(11-18-2017 02:20 AM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-18-2017 01:00 AM)Transic_nyc Wrote:  

Quote:The SEC and Big 10 will push for Texas and Oklahoma. When Texas doesn't want to head to the Big 10 they will head where they can play leverage, the PAC.

Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to the SEC.

Texas, Texas Tech, & T.C.U. to the PAC. #4? I think Kansas. Why? I don't think the Big 10 will expand if their choices are Kansas and Iowa State.

West Virginia to the ACC if they go to a P4 conference. But if Texas heads West and the two Oklahoma's head to the SEC I don't think that the ACC or Big 10 add anyone.

So, Kansas State, Iowa State, Baylor, West Virginia are all likely to the AAC.

If ESPN truly has a say in Texas's whereabouts and they insist on the SEC then the SEC will still only grow to 16 but will likely do so with Texas & Texas Tech.

If ESPN gets a piece of the PACN they it will be the two Oklahoma's to the SEC. This will be especially true if the Oklahomas move first.

I don't think Mizzou has to go anywhere. If they like being in the SEC then that's where they stay. I'm coming to the realization that without an anchor like OU or UT that KU may not pan out for the Big Ten even with Mizzou. Perhaps that's why they weren't picked up when they were last available. So if KU can't entice OU to go with them to the Big Ten then they should attach themselves to UT hoping they're part of the move West.

As you have it figured, yes. Texas, Texas Tech, T.C.U., Kansas to the PAC.

$100 million is a lot of money for an upgrade since $164 million was spent only 5 years ago.
TCU is getting all dressed up to go somewhere.

http://www.star-telegram.com/sports/coll...28853.html


BTW, Kansas is doing a $350 million stadium project, too.

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/college...26821.html

Nobody spends that kind of money on pure speculation........