(10-21-2019 02:12 PM)stever20 Wrote:  

(10-21-2019 02:08 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-19-2019 04:51 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(10-19-2019 04:24 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(10-19-2019 04:17 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  As i expected a temporary waiver.

The "waiver" was always going to be temporary. Having a permanently deregulated championship game was always going to require a rule change. It's still possible, and that's one of the things the AAC will probably push for. Next is gonna be will they add someone just to add them or just have unbalanced divisions if there is no rule change?

True, the terms 'temp' and 'waiver' are redundant, but that nit aside, what i meant was i thought the AAC would get temporary relief, whereas some here suggested that Aresco would be able to get other conferences to change the rule so it would be permanent.

They needed the temporary waiver to keep the CCG, since they have no time to add anyone for next July.

It also buys them time to lobby for a permanent rule change, which Aresco says is the AAC's preference. Getting the temp waiver certainly doesn't signal that they won't have a permanent rule change later.

If they don't get it, then they will add a 12th team.

true, but at the same time getting the temp waiver certainly doesn't signal that they WILL have a permanent rule change later either.

I never said it did. I was simply replying to the statement above:

"i thought the AAC would get temporary relief, whereas some here suggested that Aresco would be able to get other conferences to change the rule so it would be permanent."

That implies the temp waiver won't lead to a permanent rule change. Nobody knows that yet.