(09-08-2015 07:18 AM)panama Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 09:27 PM)GaStPanthers Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 02:49 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 02:23 PM)GaStPanthers Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 01:40 PM)panama Wrote:  Curry was recruitng for FCS. His recruiting was not bad for FCS . His coaching hires were. Miles' FBS recruiting has been horrible.

Ehh....I don't know...even Miles said he wouldn't have recruited most of the guys he inherited from Curry.

(09-07-2015 01:53 PM)glsjunior74 Wrote:  We hired a staff of Midwesterners to try to recruit in the South. That's why we have a Fullback starting at RB.

Yep.

Well yeah he wouldn't have recruited them because they were FCS players. But is his recruiting better? I mean we are offering HS backups. LOL.

To clarify, Miles said he wouldn't have recruited them even if he was recruiting FCS players.

Yeah, we've put some guys in the NFL. But Curry's staff had a horrible reputation in Georgia high schools.

In my opinion, Curry's time had passed him; and, he should of retired a year earlier than he did.

Age was not why we had a terrible reputation in high schools. His assistants gave us a terrible reputation in high schools. They were baaaad. Funny, we're talking about Curry being too old and 61 year old Terry Bowden in the same sentence. Bill Snyder would like a word...

As for Miles and who he would recruit, again, we just offered a backup DL. I am struggling to see where recruiting is better under Miles.

Cause it's not. It's the same.

BLAH BLAH BLAH NFL PLAYERS....whatever

Yes you may have had a few good players, but overall your recruiting has been crap for your entire existence. People have tried telling you that the entire time but no one wanted to hear it.