(05-11-2014 04:43 PM)FAUAEPi Wrote:  

(05-11-2014 02:37 PM)Eagleditka Wrote:  

(05-11-2014 12:51 AM)FAUAEPi Wrote:  

(05-11-2014 12:40 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(05-11-2014 12:18 AM)FAUAEPi Wrote:  I know this is going to sound very harsh, but there's no other way to say it: if you don't know wtf you're talking about, then don't talk about it. This isn't ESPN, this is a place for informed discussions.

Seriously, two pages of crap just like this?

Conference realignment fever has had people losing their minds for two years.

I don't mind most of it. But my God, actually predicting the divisions of the conferences that will never happen, while totally forgetting programs and including those that would NEVER make this move, is where I have to draw the line.

And this is coming from the guy that spent an hour on conference realignment in his NCAA 14 dynasty. At least I know that my conference moves in the game are fictional and will never happen.

If y'all wanna talk crazy conference realignment, then join FloridaJag over at the Conference Realignment board. If you want to talk REALISTIC AND INFORMATIONAL conference realignment issues, then post it here.

I can't believe y'all took my summit comment seriously. I know it's never going to happen. Realignment must really be dead this year if the conversation has come to this. All that "insider info" seems to have dried up so now it's back to NCAA Dynasty mode scenarios.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't get me wrong, NCAA Dynasty conferences is my jam. I made all conferences based strictly on geography, no matter the size of the program. I also got rid of AQ tie-ins because all conferences are based on geography, and not program size therefor there is no need for AQs.
For example, South Alabama just upset Ole Miss and Auburn in two straight weeks.