surprised. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That is too complicated for me to think through. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[laugh]" title="" src="graemlins/laughing.gif" />
|
|
07-06-2002 09:22 PM |
|