Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Good news in football's revival-
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
PittsburghBucs Offline
Banned

Posts: 8,695
Joined: Oct 2005
I Root For: Justice
Location:
Post: #1
Good news in football's revival-
The Board of Regents didn't have any objections (why would they?) on Monday.

It seems there will only be two things that could disrupt this.

A- The students vote it down. That won't happen.

B- They can't raise the funds.

That could happen, because a lot of the big donors pushed for the ending of football.

$15 million in a bad sports town is simply a LOT of money to raise. And when you can't even get the stands up for a soccer field . . . .
01-23-2007 10:18 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


ETSUfan1 Offline
SoCon / ETSU Mod
*

Posts: 12,629
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 93
I Root For: ETSU Football
Location: Abingdon, VA

Donators
Post: #2
 
Well Pitt, we have heard that the football committee had big donors ready to give if football would be brought back. I guess we will find out if that was true.
01-23-2007 12:25 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PittsburghBucs Offline
Banned

Posts: 8,695
Joined: Oct 2005
I Root For: Justice
Location:
Post: #3
 
"Big Donors" can mean a base.

The pharmacy school was $11 mil.

The bottom line, though, is that if it goes through they are going to get off scot free for killing X amount of scholarships, seven years of the program, X amount of jobs, and X amount of exposure- all while costing a TON more money.

There are ways they can spin this. For instance, let's say the Bucs make the NCAAs this year but play in the dreaded 16-17 game in Dayton.

They can cry "We need football to get into a better conference so this won't happen again!" Give us all your money!

The fact the Bucs really would be a middle of the road team in a Southern Conference is lost.

Paul Stanton went into that press conference and said he wouldn't raise student fees in 2003 because the tuition had been raised 77%. This makes no sense whatsoever- "I believe a 77% raise is acceptable- but a 78 or 79% increase will be too much to keep jobs, prestige, conference affiliation, scholarships, etc."

Now, he's raising the fees- just pinning them on the backs of students who are currently in middle school.

I'm all for football being brought back- but if you don't hold the people accountable to get rid of it accountable the project will be doomed to failure.
01-23-2007 12:42 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.