Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
The dregs of the P5: worse than the middle of the G5.
Author Message
BruceMcF Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,259
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 792
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #21
RE: The dregs of the P5: worse than the middle of the G5.
(07-02-2020 05:54 AM)jedclampett Wrote:  Definition of "dregs":

1 : sediment contained in a liquid or precipitated (see precipitate entry 1 sense 3a) from it : lees —usually used in pluralcoffee dregs at the bottom of the cup
2 : the most undesirable part —usually used in pluralthe dregs of society
3 : the last remaining part : vestige —usually used in pluralthe last dregs of fuel

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dreg


By "dregs," I'm not referring to sediments, but to definitions #2 and #3 above - - just the lowest ranked teams.

But then the bottom third still doesn't work, because "the MOST" would not mix together WVU, Massey 70 and Kansas, Massey 106 ... for two reasons:

First, even in that single season, there is a clear difference in quality between 70 and 106. If you are looking at "the most undesireable", and you have Kansas sitting in there as one of the examples of "the most undesirable", then WVU does not fit.

Second, if you averaged over four or five years, Kansas and Rutgers would still be down there, but the make up of the top half of the "bottom third" would see a lot of turnover.

The definition of "the MOST undesirable part" or "the LAST remaining part" is based on the meaning of the term in use, and as we normally use it, the bottom third is not "the dregs".

Quote: You're in a tenable position to complain about listing the "dregs" of the P5 in 2019 and noting that they were ranked below a good many G5 teams.

I'm complaining about the difference between what the post title advertises it is about, and what the post itself claims it is about.

It is clearly true -- not as shown by your numbers, since who knows where THAT ranking comes from, but as shown by a comment going to a reasonably credible ranking and specifying which ranking they used -- that the "dregs" of the P5 are worse than the middle of the Go5.

It is clearly untrue, as shown by the Massey rankings, that the entire bottom third of the P5 is worse than the middle of the Go5.

And when pressed on that, you shift the goalposts to the bottom third of the P5 (in a given year) being worse then the top third of the Go5 (in a given year).
07-02-2020 03:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: The dregs of the P5: worse than the middle of the G5. - BruceMcF - 07-02-2020 03:29 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.