(02-08-2018 12:48 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 12:39 PM)AppManDG Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 12:02 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 12:01 PM)AppManDG Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 07:58 AM)JCGSU Wrote:  Lol, so you not taking my bet either?

To recap, one year no posting if based on recent recruiting rankings or 24/7 team talent rankings for the G5 I take the top half of every conference based worthless rankings alone and you take the bottom half. Zero goes to last years records, coaching just worthless rankings. Which ever half has the higher winning % wins pretty simple.

All the rankings naysayers sure got quiet quick. AppManDG forgot how to type all of a sudden lol. He never lets anyone get the last word and poof gone.

Haven't gone anywhere. Simply doing things that are more important than arguing with a broken record. I'm just gonna sit back and enjoy watching App win games with all these lowly regarded signees and let the experts explain how App is the exception to the rule. Again...

Sent from my XT1635-01 using CSNbbs mobile app

so you do admit that app IS the exception to the rule, correct?

No. That's the "experts" opinion.

Sent from my XT1635-01 using CSNbbs mobile app

so when you look at facts comparing recruiting rankings and school rankings, and see that app greatly over performs to their level of talent compared to the rest of college football, you consider that an opinion?

Interesting.

I take it you aren't in a field that involves analytics of any sort.

Nailed it....Awesome analysis and most Belt teams are closer in talent than most especially with NMSU and Idaho gone. I ran the last for year avgs and there is a log jam in the middle outside of the top two and bottom two almost no significant difference. It is indisputable the rankings are very reliable even if App pulled off and upset against.....Toledo....