(06-02-2014 05:48 PM)eaglewraith Wrote:  

(06-02-2014 05:46 PM)panama Wrote:  

(06-02-2014 05:45 PM)eaglewraith Wrote:  

(06-02-2014 02:25 PM)panama Wrote:  

(06-02-2014 02:10 PM)Saint3333 Wrote:  All I heard last summer was how great the dome was and I called it a disadvantage in building and gaining support for tickets.

12 months later the GA St. fans now agree.

*sigh*

This is getting tiring and is one of the reasons I will not shed a tear if we leave some day. How many times must we say the same thing? How is the Dome a disadvantage for building and gaining support. LOSING is a disadvantage for gaining support and selling tickets. The Dome is GREAT building to watch a football game. Anyone who says otherwise has eitiher never seen a game there or is just being a douche. We are being presented with an even better option in Turner Field because not only would we get a football stadium , but also facilities for baseball, softball and soccer at the minimum.

I would just love to know what you would have Dome in 2010 other than play in an NFL stadium

I've seen quite a few games in the Dome. I agree it's a good place to watch a game. However, in my opinion, it's a terrible place for a college football game. Nothing about the experience I've had there connects with college football to me. I've been to quite a few stadiums, even the smaller ones felt more connected to the game than the Dome. The atmosphere just doesn't match up, for me.

I would just love to know what you would have Dome in 2010 other than play in an NFL stadium

I agree ya'll took advantage of what ya'll had. That doesn't make some of the points we've raised be any less valid.

Sorry. I have been to more than a few college games in the Dome and you are just wrong. But as with most things on this board there is a clear bias and a utopian vision of what college football should be and anything different is rejected. And now its time to go clean my bbq pit. Lata