(05-03-2013 01:35 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(05-03-2013 01:00 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  

(05-03-2013 12:59 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(05-03-2013 12:56 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  

(05-03-2013 12:49 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  That's like asking me to show "any evidence" that my USF wants to go to the B1G as opposed to say remaining in the AAC. Of course they do, it goes without saying, since the situation would obviously be an improvement.

Seriously, it's just common knowledge/common sense that the schools i mentioned would prefer the B1G to the ACC. Only the Carolina and VA schools wouldn't. Before coming to this board, i never imagined there was a breed of ACC homer that would doubt that.

How is it common knowledge when no one seems to agree with you.

98% of all college sports fans agree with me. It's only a couple loony-ACC homers, who have an astonishingly over-valued conception of Carolina/VA football, who disagree.

You're not the only non-ACC person that posts here and I don't see them agreeing either.

I'm sorry, but anyone who doubts that before the GoR was signed that
(1) Syracuse, UofL, BC, and Pitt would all have left the ACC for the B1G and (2) Miami, GT, FSU, and Clemson all would have left the ACC for the SEC, leaving the ACC with nothing but its pitiful Carolina/VA core and backfilling from AAC schools, is not playing with a full deck.

Step away from the crack pipe quo. FSU and Clem are more SEC like but can't get in. I don't think Miami or GT would jump because of academics. All of those EASTERN schools don't want to go to the BIG if given a choice.