(04-27-2014 06:59 PM)MJG Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 05:40 PM)trueeagle98 Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 04:12 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 03:44 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  You aren't the only one. I think the lack of football is the only thing preventing the UTA-TXST rivalry from hitting a high-intensity level.

But would it rival the App State/Georgia Southern rivalry that is tops in the nation?

Just the sun belt nation.

I don't see the sbc having football only members in 8 years and i don't see Idaho and umass going all in.

Since half of the conference is new who knows what direction it will take. Football only is at least done by two other FBS conferences. No FBS conference has non football playing members except the SBC.
The 12 -12 plan is fine going forward but some are obviously against it. UTA and UALR could be forced to add football if 12 all sports is desired. 12-14 makes no sense ten is a better number for basketball.

If I understand you correctly, the ACC has Notre Dame who is a non-football playing member of the conference despite having football.