Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
One reason we shouldn't bring in UMass
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
BruceMcF Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,216
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 789
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #32
RE: One reason we shouldn't bring in UMass
(04-24-2014 11:05 AM)Check Yosef Wrote:  I said southeast to southwest, I know some don't consider Missouri southern but I think historically they have seemed more southern then any other geographical region
Missouri is primarily a midwestern, but its a border state and a quarter to a third of the state in the southeast corner is southern.

However, when there is serious discussion of bringing in Liberty, who has never shown the ability to succeed at the FSC level that UMass has, turning down UMass because:
(04-24-2014 10:44 AM)Check Yosef Wrote:  Minutemen ranked 123

I know app was ranked 126 and geo south 124 and geo state was also already ranked, but app and geo south get a pass from most people because they are in their FBS transitional.
... is absurd. The formal transitional process in terms of being neither eligible for the FCS championship nor a bowl game may only take two years, but clearly it takes, at a minimum, an entire recruitment to senior class cycle for the development transition to complete.

When crafting reasons that the Sunbelt shouldn't just take the money and run with UMass until a clear candidate emerges in its region, the geographical argument has a lot more weight to it than the competitiveness of the program argument.

(04-24-2014 12:09 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  Reason to add UMass: Basketball games for us. Would help raise the profile of the league. (I know they aren't bringing their basketball here, but we could get a few games with them)

Reason not to add UMass: WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER TEAM.
That's up in the air, which is an excellent reason to not add UMass now. Whether or not a 12th team is needed for a CCG has not yet been decided. How much extra money it means for the full-time FB schools in the Sunbelt hinges on whether its required to get a CCG. On a 50/50 split distributed as a travel subsidy, its $125,000 in the year that you go to play in Massachusetts, which ought to be a little extra money, but not much. With a CCG that can be bid for between ESPN, FS1, NBCSN and CBSSN, its probably a bit more than that.

Unlike an FCS call-up, there is June 1 2014 deadline on making the decision for the 2015/16 year, because, after all, UMass is already FBS. So the Sunbelt is not under the same decision deadline as it has been with FCS call-ups. It can make the decision after the CCG decision is made, one way or the other.
(This post was last modified: 04-24-2014 01:35 PM by BruceMcF.)
04-24-2014 01:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: One reason we shouldn't bring in UMass - BruceMcF - 04-24-2014 01:19 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.