(10-08-2019 04:42 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  

(10-08-2019 03:39 PM)mturn017 Wrote:  

(10-08-2019 03:03 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  

(10-08-2019 01:58 PM)mturn017 Wrote:  

(10-08-2019 01:39 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  I’m curious how the NCAA would feel if UConn made very little attempt to be compliant in 2020.

Let’s say they get a maybe 2 more FBS schools to visit them, plus a couple money games, and then a slew of road games at FCS schools in 2 for 1 or 3 for 1 deals in order to bank FCS opponents in the future that they won’t have to pay for since payment has already been rendered in the form of an away game in 2020.

Do they get a stern letter from the NCAA or are there real consequences?

They might as well just drop to FCS if that's their plan.

They’d only be non-compliant for a year, not permanently.

If they are playing at FCS schools so they don't have to pay the guarantee then they might as well go back to FCS.

I don’t think you’re getting the point. Doing a 2 for 1 with the 1 being in a year you already know you aren’t going to be compliant saves them probably 1-1.2 million in the future.

That’s a pretty nice deal.

Right and also completely sales your football team up the river. Recruits will look at it as a ***** move, fans won't want season tickets to (or gameday tickets) to the weaksauce schedule yo're putting together and nobody is donating to a FB program that a school clearly doesn't care about to that degree.

I understand that the move to the BE wasa BB move and their fans seem OK with that but if you're not even going to try to be an FBS program then just pick up the phone and call the CAA. URI, Maine, Villanova play FB there. Less scholly's. Less scheduling headache.